World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 GUI]
older newer | first last |
Ashley 29-Jan-2010 [229] | Thanks, your example (and explanation) makes it all clear now (I only tested/debugged with a single string before). |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [230] | Is the lack of a table face ( or whatever the new jargon is ), a reflection of the difficulty of building it, or some other issues with the gui engine? |
Henrik 3-Feb-2010 [231x2] | lack of time. building it should be fairly trivial. |
the resize engine is still the main issue for troubles and so the best result looks something like this: http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/166.png | |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [233] | Henrik, we can disable resizing until that is fixed! |
Henrik 3-Feb-2010 [234x2] | no we can't. the layout engine depends on it for weighting elements at their "correct" sizes. the resize engine must be fixed in order to fix layout. |
Weighting happens by "pushing" other elements aside, like soap bubbles pushing against eachother. The bigger the element is, the more it pushes. But space is also divided between the number of elements available in a given group, so a group of 5 buttons takes a little more space than a group of 3 buttons. That gives the problem you see with strange spacing before and after the vertical scroller, because it's size is not big enough to provide push. and the other elements are too small to provide enough push. Combining the size of the face and the push factor is why resizing is broken. But there are more bugs in it than that. If you push too much, the elements overflow and will be clipped by the right and bottom edges. Furthermore, the calculation of space to the right edge and bottom edge is also broken. It's almost impossible to predict in your head how the layout will look. I'd like to replace the resize engine with something more concrete, perhaps with springs instead and fixed pixel sizes (oh, maybe similarly to what the VID Extension Kit does) or depending on whether Carl get's started again with his specs list (which I unfortunately can't locate). I hope we'll get to start this month. | |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [236] | Gabriele, were you going to upload your GUI system as well? |
Gabriele 3-Feb-2010 [237] | Where? It's on r3-alpha, as well as Carl's old CVS repository. Feel free to copy it from r3-alpha if you want, and Carl is ok. |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [238] | ok, thanks |
Gabriele 3-Feb-2010 [239] | (the code is owned by RT) |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [240x2] | license attached to the code? |
wow .. done 2 years ago now | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [242x2] | Then we can ask Carl for permission to put it in a community repository in DevBase. |
I thought Gabriele held the copyright... Work for hire? | |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [244] | Graham - shouldn't we better finish/fix Carl's VID, if that one is going to become official distro? |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [245x4] | I was just curious to see how Gab's systemm worked .. and I tried %test.r but >> do %test.r Script: "Test vid" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL View System Functions" Version: none Date: none Script: "rewrite-tree function" Version: none Date: none Script: "Simple dialect to create/resize gobs" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Definition of FACE prototype object" Version: none Date: n one Script: "REBOL VID 3: Functions" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Events Handling" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Styles" Version: none Date: none ** Script error: cannot MAKE/TO map! from: none! ** Where: make either make handler parse parse-set-dialect make-styles catch eit her either applier do catch either either applier do ** Near: make map! style-spec/options |
I see R3-gui has a gob called 'code-area which uses a monospaced font. | |
I could use text-list instead of table if that can be used with a monospaced font. | |
Also, I've read thru the docs ( but not the sources ) and it's not documented on how to create a GUI event | |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [249x3] | Graham - there are scripts that work ... you need to have some older alphas ... There is e.g. nice demo of effect lab .... |
hmm, but now AVG is reporting virus ifection for old A30 release .... | |
must be once again false positive ... | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [252] | That's the false positive I was complaininbg about in Advocacy. You can't dispute it without paying them money. If anyone has a commercial AVG support contract, please dispute that. |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [253] | strange that new alphas don't show any such problems ... |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [254x2] | Glad of that, since if one showed as a false positive based on a signiature scan it's likely that they all would. |
It's possible that the compressed mezzanine data cooincidentally included a sequence of bytes that matched some signiature of someone else's code, which wouldn't matter to us since that code is decompressed, not executed. | |
Rebolek 3-Feb-2010 [256] | I may try to ask a friend who works at AVG, but I cannot promise anything. |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [257] | no-edit: [ #"^H" left #"^X" #"^C" #"^V" ignore #"^M" ignore delete deslect delete-end deselect ] filed as ticket 1455 ... |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [258x3] | It looks I can use a monospaced font in a text list by changing the text-list-box face/text-style to 'code instead of 'list-item ... but quite unclear to me how one does this easily |
Is there an easier way to do this than this? code-text-list: tight [ about: "List of selectable text lines with scrollbar using a monospaced font." facets: [ max-size: 150x3000 ] options: [ list-data: [block!] ] content: [ text-list-box :list-data :area-color options [ text-style: 'code ] scroller ] actors: [ on-init: [ if select face 'reactors [ extend face/faces/1 'reactors face/reactors ] ] on-set: [ set-face/list face/faces/1 arg ] on-get: [ get-face face/faces/1 ] ] ] | |
I think it's a little potentially confusing that 'options in a style refers to the stuff that follows a widget when it is used, but the options keyword following the widget refers to the facets | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [261] | parameters instead? |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [262] | sure |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [263] | pars or params, to make it shorter to write :-) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [264x2] | you wouldn't need to write it often! Unless you were writing a lot of your own styles |
so, above it would be parameters: [ list-data: [block!] ] | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [266x2] | vocabulary shows that param, parm, is a regular english word .... |
but other than that, anything is ok with me :-) | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [268] | so that you know that text-list takes a block |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [269x2] | Make sure the word is not used anywhere else in the R3 GUI. Font changing, AFAIR is a little cumbersome. In the R3 GUI, fonts are a resource, similar to colors, certain draw blocks or materials. |
So first you have to define the resource if it doesn't already exist, and then ask for it by name. | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [271] | hence my preference to use long names :) |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [272] | we had one other word to "options" IIRC. I just can't remember it now. It was used for top gob (window) parameters ... then we unified to options ... what was it? |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [273] | There is no occurence of the word 'parameter in the r3 source |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [274x2] | ah, forget it, it was "flags" ... but that is something different ... |
So - we already started continuation work on Carl's VID? :-) | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [276] | we are free to make suggestions... but it would be nice with a place to store them. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [277x2] | or we could use text-list settings [ ... ] insread of options |
Pekr, I'm the last person to make GUi contributions! | |
older newer | first last |