r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database

Ladislav
16-Jan-2005
[111]
or use my http://www.fm.vslib.cz/~ladislav/rebol/build.r
Anton
16-Jan-2005
[112]
Ok thanks, but it's no longer a problem.. :) I just noticed that 
it's a strange inconsistency, that's all.
Maxim
21-Jan-2005
[113x3]
just found a nasty bug!    if you call browse 5 times in any of the 
rebol view beta versions, rebol crashes.
on window 2k... not sure about other platforms
I posted it on RAMBO...
PhilB
21-Jan-2005
[116]
Same Happens here on rvdraw57e.exe & WinXp proffessional
Anton
21-Jan-2005
[117]
I get the same as PhilB: "**Crash : expand series overflow"  rvdraw57e, 
 WinXP
Anton
26-Jan-2005
[118x3]
Alan just found this issue:
>> site: http://www.dom.com/
== http://www.dom.com/
>> site/1.r
** Syntax Error: Invalid decimal -- 1.r
** Near: (line 1) site/1.r
>> site/1-r
** Syntax Error: Invalid date -- 1-r
** Near: (line 1) site/1-r
>> site/1-1-1r
== http://www.dom.com/1-Jan-2001
>> site/1_r
** Syntax Error: Invalid integer -- 1_r
** Near: (line 1) site/1_r
Actually, just looks like the rebol lexical parser doesn't like it. 
Something I can live with. Just work around using JOIN.
Romano
27-Jan-2005
[121x2]
Anton, what 1.r should be, for you?
standard (= load known) rebol words cannot start with a number ('1a 
is not permitted).
Anton
29-Jan-2005
[123]
Yes, that is what I realised.
Romano
29-Jan-2005
[124]
the rebol parser could be more relaxed (what it is not an integer, 
an url, a file and so on) must be a word!, but so you will never 
see an error! for invalid integer! invalid url! and so on, and the 
parser would be also more slow
Anton
30-Jan-2005
[125]
Ah yes, that makes sense.
Anton
6-Feb-2005
[126x7]
RAMBO ticket #3244
http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3244&

On WinXP: With Rebol/View 1.2.57.3.1c & e betas I can no longer demonstrate 
the bug. :-)  The older View 1.2.56.3.1agg9  still crashes at about 
9000 for me.
View 1.2.57.3.1c  completed successfully three times in different 
sessions, and three times in the same session.
View 1.2.58.3.1e  completed successfully twice.
The test code just scans HKLM, I wonder if I dare scan the entire 
registry ?
But I would like to stress-test by starting several rebol sessions 
to compete for the same keys at (hopefully) the same time.
In Firefox, the Example code section in the link above is shown with 
an extra newline for every line. Looking at the rambo-generated source:
<pre>rebol [
<br>	{
<br>		2.1.24 crashes windows XP at n = 214 in my system
<br>	}
<br>]
<br>n: 0
<br>scan: func [name blk /local y][
<br>	probe name
<br>	probe n: n + 1

<br>;	write clipboard:// name ;if this line is not commented, crash 
appears after more iterations
<br>	foreach x blk [
<br>		y: list-reg/HKLM join name [x "\"]
<br>		if y [scan join name [x "\"] y]
<br>	]
<br>]
<br>
<br>scan "" list-reg/HKLM {}
<br>halt
<br></pre>
You can see all the <br> tags, which are not needed when using the 
<pre> tag, as far as I know. (I thought html tags in the scope of 
a <pre> tag were supposed to be ignored).
Izkata
6-Feb-2005
[133x2]
If they are, then only some are ignored - I know <a> tags still work 
insire <pre> tags.
inside*
Oldes
9-Feb-2005
[135x2]
#3626 - path-thru - I'm using "_query_" instead of #"?" char in the 
path and "_atport_" to recognize different port of the url
so the file may look like %localhost_atport_88/test.php_query_id=100
Romano
9-Feb-2005
[137x6]
anton: yes, seems that the crash is gone
#3623 the proposed split-path fails in some situations
for example here: %file or here: %e./
this is a different version which use parse and is > 4X  on my system
rebol[
	Author: "Romano Paolo Tenca"
	Date: 10/02/2005
]
split-path-3: func [

 "Splits a file or URL pos. Returns a block containing path and target."
    target [file! url!]
	/local dir pos
][
	parse/all target [
		[#"/" | 1 2 #"." opt #"/"] end (dir: dirize target) |
		pos: any [thru #"/" [end | pos:]] (

   all [empty? dir: copy/part target at target index? pos dir: %./]
			all [find [%. %..] pos: to file! pos insert tail pos #"/"]
		)
	]
	reduce [dir pos]
]
it also fix this split-path bug:
>> split-path %""
** Script Error: Out of range or past end
** Where: split-path
** Near: last target
>> split-path-3 %""
== [%./ %""]
Anton
10-Feb-2005
[143x5]
Oldes, good ideas. Do you think the "?" -> "%3F" is a replacement 
which is more prone to collision (than a longer string such as "_query_" 
) ?
Or perhaps you think it could cause problems of automatic decoding 
when ( if it ever happens ), the public cache path is converted back 
to a URL! ?
Anyway, I think the "?" replacement is the one that fixes the most 
common problem. I think ports are not such a common problem. Obviously 
you needed it to work for something..., but I wonder what your opinion 
on it was.  We shall need to make a total solution at some stage...
Gosh! now I think it might be better to replace the "?" with a slash 
"_query/"  (<-- note the slash), so it becomes a new directory.
eg: path-thru http://www.dom.com/cgi.r?hello
;== view-root/public/www.dom.com/cgi.r/hello
Allen
10-Feb-2005
[148]
Anton, if you do that, how do you convert it back?
Anton
10-Feb-2005
[149x6]
I guess you can't, unless you know more. I just leapt at that idea 
because I thought it would reduce the amount of repetition in path 
and filenames.
(so all the cgi.r queries would be grouped as files in the cgi.r/ 
directory)
Mmm.. similar to Oldes' method, you could replace "?" -> "_query/", 
  then directories that end with "_query/" are converted back to 
"?"
Ahha! I just re-read my previous post... :) Duh!
The example should have been:
eg: path-thru http://www.dom.com/cgi.r?hello
;== view-root/public/www.dom.com/cgi.r_query/hello
Anton
11-Feb-2005
[155x3]
I just found a strange bug:
>> read %rebol.r
== {
REBOL [
    Title: "REBOL Extended Definitions"
    Date: cvs-date "$Date: 2001/04/29 16:00:17 $"
    Rights: "Copyright (C)...
>> read %rebol.r.
== {
REBOL [
    Title: "REBOL Extended Definitions"
    Date: cvs-date "$Date: 2001/04/29 16:00:17 $"
    Rights: "Copyright (C)...
>> read %rebol.r.....
== {
REBOL [
    Title: "REBOL Extended Definitions"
    Date: cvs-date "$Date: 2001/04/29 16:00:17 $"
    Rights: "Copyright (C)...
Trust me, these files do not exist: [ %rebol.r.  %rebol.r..... ]
I'm on WInXP NTFS, can anyone try linux or another filesystem ?
Sunanda
11-Feb-2005
[158]
No such problem on Win98   -- tried it with the live and latest betas.
PeterWood
11-Feb-2005
[159x2]
I'm on Win/XP and got this with Core 2.5.6

>> print read %rebol.r
REBOL[
    Title:   "REBOL Extended Definitions"
]

feedback: func [
    "Send REBOL feedback."
][

    print "Go to http://www.rebol.com/feedback.htmlto send feedback."
]
There is a file rebol.r in the directory where rebol0301.exe