World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Jean-François 4-Oct-2005 [1762] | Does anyone have a good simple time tracker to suggest. I'm on Win 98. I don't need much. Just start stop reset. It would be nice if it could count up to a certain number of hours, not reset when it is turned off, have a space to log tasks accomplished, and show some kind of report when needed. It also needs to be portable (USB key) because I work at different computers. Maybe something has been written in Rebol, that would be nice, but it's not an absolut requirement. many thanks, |
Carl 4-Oct-2005 [1763x2] | I've seen a couple of those written in REBOL. I wrote one a while back too. |
If no others come forward, let me know, and I'll run a search for it. | |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1765] | How can i make Rebol crash without the "Shouldn't happen" warning?? |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [1766] | quit ? |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1767x2] | I want it to quit.. but when it crashes, it pops up a window.. I want it to just go away, so my 'monitoring' script can just restart it :) |
(I need it to free up the port when it crashes) | |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [1769x2] | of if you are on windows xp go to systems-> advanced options-> error reports (button on the bottom right) |
(you can press the window key and pause) disable error reports (topmost checkbox) mi XP is in spanish so im just guessing but should be there | |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1771] | Hmm, already disabled |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [1772x2] | realy ? |
then you must trow another kind of error maybe remote RPC ones | |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1774] | it pops up a rebol window |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [1775] | would you belive me, i never saw that popup |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1776] | Something like .. "***CRASH*** Should not happen**** |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [1777] | doest rebol have some kind of error handling |
Terry 4-Oct-2005 [1778] | i suppose it does. |
Allen 5-Oct-2005 [1779] | Does launching with -q or -w stop the alert popup? |
Terry 5-Oct-2005 [1780] | don't know, can't recreate the crash |
Luca 5-Oct-2005 [1781] | A Rebol bittorrent is really interesting to see, if anybody has one I'd like to have a look at it. |
PhilB 5-Oct-2005 [1782x3] | Hi Jean .... I have a timer style you could try ..... would just need a tweak to add a reset button. |
Let me know if you would like to try it and I will email you off=-ine | |
off+-ine = offline | |
Jean-François 5-Oct-2005 [1785] | Hello PhilB, Yes I would be interested to try it. |
[unknown: 5] 7-Oct-2005 [1786] | I was thinking about Website ratings and how they seem so useless. Anyone really use the RSACI rating system? I think the solution is for the W3 or some other group to get together with the big search engines and demand a standardized ratings system via meta tags and then enforce them at registration and query levels. This way if for example you went to registry your site at google.com it would not index your site unless it had meta tags that were consistent with the sites content. This way if a website is found to improperly manipulate their meta tags it could be pulled from the index. |
Jean-François 9-Oct-2005 [1787] | Does anyone know if Thunderbird can hide all the reply junk in incoming mail ? I read a mailing list where >>>>>>> is not uncommon ! thanks |
Luca 9-Oct-2005 [1788] | Paul - I agree with you that the rating should be done by a third part but I don't think that the search engines can do it. They can offer it as a separate service but I think that it should be a specialized activity. I mean a company should do only this, someone that take care of the childrens. |
Gabriele 10-Oct-2005 [1789] | just use some collaborative system, like del.icio.us and so on. |
Pekr 11-Oct-2005 [1790x2] | rebcode2.zip posted, daunno what it contains, daownloadaing ... |
probe system/internal - what a bunch of opcodes :-) | |
Volker 11-Oct-2005 [1792] | check-rebcode.r :) |
Pekr 11-Oct-2005 [1793] | why? btw - do rebcode.zip demos work for you with rebcode2.zip View.exe? |
Volker 11-Oct-2005 [1794x2] | Not tried. Because the test are there and the changes are tested? ;) |
decimals there. | |
Pekr 11-Oct-2005 [1796x2] | decimals? That is goo, no? Also labels, etc. |
what does not work is sub-blocks ... | |
Gabriele 11-Oct-2005 [1798] | old demos will not work with this. many changes inside. :) |
Ladislav 21-Oct-2005 [1799x2] | http://www.ag-ip-news.com/getArticle.asp?Art_ID=2162&lang=en |
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/ev50/vote.html | |
DideC 3-Nov-2005 [1801] | Answer to Kru's link on "ExpertRating" : I don't see any Rebol coding exam!! Only general OS/networking exams. |
Rebolek 3-Nov-2005 [1802] | It's first in google if you're looking for "REBOL jobs". I just found it funny. |
Pekr 3-Nov-2005 [1803] | Hi, I would like to ask about how to implement best the auto-upgrade facility in rebol. Now the question is, how to aproach it best way. IIRC, Detective does something like that. Will you help me to answer some of my thoughts? - typically the mechanism can be rather easy - just go and read some site, check for filesize, if differs, upgrade. But that might not be sufficient .. - or you can store somewhere .txt (.cfg whatver file), containing rebol block or object, and do some more clever stuff. Basically following questions come to my mind: - do just simple version check and upgrade to higher version? - imagine an app, developing rather fast, producing xy version in the beginning = update often - the list can get long to load - but - you have to maintain it, as some ppl can be on vacation and still running old version - so - split it into separate, per-version file? I mean - making reverse aproach - provide updating config file for each version available. example - you have version 1.0, there were two other releases, 1.1 and 1.2 - you check 1.0 upgrade cfg and it tells you, you can go directly to 1.2 version ... or not, and you go to 1.1 first, then to 1.2 .... the reason is, that some version might require to rebuild data structures etc etc., so it is not always only about switching .exe Or am I complicating it in unnecessary way? any ideas? |
Volker 3-Nov-2005 [1804x2] | read-thru/check with binary checksums. Each version in own folder. Updater points to the next folder. which usually is empty. once a version is there, download everything, run a update-data.r. then run this versions look-for-update. Continues until no never version there. Look for detective/ask Gabriele how to check that its really all your code. |
really all your code. -> "really your code", if you use encap. | |
Pekr 3-Nov-2005 [1806x2] | thanks ... |
I hope you can place .exe itself in such a directory. It is imo necessary, that in such a case, update-date.r is being run by new .exe already. Imagine you want to rebuild database, and that there is View 1.4, which uses RIF, rebcode. You can't do it using old .exe, which uses older kernel incarnation ... | |
Volker 3-Nov-2005 [1808] | I think so. Make a small launcher which calls the newest installed version. |
Graham 3-Nov-2005 [1809] | What I did was embed a version number .. a tuple in the exe. Each time it first accesses the internet, it checks to see if there is an upgrade by querying a cgi script which returns the current version number. If there is a higher version, it just offers to download it .. download location is always the same. |
Volker 4-Nov-2005 [1810] | Basically like me. But Pekr wanted backward-compatibility for data, so he needs all the in-between-versions for conversion. Or some other way to upgrade data. |
Maarten 6-Nov-2005 [1811] | I mailed the detective goodies to Petr; I have little time but now you can bug him for the code ;-) |
older newer | first last |