World: r4wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1499] | I'd sponsor work on engineering a new chat system. |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1500] | But I agree that a 'built-in' way to gather the community is key. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1501] | Copy what it does - it's not that complex. Anyone wanna make a few extra bucks? |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1502x2] | I think some people around here had volunteered with the condition of someone sponsoring the effort. |
It seems a shame though, given that the code exists. | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1504] | I'm past that now - R2 code exists, but we'll never get it. Let's move on and make all new contributions permanent. |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1505] | Maybe BrianH would consider this. R3 could be fixed up as needed along the way. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1506x2] | How much do we need to get chat going? |
Money, I mean. | |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1508x2] | I guess it depends on the specs. |
What already existed in R3 chat? | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1510x2] | http://www.rebol.com/r3/chat.r |
That's what we see with "source chat" in R3 | |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1512x4] | The thing is that a more widely useful chat/collaboration feature implies a very good UI. That's not something that we have too many people capable of at the moment. |
That is just the front end. | |
Nick, did you see my post here of a few days ago on Algodoo? | |
There's a reason for me asking... | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1516x3] | Yep, I looked at it briefly. Definitely a cool addition to the sorts of "modern" things Doc and other have been looking at. |
REBOL and Red needs any sort of "sparkle" possible to make people take a look. | |
What's your reason? | |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1519x4] | Well, my greater point with it is its involvement in education. Your chat just now, with Scot and James, made me think some more about it. |
They, Algoryx, already seem to have a pretty good foothold in education. | |
Promoting Rebol to them, along with a chat/collaboration feature, just makes sense, both for them and for Rebol. | |
or Red for that matter, but it's not quite there yet. | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1523] | You should take a look at what Scot has been saying tonight... |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1524x2] | I'm thinking that maybe approaching them with the benefits of using Rebol as the buil-in scripting language with the possibility of sponsoring the chat/collaborative features, might be attractive. |
I read all that. It's what made me think this is a good idea, even more than before. | |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1526x2] | From what I have observed, and what Scot was saying, is that we need something that is already built but which allows educators to educate. |
The number of teachers I know that actually can code is quite small. | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1528] | That's Scot's idea, but attracting more people to writing REBOL code, in any way, is a good thing. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1529] | Yes, I agree. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1530] | I like the idea of Algodoo, just because it's got some "flashy"ness |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1531x2] | If you see the amount of scripting that's been done for Algodoo, you'd be impressed - and that language has nowhere near Rebol's strengths. |
So, what I'm saying is that given a stimulating environment, like Algodoo, for example, people will code quite a lot. | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1533] | Is it possible to integrate REBOL as a scripting language, without too much trouble? |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1534] | Couldn't tell you, but in an indirect way, I would think that Rebol would be easier to do than quite a few other languages. This is because the current scripting language, Thyme, is very much Lua-like. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1535] | Have you or anyone at Algoryx looked at what's required? I didn't look into it that far. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1536] | Is it a not a gui-based tool? |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1537x2] | No, haven't looked myself, but I know from reading things here and there, that Emil has the idea of re-working/re-thinking the scripting language. |
So, I would think a conversation with him would be worthwhile. | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1539] | If you can speak with him, and get some technical details, maybe there's some potential, especially if he gets help from the group. |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1540] | If they felt that some other entity would sponsor at least part of the work (on the assumption that what gets created is then made available to the Rebol community), they might be interested. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1541] | First step is to find out how big a project it is... |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1542x2] | Sure. There are different milestones for a language integration. The first, to get the language hooked up to the API is probably not a huge effort. The second, to make existing projects work in the new language, is a different matter. |
Anyhow, that's one place where we could push. Another is the Khan Academy. What's your opinion of them? | |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1544] | The TED videos about Khan Academy are inspiring. |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1545] | James, Algodoo is very graphical simulation tool, but is very scriptable (the current language used is called thyme). |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1546] | And they seem to have some marketing savvy |
AdrianS 28-Feb-2013 [1547x2] | Well, they chose to, for now use JavaScript to teach programming |
They're backed by the Gates foundation | |
older newer | first last |