World: r4wp

Just a request. If you do not want the default, you can use INCLUDE/ONLY 
and save it as you see fit.

Do you think it is a complication for you?

OK, good. Next question. Why not make the new behavior the option?


I only use the linked files directly on rare occasions. I'm just 
wondering what the benefit is. And, at first glance, INCLUDE/FLAT 
seems clearer.

I don't think it will complicate things much for me.

It won't be like CALL/SHOW breaking all kinds of stuff. :-)

So, what is the benefit of molding flat in this case?

The original demand was to have a /FLAT version which I offered to 
add, but Robert asked me to modify /LINK behaviour instead. I do 
not mind, in fact.

...but the fact is that adding another refinement would complicate 
the interface a bit without being absolutely necessary, perhaps

I'm sure it will be fine. /ONLY has a different meaning everywhere 
else, and that meaning could be assumed here, so people just need 
to be aware.

I guess it was Carl who coined /ONLY for INCLUDE.

Well, as I said, this is my first impression. :-)

@Kaj, that will be a test of rebolbot's error handling :)

AdrianS: Thank you for sharing RebolBot, it is a good example script 
of R3 as well.

Well, thank Graham - he did all the work. All I did was rip it apart! 
:-)

Rebolbot: thank you for doing it Graham!


In the README, "About" section, is it normal that a Rebol link is 
pointing at Graham's SO profil while a Red link is pointing at Adrian's 
one?

Not sure why it's like that .. should fix it to point to the correct 
URIs

my AltMe does not support collect in survey-reader

Ah, sorry, should install 2.7.8

Adrian and Endo, thanks for posting!

Endo, just pasting in a func to test, but it always crashes.

Typed in a simple func and that also crashes. 

-= Red Compiler =- 
Compiling /C/Cheyenne/www/_ahb472d1f5g6c38e.red ...
*** Syntax Error: Invalid Red program
*** line: 1
*** at: "incr: func ['n] [set n add get n 1]"

Graham and Adrian, incredible. I should look into right now but will 
probably wait my customary few years to rediscover your genius. Nice 
supportive words for Red Rebol in the Readme!

Gregg, the error is what it says. It needs to start with a Red [] 
header, just like when you run the compiler locally

Too used to tryrebol I guess. :-)

Kaj/Endo, so Red is case sensitive? I tried red [] but it only likes 
Red []. Nevertheless, that's very cool.

Oh, I just read Doc's post.

James: only the header is case-sensitive.

Thanks Doc.

Kaj, so not all bad news then :-)

Trying to light it up :-)

I know, and just when things like this happen there are a bunch of 
people who decide they want to use the site(s)..

I've postponed a Red article until this has blown over

Robert "saving potentials'" would normally be "potential savings"

Thx. Fixed.

That's great news on Android Robert! Congratulations to the Saphirion 
team.

Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculate benchmarks and price forecasting.

Suggest:


A smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool that finds cost optimizations, 
calculates benchmarks, and forecasts prices.

If you want to stay closer to the current text: 


Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculating benchmarks, and  forecasting prices.

Awesome news Robert.  Demo crashed after a bit of play:

** Script Error: event: needs a value
** Where: loop -apply- wait do-events
if view demo 
** near:  loop 8

Gregg, thanks. Corrected.

Nick, thanks for the report. As said it's a very early release but 
we wanted to let you play with it.

Nick, yup, this is know problem. The event handling is a bit unstable 
as I had not enough time for additional debugging before making the 
release (It's a "tax" to have the release now rather than wait one 
more week or so :-)). Will be sorted out in the next release.

Robert, Cyphre & team, thank you so much!

Really huge congrats on this guys.  I'm very excited - focused on 
selling Merchants' Village right now, so coding is on back burner, 
but will give every free moment to testing and documenting...

Thank you Saphirion and Cyphre.  Don't have an Android device at 
the moment (64 IOS devices).  But I will be taking after the next 
release.

Demo worked fine on my Android device without crashes, and I actually 
solved the puzzle!  Probably just got lucky.

...Except, sometimes the tiles didn't line up properly.

Have you run the test Bo?

Yes.  I ran the test and posted it.  (I'm assuming you mean the speed 
test.)

Thanks Bo for giving it a try. Yup, the tile game is a bit "buggy" 
even at the rebol script level as I wrote it around 3 or 4 AM on 
Friday night(or should I say Saturday morning? ;-)) I tried to quickly 
mimick the 'swipe' gesture but it is not perfect at all. Let's see 
if I can improve it in the new release...or maybe anyone here could 
write simple game in R3 even on Windows that will use the DOWN, UP 
and MOVE mouse events the way so it is fun on touch screen? We can 
embedd it in the new release as a bonus or if there are more demos 
we can create simple menu where you can download it and have fun...anyone? 
;-)

Robert and the Team: great work !