World: r4wp
[#Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1082] | It seems that strnlen() is defined for versions >= 10.7.0...unfortunately, I can't upgrade my image (virtual image), so I will replace strnlen() by strlen() in the tests. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1083] | The constructions in the runtime you replaced were very inefficient. Normal EITHER constructions seem to have less overhead than SWITCH and CASE. It's more or less independent from the number of clauses. It may be the default clause, especially when one is needed in CASE |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1084] | After looking at the diff-ed code, I think that replacing all the assignment in IFs bodies, by a single one before the SWITCHs is what produced the code size gain. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1085x3] | Yes, I did manage to make small gains where SWITCH could be used, but only when it makes other constructs obsolete. First you have to make good on the overhead of SWITCH itself |
strnlen only available in last year's OS X? Oh man... | |
I suspect you could optimise SWITCH and CASE by detecting constant expressions, like C does, especially when TRUE is used as a default clause for CASE | |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1088] | Probably, but we'll leave that for the final version of the compiler. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1089] | I think --assert 12 = strlen s 32 should be --assert 12 = strlen s in your last commit |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1090] | Thanks, forgot to commit that modification. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1091x2] | Ah, so calling rsc.r from someplace else was the trouble. Isn't that a fundamental problem with the current R2 interpreters? I seem to remember that when a script is running the interpreter already change-dir'ed to the directory containing the script, thereby losing the original working directory. |
Anyone has an easy workaround for that handy? | |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1093] | It's not lost, it should be stored in system/options/path. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1094] | Reliably? |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1095] | I'm unsure about that. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1096] | Time to try again, I guess :) |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1097] | So far, testing with a modified %rsc.r on Linux, it seems to be reliable. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1098x3] | Do you use rsc.r from the REBOL console as well? |
Well, seems to even properly work with DO. | |
(Testing with R2.7.8 on Linux.) | |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1101] | Yes, from REBOL console. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1102] | So `change-dir system/options/path` at the top of rsc.r it is :) ? |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1103x2] | Not sure this would covers all cases. |
We need two paths: one for locating red-system/ root directory and another one for the working directory. So: - system/script/path should give us red-system/ root - system/options/path should give us working directory | |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1105x2] | `do load %rsc.r` and DO-ing rsc.r from an URL are the two only cases I can think of right away where it might make not much sense (it would then use the workdir the REBOL interpreter was started.) |
script/path & options/path: yes | |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1107x2] | What we want is ability to call %rsc.r from anywhere, compiling a program from working dir (or relative to working dir) and producing the binary in the working dir. |
(Kaj correct me if I'm wrong) | |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1109] | Yes, that's what we want. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1110] | Yes |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1111x3] | A minor question re the output binary remains: do we want to keep up the automatic executable name guessing we do at the moment (foo.reds -> foo || foo.exe), or do we want to use non-descript default name. |
And if we want to keep the "nice" exe names (which would be my guess), what to do if the target file already exists? | |
Most developer friendly (imo): just overwrite it. | |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1114] | Automatic name guessing: yes, we want to keep that and overwrite it if exists already. |
Andreas 20-Aug-2012 [1115] | Ok, should be an easy change, but I guess the test runners will need adapting (if we want the new behaviour to be the default). |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1116] | Yes, we'll need to adapt all our tests scripts. That's why I've tagged the last commit for the release, to avoid further delays. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1117] | Added floating point support to the SQLite binding |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1118] | Nice! |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1119] | It was mostly uncommenting some prepared lines :-) |
DocKimbel 20-Aug-2012 [1120] | Andreas: if you know how to improve working dir handling in %rsc.r, feel free to do so when you want. We'll adapt the test scripts accordingly. |
Kaj 20-Aug-2012 [1121] | I'm trying to move the SQLite binding into a CONTEXT, but I've hit a bug |
PeterWood 20-Aug-2012 [1122x5] | Nenad" "Peter: the lib-test file is crashing here on my OS X 10.6.2 image with following error:" Did you install Xcode including the Unix libs? I wrote the tests under OS X 10.6 but am now running on 10.7. |
What we want is ability to call %rsc.r from anywhere, compiling a program from working dir (or relative to working dir) and producing the binary in the working dir. Please can we also supply a second argument to rsc.r for the output dir/file name (the gcc -o option with improvements). If the second argument is a dir then the executable is written to that dir instead of the current working dir. If the second argument is a file then the executable is saved with that name. | |
(That would really help with quick-test). | |
I just checked on my old machine, I did re-wrtie the lib tests on OS X 10.6 but on OS X 10.7. | |
I meant that I re-wrote the lib tests on OS X 10.7 not 10.6. | |
DocKimbel 21-Aug-2012 [1127x2] | Did you install Xcode including the Unix libs? I have Xcode installed, but don't know if it includes Unix libs or not...how can I check that? |
The -o command-line option for %rsc.r is already there (and since a while). ;-) | |
Oldes 21-Aug-2012 [1129] | I was reviewing my old iMagick.reds binding for a while and found that it the current version I cannot write something like: DrawComment: "DrawComment" [ ;== Adds a comment to a vector output stream ;-- void DrawComment(DrawingWand *wand,const char *comment) wand [DrawingWand!] ;the drawing wand. comment [c-string!] ;comment text ] It throws: *** Loading Error: invalid comment string Do we really need to have 'comment word such an important? I'm pretty sure I would never use it in declarations (as a comment). |
DocKimbel 21-Aug-2012 [1130x2] | It should be allowed imported functions spec block. |
*allowed in | |
older newer | first last |