World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1960] | Exactyl! Now you're talking. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1961] | 2006 in 40 minutes, till later |
Terry 1-Jan-2006 [1962] | Graham wins the first to say something can't be done" award.".. Graham, looks like you've earned the coveted "energy vampire" award for today. |
yeksoon 1-Jan-2006 [1963] | Please, no IOS. My suggestion, promote the mailing list..and use IRC. Example, the committe in charge can use IRC for regular discussions, and anyone who may have interests on any topic can just logon to the channel and take part. Reduce the 'elitism' part. ....make it more accessible for developers. Some of them could be on Mac etc. |
PeterWood 1-Jan-2006 [1964] | As far as I can tell, the main constraint on developing Rebol.org is the lack of people prepared to get involved and give their time. From my knowledge, Sunanda has single-handely maintained and developed Rebol.org for the last two years. (All in his spare time as he does it on a voluntary basis). (I'm definitely more of a hindrance than a help:-)). Reichart is right, Rebol.org looks drab when compared with something like Ruby Garden FAQs. It doesn't appear friendly. Rebol.org lacks features though many that it has aren't used much(member home pages, forums for individual scripts, articles). If I remember correctly, Sunanda has asked on a number of occasions for suggestions and help with the design/layout of the website. He's put in place most of the suggestions received which has resulted in some improvement in the look over the last couple of years. What Rebol.org probably lacks is the clear focus and direction that creates a sense of purpose which will encourage people to volunteer. The may be a great part to the "paternal" relationship with RT which not only "fathered" the library system but continues to finance the server. A successful RebolCentral would probably give Rebol.org a renewed focus and probably won't divert any resources away from it. |
[unknown: 9] 1-Jan-2006 [1965] | Yeksoon, I don't think IOS is where topics should be had, but offering a public IOS system that does "something" could be cool to show off. Sort of like a model house. No? Peter, I actually did not know who ran Rebol.org (see! My point exactly about -centralizing information, :-) ) I think we could work together though. As far as I'm concerned, anything built for RebolCentral.org will be open and free for trade. Perhaps we can build and lock down templates that get carried to the other sites to create unity. I see no reason to replicate anything as well. In other words, if possible, we build one database of all content (perhaps what is already on Rebol.org) and leave it there, simply build a review system that points to it. Most download sites work this way. They are just a clearing house to other sites. |
Robert 1-Jan-2006 [1966x2] | Where can I get the latest SDK download from? |
On rebol.net I don't understand these two versions: 5-Dec-2005 Release Win32 031 View 1.3.2 18-Nov-2005 Alpha See Above View 1.3.61 Isn't 1.3.61 more advanced then 1.3.2? I'm mostly looking for the plug-in DLL. | |
Volker 1-Jan-2006 [1968x3] | IOS: I would not use it as a permanent server. Instead: When we did the bbs, carl fired up a fresh one. We had chat and file-syncing. I would prefer to use it in such short-term ways. Then backing project up to web. |
rebol.org - afaik its hosted on some shared server. maybe we can host it on the dedicated too? Then Sunanda & team can play whit daemons. chat, auto-filesyncing etc. rebol-org, layout. IMHO it looks like slashdot. :)) I see rebol.com and rebolcentral as the use-sites and rebol.net, rebol.org as the programmer-sites. central and .org could share some things, like list of projects. But some thingslike the ML-arhcive is better on .org, and a clear "nerds"-look may be a good signal. | |
sdk: the 1.3.2 . 1.3.62 is 1.3.2 with rebcode. | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2006 [1971] | Or would be if there was a 1.3.62 - right now the latest rebcode release is 1.3.61, based on the 1.3.1 codebase. 1.3.2 is actually more recent. |
sqlab 2-Jan-2006 [1972] | Ein frohes und glückliches 2006 für Alle |
Geomol 2-Jan-2006 [1973] | Happy New Year! Let it be a good one! :-) |
Louis 2-Jan-2006 [1974] | Happy New Year everybody! Already almost two days old! |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1975] | Worse virus Microsoft (and any of us using Windows) has ever seen! http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/912840.mspx |
