r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 Schemes] Implementors guide

Gabriele
7-Jan-2010
[279x4]
brian: there is no link to wetan, it is in the r3-alpha file share.
(graham's link above is not complete. there are a few pieces missing, 
and they are missing because the code, even tough it works, is crap 
:)
documentation in the code itself using comments

 - that only works in very simple cases. I did the network detective 
 like that...
Maxim: sorry, I don't understand your point. the code is not available 
to us, so only Carl can write the basic docs...
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[283x4]
Steve ...good point.
Steeve ...
they can do ..

port: open daytime://
wait port 

:)
I've logged onto r3 chat a few times .. seems dead to me.
Pekr
7-Jan-2010
[287x2]
dead? it works, but noone is posting, no?
or you mean dead by activity?
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[289]
dead as in dead quiet
Pekr
7-Jan-2010
[290]
it is dead because all R3 dev. activity is stalled ....
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[291x2]
It is also quite hard to cut and paste as the console doesn't support 
it ..except as a dos console
Have to use the clipboard to transfer stuff to and from the r3 alpha 
console
Pekr
7-Jan-2010
[293]
yes, console under Windows is really bad ... also no multiline support 
for REBOL code ...
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[294]
Is it better under linux?
Pekr
7-Jan-2010
[295]
don't know ...
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[296x3]
Not much.
If you want to suggest a plan for better console, please do.
It would not require much on the reblib side to support a console 
-- most of the code is on the host side.
Pekr
7-Jan-2010
[299]
R2 console code is not reusable?
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[300]
The necessary reblib calls would be for things like word completion, 
since the symbol table is internal to the lib.
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[301]
ditto
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[302]
R2 could be used... but, I had "imagined" there were better packages 
that we could use and get a full featured console.
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[303x2]
well I don't use word completion ... didn't even know it existed 
for files
Le's be practical and reuse R2
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[305]
Is that the most practical?  What ever happened to operating systems 
that provide a real console lib?
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[306]
the most practical is to make it usable for users and optimize later 
on
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[307]
Certainly, we can use our 1998ish console code to start. But, seems 
a bit backward.
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[308x2]
lacking cut and paste as now is somewhat even more backward!
Feels like the original console of 1998 which also lacked cut and 
paste if  I recall correctly
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[310]
What, you can't write everything in one line?
Maxim
7-Jan-2010
[311]
hehe
Steeve
7-Jan-2010
[312]
uhuh
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[313]
writing a scheme in one line ... nope
Steeve
7-Jan-2010
[314]
and what about a graphic console (with gobs) ?
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[315]
You paste schemes?!
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[316]
you're being silly
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[317]
S: that was my goal.
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[318]
I'm responding the same
Maxim
7-Jan-2010
[319]
C: I have, for testing, it worked very well in R2
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[320x3]
Actually I was trying to paste in your code samples from the wiki 
...
you need to reformat them all as one liners
lol
Carl
7-Jan-2010
[323x3]
Yes, I have same issue on bug testing from curecode.
Of course, if that's all you really need, then just write a do-clip 
function.
But, I suspect people want some other features, no?
Graham
7-Jan-2010
[326]
who cares what others want .. this is Graham's group :)
Kaj
7-Jan-2010
[327x2]
Current OSes have console libs, but they're different depending on 
the platform
So the issue is whether to standardise or diversify