World: r4wp

ok, i think it was Lawrence Rosen and the license was the Open Software 
License.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Software_License

I'm more concerned about the license. His last attempt at an open 
source R3 license wasn't - it had usage restrictions that violated 
the definition. That's why all of my mezzanine work was MIT licensed, 
even the stuff that Carl included in R2 and R3.

So, just the mezz code recently added or all R2/R3 mezz code is MIT?

Heh, so the person impersonating Carl on his blog is now also trying 
to fake the yellow background? Quite insistent, that one :)

Ah, I was wondering, because it's not completely filled out, but 
he got me this time

I can't find anything on Github

Doc, maybe half of R3's mezz code is MIT (since I wrote it). All 
R2 mezz changes since 2.7.5 are MIT too since they're licensed from 
R2/Forward.

The HTML is screwed up in the comments section now.

Sorry, just tried to make a point :-)

You replied the same second Kaj Luke!

No, that's another way to prove the point. You can just edit the 
time of your message. Do you want me to answer before the previous 
post? :-)

Maybe you can get the columns the same height again? No I just wrote 
it to point this out in case someone doesn't notice.

No, I can't edit previous messages. Maybe the troll can

I was doubting my previous postings ;)

We have no proof the second fake Carl is the same as the first fake 
Carl :)

To add to the idiocy, there's now a third, real Carl. He's stating 
he agrees with the fake one

Guess it's the real one now as the fake comments have gone

now to guess which of the other 184 comments were faked

Hmmmm.....We now know a way to encourage the real Carl to post :)

Thanks to the fake Carl .. please stand up and take a bow :)

Fake a bow?

just bend over ...

Carl has removed a few more tags to stop spoofing ...

in yellow

soo.. is this reply 10-Sep-2012 14:39:12 the real Carl or just more 
delicate fake Carl? The message still seem too simple about the future 
for the real Carl.

That's the real Carl - only the real Carl can remove comments, and 
comments were removed.

I think that the real hacker, has some surprise under the hood :-)

Note that my Etsy API script does patch HTTP (for purposes of retrieving 
API error messages).  You can view those changes here: http://reb4.me/r/etsy-http-hack.r

And with thanks to Nick for instigating, supporting and helping test!

Thanks Chris and Nick. I'll be using that code!

James, let me know if you encounter any problems. It's always a pain 
getting to grips with an OAuth app to start.

Thanks Chris I will. My wife has been itching to sell some stuff 
on etsy. Thanks for all you do Chris.

No one here can test my new %opengl-glu-glut-h.r on X11?

Cool kaj.

Thanks Kaj.

Hey, you are in the video too this time!

Kaj: how do Fibonaci.ruby and Fibonaci.r compare in speed on your 
demo machine?

Ah, found a verbose: 1 left in natives.reds thanks to your presentation...and 
the code is missing a macro....funny way to debug/improve my own 
code. ;-)

:-)

I published the complete benchmarks here early this year, I think. 
However, my Ruby results are considered unfair, because Syllable 
is using Ruby 1.8, while Ruby 1.9 is much faster. For the record, 
as far as I remember, REBOL is roughly twice as fast on such things 
as Ruby 1.8. Not sure if that applied to Fibonacci, but I remember 
it about Mandelbrot

Android binary is twice the size of Linux one because ARMv5 architecture 
is bad at dealing with 32-bit literal values, so it takes much more 
space than for IA-32.

Yeah, that's more or less what I explained

Even with my experimental literal pools allocator, it decreases the 
final size by 10KB only.

I like the part: "Where will Red be deployed when ready?...Everywhere!" 
;-)

Thank you for your presentation Kaj! I've enjoyed it, but I guess 
I'm too involved to be objective. ;-)

My pleasure

(I think the microbenchmark results were posted back in the REBOL3 
world.)

Oh, right

BTW, wrt to ARM big size binaries, it's also caused by ARM using 
32-bit words for every instruction, while IA-32 has still a lot of 
8 or 16-bit ones. For example, there's a lot of PUSH 0 instructions 
emitted for the datatype registration block (the unimplemented action 
pointers), that's 16bit on IA-32 and 32-bit on ARM.