r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases

Henrik
26-Nov-2006
[7x2]
hmm.. why do the binaries for 2.7.0, 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 all take up 
the exact same size of 655360 bytes?
REBOL/View 2.7.x that is
[unknown: 5]
26-Nov-2006
[9]
Thanks Gabriele.
Gabriele
26-Nov-2006
[10]
henrik, maybe it's just a coincidence...
Gregg
27-Nov-2006
[11]
I believe the PE file format has sections that are padded, so it 
may be that the internal padding is different, as are the code segments, 
but the resulting EXE is the same size. I suppose you could do a 
binary diff to see.
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[12]
maybe Carl just likes oddities like this and makes them happen  ;-)
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[13x2]
Anyone else have issues with this script? -- http://www.ross-gill.com/r/boston-cam.r
** Script Error: query has no value
** Near: querying: to logic! query
>>
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[15]
got the same message!
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[16]
The script itself seems quite benign.
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[17x3]
it came very immediately. seems to come even before attempting to 
load the script from server
same with LOAD on the script
if I READ it first and then LOAD it, no problems
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[20]
It seems to be in the HTTP protocol.
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[21]
this is the faulty line:

img: load http://images.earthcam.com/ec_metros/massachusetts/boston/pru.jpg
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[22]
same with any URL actually.
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[23]
strange, using read/binary returns an empty string!
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[24]
should it be reported? It doesn't seem all that important :-)
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[25x2]
(empty binary!, sorry)
LOL
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[27]
funny it didn't come up earlier
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[28]
true!
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[29]
REBOL/View 2.7.2.3.1 25-Nov-2006
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[30]
same here
Maxim
27-Nov-2006
[31]
me too
Chris
27-Nov-2006
[32x3]
Also, in the editor window, hitting the  'home' key produces a null 
character, and 'end' does nothing.
Nor Page Up/Down.
I guess it's early days :)
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[35x3]
I'm putting the DO/LOAD thing on the blog
done
OSX version is out
Geomol
27-Nov-2006
[38]
Nice! I'll start doing some tests with View and OSX in the next days 
hopefully.
Henrik
27-Nov-2006
[39x2]
yet another build, this time with timers
my rotation zoomer finally works under OSX :-) A dream come true. 
but the colors are screwed!
ICarii
27-Nov-2006
[41x2]
do the timers exist in the win2.7.4 build or only the osx build? 
 couldn't seem to find any relevant ? timer* info..
or by timers is carl just referring to the VID based rate/time events 
rather than a Core accessible timer?
Gabriele
28-Nov-2006
[43]
face/rate. afaik that didn't work in some osx builds.
Oldes
28-Nov-2006
[44]
will be the rate finally increased?
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[45]
timers work alright. several demos in the Public/Demos directory 
use timers
Rebolek
28-Nov-2006
[46]
Oldes? do you mean under Windows? That would be great.
Oldes
28-Nov-2006
[47]
Henrik: I know, one of these is mine...but there was(is) inbuilt 
limit how fast the rate can be.
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[48x2]
looks like the windows version is at 2.7.4 now
still has the DO/LOAD bug...
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[50]
I think we started really strange route. Now we will have nice toy 
to play with, spend our time, introducing new bugs, whereas 3.0 slips 
further in the schedule, as RT has to correct bugs present with 2.7 
and its changes ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[51]
pekr, did you read the latest 3.0 blog entry?
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[52x2]
yes, and?
that blog was probably provoked by my earlier comment in the blog 
... at least Carl confirmed, that 2.7 will see only mostly those 
changes, which could be used as a codebase for 3.0 too ...
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[54]
I'm not sure what you mean by slipping. I wouldn't expect 3.0 to 
be usable for production work within a year anyway (I think I mentioned 
that before)
Pekr
28-Nov-2006
[55]
2.7 consumes RTs time probably anyway, not sure it is worth it, because 
as we can see, we are introducing new inconsistencies/bugs
Henrik
28-Nov-2006
[56]
so holding off 3.0 for a few weeks to get 2.7 out, gets my approval, 
particularly if some of my bugs are fixed :-)