World: r4wp

Have you tried using Graham's http-tools? http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=http-tools.r

View question http://synapse-ehr.com/community/threads/adjusting-a-text-list-starting-point.1447/

Vid question I mean

@GrahamC: after "data read %." insert: "with [append init [sld/data: 
0.5 do-face sld none]]".
sld

 is the name of the slider of the text-list, 0.5 means jump to the 
 middle.

I'll post this ...thanks

I have the SDK (full encryption strength) and I've been playing with 
the rijndael encryption algorithm. I cut and pasted the code below 
from http://www.rebol.com/how-to/encrypt.htmland it produces 256 
as the port strength despite the strength being stated as 512. Is 
it 256 or 512? The web page says Rebol can provide 512 with rijndael. 
Can it?

port: open [
    scheme: 'crypt
    direction: 'encrypt
    key: akey
    strength: 512
    algorithm: 'rijndael
    padding: true
]
print port/strength


When I switch the algorithm to blowfish I get the expected 512 port 
strength. Is blowfish actually 512?

I need to know what level of encryption I am working with. TIA.

This is probably because there is no 512-bit AES algorithm -- see 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES%5F%28cipher%29

That makes sense. The strength: 512 in the code misled me to believe 
it should be possible.


The blowfish algorithm works fine, but I presume it actually uses 
a key of 448 bits and not 512. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowfish_%28cipher%29. 
In which case the value returned by the print port/strength is deceptively 
wrong when I test it with blowfish? Or am I missing something?

The final paragraph of the section titled the algorithm in the wikipedia 
enttyr for Blowfish explains that it is possible to implekment the 
algorithm with keys of up to 576 bits long but not advised by the 
author of the algorithm. Though when I was using REBOL for some testing, 
I set the strength to 448. 


I would have thought that AES 256 would suffice for for most purposes 
needing symmetrical encryption

AES 256 is more than sufficient for most purposes. I am researching 
what Rebol can do so I am aware of the parameters I am working within. 
I am writing code that will be used to encrypt communication between 
clients who want a secure communication facility.


I am looking at the Rebol RSA algorithms now. Thanks for your input.

have an issue:
>> fact1: 'a/a
>> num1: 99.0
>> blk: [greater? to-decimal obj/:fact1 num1]
>> objs: []
>> o: make object! [a: make object! [a: "100.0"]
>> append objs o
>> o: make object! [a: make object! [a: "99.0"]
>> append objs o

>> foreach obj objs [if equal?  do bind blk 'obj true [print obj/a]]
**Invalid path value: a/a

well... let see...

>> blk: [greater? to-decimal do bind reduce [fact1] obj num1]

you"re doing tortuous things

looks like it :(

So, Did you check my correction ?

not working for me

>> foreach obj objs [print do blk]
** Script Error: Invalid path value: a
** Near: a/a

sorry!

>> foreach obj objs [print do bind blk 'obj]
** Script Error: Invalid path value: a
** Near: a/a

I repeat, did you take that correction ?
>> blk: [greater? to-decimal do bind reduce [fact1] obj num1]

yes

It works fine with your data

copy that, it must work:

fact1: 'a/a
num1: 99.0
blk: [greater? to-decimal do bind reduce [fact1] obj num1]
objs: []
o: make object! [a: make object! [a: "100.0"]]
append objs o
o: make object! [a: make object! [a: "99.0"]]
append objs o
foreach obj objs [if equal?  do bind blk 'obj true [print obj/a]]

bloody typo again. sorry steve. yes it does work. its 430am here...

Okay

Where are you from ?

india

How have you discovered  Rebol, If I may ask ?

online! was looking for something light and fast (in dev terms)

rebol is ideal

if i do:

fact1: 'a
o: make object [a: "100.9"]
append objs o
foreach obj objs [if equal?  do bind blk 'obj true [print obj/a]]
** Script Error: Invalid argument: a: "100.0"

wtf!

typo again
>> o: make object! [a: "100.9"]
you need sleeping time

nope. i corrected that and still the same error.


i have data stored in json. i use json.r to convert to rebol objects. 
i want to create a query layer on top of this - which is why the 
expression builder...
the fact1 is an attr of the data object. these can be nested.
how best can i build the expression to retrieve the value i want?

There's no better response than: it can be done.
You just have to correct the bugs as they come.

:)

is the complete error that one ?

** Script Error: Invalid argument: a: "100.0"

** Where: to-decimal
** Near: to decimal! :value

yes

so you are trying to convert to a decimal something not convertible

add a probe, just after to-decimal

hmmm...not that i know of...just using the test data i put in here:

>> probe objs
[make object! [
        a: make object! [
            a: "100.0"
        ]
    ] make object! [
        a: make object! [
            a: "99.0"
        ]
    ] make object! [
        a: "199.0"
    ]]

you are trying to convert an object to a decimal

as long as fact1: 'a/a it works fine.
if fact1: 'a - boom!

because your objects have structures which are not always the same

how do i tackle this?

what is the name of the decimal attribute ?

a


blk: any [greater? to-decimal probe do bind reduce [fact1] obj num1 
| greater? to-decimal do bind obj/:fact1 obj num1]??

Currenlty 'a stands for either an object or a string, you can't be 
that vague.
You must choose a clear name  to identify the decimal attribute

rats!