• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1671]
But if you define a routine in a Red script, and then DO it, it will 
work. You can also build a custom console by writing a Red script 
and adding at the end an %include %<path-to>/console.red.
Gregg
24-Mar-2013
[1672]
Yes, I will read more carefully. Just too excited. :-)
DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1673x3]
if you define a routine in a Red script, and then DO it, it will 
work.
 => the script needs to be compiled for that to work.
About the "painful" part, I would like to provide ready-made Red 
consoles for each platforms. If Andreas (or anyone else) could make 
a redsource site as he did for R3, providing automatic builds, that 
would be great.
I will do it myself if nobody else steps in, once we get the target 
console implemented (Unicode LOAD, EXIT and RETURN supported,...)
Kaj
24-Mar-2013
[1676x2]
I'm working on console downloads
They're basically already in the test repository, but still with 
some flaws
DocKimbel
26-Mar-2013
[1678]
Nice work Graham! Is r3gui.com your site?
GrahamC
26-Mar-2013
[1679x3]
Yes :)
I set it up to hold r3gui docs I had corrected but looks like it 
is going to hold anything related to r3 ( or red !   )
And it's just a S3 bucket confiured as a website which keeps my costs 
down.
Gregg
26-Mar-2013
[1682]
Very nice Graham.
GrahamC
26-Mar-2013
[1683x3]
I am expecting that everyone wil now start to scheme!  ( not in the 
Jaime way though )
Andreas has pointed out that the http scheme uses several async handlers, 
and tcp level handler can create events to send to the outer http 
handler :(
So, it gets pretty complicated
Gregg
26-Mar-2013
[1686]
Anyone know what Jaime is up to these days? In any case this is great 
stuff Graham.
GrahamC
26-Mar-2013
[1687]
Just checked LinkedIn, he's working for some company called homeland 
security
Gregg
26-Mar-2013
[1688]
Yikes! :-)
Bo
26-Mar-2013
[1689]
Are we talking about Jaime Vargas?
Kaj
26-Mar-2013
[1690]
Yes
Bo
26-Mar-2013
[1691]
I still have a couple of his WhyWire wireless units operating on 
a ranch here north of Ukiah.
GrahamC
26-Mar-2013
[1692]
Have you upgraded the version of rebol running in them?
MaxV
27-Mar-2013
[1693]
Great work GrahamC, added to http://rebol.informe.com/wiki/view/R3_network_scheme
 so the community may contribute! :-)
Bo
27-Mar-2013
[1694]
@GrahamC: No, they are still running stock.  Seem to be quite reliable, 
much more so than most access points and wireless bridges out there. 
 They've been running for almost 6 years with no maintenance, and 
both units are outdoors.
GrahamC
27-Mar-2013
[1695]
That's pretty impressive.  I always wondered what exactly the embedded 
Rebol did in those boxes.
Bo
28-Mar-2013
[1696]
The WhyWire boxes ran OpenBSD off a CF card with Rebol installed. 
 I know Rebol was used at least for configuring the units.  I don't 
know if Rebol actually handled any of the wireless communication 
parts.
AdrianS
30-Mar-2013
[1697]
It's great to see we've decided to stop "Waiting for Godot". Thanks, 
Ladislav!
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1698x2]
I think someone else also had this problem, but I'm getting this 
when building this source on Linux:
undefined reference to `dtoa'
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1700x2]
I guess that you did not do make make and make prep?
(that is necessary to include the new source code file)
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1702]
No, it's not needed for Carl's source
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1703]
it is needed for this
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1704]
Thanks, I'll try
Andreas
30-Mar-2013
[1705]
Hmm, we need to update the default makefile as well. Thanks for reporting, 
Kaj.
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1706]
(I solved the conflict with Andreas' change by just taking his makefile)
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1707]
I'll hold on then
Andreas
30-Mar-2013
[1708]
No need to hold, make make will also resolve this.
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1709]
Kaj, you should not hold, just do what I suggested
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1710]
Yeah, but I don't want to complicate my build script further. I already 
have to track many branches of REBOL
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1711]
make make and make prep are already strongly suggested anyway
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1712]
I try to keep my build procedures as minumal as possible
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1713]
then I have to wash my hands...
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1714]
Pardon?
Ladislav
30-Mar-2013
[1715x2]
a part of the Easter story...
(no need to understand)
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1717]
I understand, but I was hoping to update R3 with the minimum fuzz
Andreas
30-Mar-2013
[1718]
Pushed an updated makefile.
Kaj
30-Mar-2013
[1719]
If Andreas updates the makefile in one of the next commits, my build 
recipe just downloads that. Ah, thanks
Andreas
30-Mar-2013
[1720]
However, the reliable way to do a full & clean build is `make make` 
followed by `make clean prep r3`.