World: r4wp

I see. Thanks. I also tried to get the android version to run on 
my Nexus 7.No luck there so I went back to trying the test that was 
originally posted and I can't even get that to run. Sorry, you'll 
need a more experienced test. :-(

There have been failure reports before, so something low level may 
be wrong with current Red on Android

Did you get any response?

What do you mean by the originally posted test? The http://sidl.fr/red/hello
download from Doc's blog is gone

Yes, that one.

It's gone, so you wouldn't be able to download it

Did you get any response?

Go Kaj Go!

Sleep first

INCLUDE: So, the output %.r file, without option, will now be molded 
flat? If so, what is the reasoning?

Just a request. If you do not want the default, you can use INCLUDE/ONLY 
and save it as you see fit.

Do you think it is a complication for you?

OK, good. Next question. Why not make the new behavior the option?


I only use the linked files directly on rare occasions. I'm just 
wondering what the benefit is. And, at first glance, INCLUDE/FLAT 
seems clearer.

I don't think it will complicate things much for me.

It won't be like CALL/SHOW breaking all kinds of stuff. :-)

So, what is the benefit of molding flat in this case?

The original demand was to have a /FLAT version which I offered to 
add, but Robert asked me to modify /LINK behaviour instead. I do 
not mind, in fact.

...but the fact is that adding another refinement would complicate 
the interface a bit without being absolutely necessary, perhaps

I'm sure it will be fine. /ONLY has a different meaning everywhere 
else, and that meaning could be assumed here, so people just need 
to be aware.

I guess it was Carl who coined /ONLY for INCLUDE.

Well, as I said, this is my first impression. :-)

@Kaj, that will be a test of rebolbot's error handling :)

AdrianS: Thank you for sharing RebolBot, it is a good example script 
of R3 as well.

Well, thank Graham - he did all the work. All I did was rip it apart! 
:-)

Rebolbot: thank you for doing it Graham!


In the README, "About" section, is it normal that a Rebol link is 
pointing at Graham's SO profil while a Red link is pointing at Adrian's 
one?

Not sure why it's like that .. should fix it to point to the correct 
URIs

my AltMe does not support collect in survey-reader

Ah, sorry, should install 2.7.8

Adrian and Endo, thanks for posting!

Endo, just pasting in a func to test, but it always crashes.

Typed in a simple func and that also crashes. 

-= Red Compiler =- 
Compiling /C/Cheyenne/www/_ahb472d1f5g6c38e.red ...
*** Syntax Error: Invalid Red program
*** line: 1
*** at: "incr: func ['n] [set n add get n 1]"

Graham and Adrian, incredible. I should look into right now but will 
probably wait my customary few years to rediscover your genius. Nice 
supportive words for Red Rebol in the Readme!

Gregg, the error is what it says. It needs to start with a Red [] 
header, just like when you run the compiler locally

Too used to tryrebol I guess. :-)

Kaj/Endo, so Red is case sensitive? I tried red [] but it only likes 
Red []. Nevertheless, that's very cool.

Oh, I just read Doc's post.

James: only the header is case-sensitive.

Thanks Doc.

Kaj, so not all bad news then :-)

Trying to light it up :-)

I know, and just when things like this happen there are a bunch of 
people who decide they want to use the site(s)..

I've postponed a Red article until this has blown over

Robert "saving potentials'" would normally be "potential savings"

Thx. Fixed.

That's great news on Android Robert! Congratulations to the Saphirion 
team.

Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculate benchmarks and price forecasting.

Suggest:


A smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool that finds cost optimizations, 
calculates benchmarks, and forecasts prices.

If you want to stay closer to the current text: 


Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculating benchmarks, and  forecasting prices.

Awesome news Robert.  Demo crashed after a bit of play:

** Script Error: event: needs a value
** Where: loop -apply- wait do-events
if view demo 
** near:  loop 8

Gregg, thanks. Corrected.

Nick, thanks for the report. As said it's a very early release but 
we wanted to let you play with it.