JaimeVargas 3-Jan-2006 [1976] | No virus(es) in OSX ;-) |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1977] | They may have lot more to do with the fact that hackers don't target OSX. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1978] | Windows executing anything is a good help. |
JaimeVargas 3-Jan-2006 [1979] | OpenBSD doesn't have virus(es) |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1980x2] | There is Theo. Hackers fear the revenge.. :) |
Nice. MS has a patch. But instead of maybe disabling a rarely used feature they want the pcs to be infected instead? | |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1982] | Jaime, not that I want to engage you in an argument, but stating OpenBSD doesn't have viruses is like saying cute blond girls don't get AIDs. If you want to refer to OpenBSD as being more secure, and more importantly more securable if installed correctly, then we agree. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1983] | I thought "no exploicts" means no viruses can find a way in? |
Pekr 3-Jan-2006 [1984] | Viruses don't necessarily use exploits :-) |
Rebolek 3-Jan-2006 [1985] | users are biggest exploit |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1986x2] | OS has to protect against users too. When hovering or loading loads code, bad. |
A smart user uses two computers, and that should be done by os instead. | |
JaimeVargas 3-Jan-2006 [1988] | Reihart. I was just teasing ;-) (However I find both OSX and OpenBSD more secure) |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1989] | Good. And we agree, they are much more secure. I strongly feel that OSes should be OpenSource. |
Pekr 3-Jan-2006 [1990] | only OSes, or even languages, which are regarded being platfforms? :-) |
yeksoon 3-Jan-2006 [1991] | then the next question will be 'should all platforms' be open source? |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1992] | I have to agree about languages. I'm the one that pushes Cark "alway" to open as much as possible on Rebol. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1993] | What options are there to pay the ranch, with an open rebol? |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1994] | Sorry, that was meant to be Carl...LOL There is more money in service in my opinion. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1995] | What could RT do there? |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1996] | What does RedHat do? What do the teams that make Firefox, and OpenOffice do? And Gnu compiler? |
Graham 3-Jan-2006 [1997] | This is the model that many companies use when they open source their products .. they become very successful servicing companies. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1998x2] | They have people for services. Take other peoples code and integrate it. RT builds only the languages. Carl is quite reluctant to take others code. |
Would need areal company which pays as much as he gets now, keeps out of the way (No feature-wishlists). (My guess). | |
Terry 4-Jan-2006 [2000] | Probably too late to benefit from sourcing Rebol now... should have done it 5 years ago. |
Volker 4-Jan-2006 [2001x2] | Maybe the opposite. As Reichart says, some things are easier to sell when there is competition. Now we have ajax. |
That may give more chances to offer services. | |
Terry 4-Jan-2006 [2003] | Maybe, maybe not. |
Volker 4-Jan-2006 [2004] | :) |
Pekr 4-Jan-2006 [2005x5] | I thought that Safeworlds has some influence on RT, as well as Carl listens to other folks like Jaime etc. I now wonder if he is alone in anti-open-source opinion? |
btw - has anyone solved calendaring functions? I am about to proceed with our toursist portal and part of it are various Events in the region. Of course there is a date when such even happen. But it may get more complicated and I don't know how much should I complicate it :-) E.g., you may have some event, which is happening each monday for two months, you have some event, which is happening the same term each year. I am thinking of introducing time-slots, so that you can e.g. set 9:00 - 11:00, 13:00 - 15:00 in one day. But dunno how to aproach calendar. E.g. in one app I needed to count working days - not so easy, especially when each country can have various holidays etc. | |
but maybe I will not offer so much complicated solution, or I would have to implement whole calendaring facility, which surely is not trivial, or projects like Sunbird (Mozilla calendar) would be done in one day :-) | |
any references to calendaring api? | |
imo it should be extension of the 'now fuction ... e.g. for one project I needed to count week-of-year, so I created small function for it. Has anyone find usage/potential for such functionality? | |
older newer | first last |