World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
Graham 29-Apr-2010 [1615] | I'll try and remember that when I learn German :) |
BrianH 29-Apr-2010 [1616x2] | Still really off-topic for this group. We're trying to keep this group on-topic for the discussion of R2 releases, so valuable information doesn't get buried in the torrent. |
The is not like the !REBOL3 group, where anything R3-related is on-topic. | |
Graham 29-Apr-2010 [1618] | Was anything happening R2 wise? |
BrianH 29-Apr-2010 [1619] | We switch between R2 and R3 work. The last week has been focused on R3. A week-or-so ago I made a few tweaks to R2/Forward for 2.7.8, including a backported fix from R3, and Carl put together a plan and implemented a lot of his portion of the plan. I expect that soon after the R3 a98 release, we'll have a R2 2.7.8 release. And 2.7.8 looks like it will be the first really stable release in the whole 2.7.x series, something to really look forward to. |
GiuseppeC 1-May-2010 [1620] | Hello, I am having a small problem about CALL: call reduce ["C:\Windows\hh.exe" "C:/mybook.chm"] doesn't work call/show reduce ["C:\Windows\hh.exe" "C:/mybook.chm"] works ! Which is the difference ? |
Graham 1-May-2010 [1621x2] | you don't need 'reduce |
call/show rejoin ["C:\Windows\hh.exe " "C:/mybook.chm"] there's a bug with 'call | |
GiuseppeC 1-May-2010 [1623] | Sorry, I hava modified the command. Originally I needed reduce. |
Graham 1-May-2010 [1624] | well, rejoin does a reduce |
GiuseppeC 1-May-2010 [1625] | The problem is different: call/show opens the guide call only run the task but does not open the guide. You can find the task in Task Manager |
Graham 1-May-2010 [1626x2] | I think in 2.6 the behaviour of 'call changed ... |
it should be fixed | |
GiuseppeC 1-May-2010 [1628] | hh.exe open a .CHM guide |
Graham 1-May-2010 [1629] | http://www.rebol.com/article/0467.html |
GiuseppeC 1-May-2010 [1630] | Read. It didn't open the child window... ok... back to work... |
GiuseppeC 2-May-2010 [1631] | What's wrong here ? rebol [ ] write %tryme.pdf dirlist: read %// foreach myfile dirlist [ if find myfile ".pdf" [ print ["Filename" myfile] extension: find/last/tail myfile "." print ["EXT" extension] print extension = "pdf" ] ] delete %tryme.pdf halt The comparison extension = pdf should return TRUE, instead I have FALSE |
Graham 2-May-2010 [1632x2] | try suffix? myfile |
%.pdf = suffix? myfile | |
GiuseppeC 2-May-2010 [1634] | I have found the function but I wish to know why te comparison fails |
Graham 2-May-2010 [1635x2] | because myfile is of type file!, and so extension is also file! |
try print extension = %.pdf | |
GiuseppeC 2-May-2010 [1637] | Ok, understood. The fact I am able to start a "find" on it let me think it is a string... |
Graham 2-May-2010 [1638] | This belongs in rebol school group |
GiuseppeC 2-May-2010 [1639] | O:-) |
Graham 2-May-2010 [1640] | BrianH wants to keep this group to discuss 2.7.8 |
GiuseppeC 2-May-2010 [1641] | I'll move there :-) |
Gregg 3-May-2010 [1642] | Back on pair comparisons, MIN and MAX don't return one of the given pair values (not sure if someone else mentioned that). >> max 10x11 9x12 == 10x12 |
Maxim 3-May-2010 [1643] | ? max 10 9 = 10 max 11 12 = 12 you get the area which encloses both |
BrianH 3-May-2010 [1644] | And back in the Core group - we're trying to keep this group on its topic of R2 releases. We don't want to lose such discussions in the middle of discussions of semantics. The only reason this group was created is because some of the people working on the development of R2 don't want to use chat yet. This group is *only* a replacement for the R2-Beta world. |
Maxim 3-May-2010 [1645x2] | using MIN on offsets and MAX on size you get the enclosing box when you use MAX on offsets and MIN on size you get the intersection of both boxes |
I think Gregg was posting this as a bug. | |
BrianH 3-May-2010 [1647x2] | This is not the R2 equivalent of the !REBOL3 group. Please don't abuse the fact that we can't move messages in AltME :( |
I'm sorry, I don't want to be a jerk about this. This group is used as a reference when we do new R2 releases. It's of less value as a reference if off-topic stuff is overwhelming the release discussions. Please be nice to the R2 release manager :( | |
Maxim 3-May-2010 [1649] | sorry to add junk, but I *really* think this group should be renamed (this is On Topic :-) probably !REBOL2-release or something like that. its too easy to mistake right now with !REBOL3 being such an active group. |
BrianH 3-May-2010 [1650] | Requested. |
Gregg 3-May-2010 [1651] | Done. |
BrianH 3-May-2010 [1652] | Thanks :) |
Graham 14-May-2010 [1653x2] | If I want to set something to the index of a series, or something else if it's not there I have to do this b: either a: find series var [ index? a ][ default ] when I'd rather do b: any [ index? find series var default ] So how about letting index? also take none as an argument ? |
b: any [ attempt [ index? find series var ] default ] | |
Ladislav 14-May-2010 [1655x2] | funny thing is, that the former code is exactly as long as the latter one, does not need the additional variable, and it is faster |
...and I find it more readable | |
Steeve 14-May-2010 [1657x2] | yep, no need for additional var. all [b: find series var b: index? b] |
oups, not what you'he done | |
Ladislav 14-May-2010 [1659] | indeed, I just meant: b: either b: find series var [index? b] [default] |
Anton 14-May-2010 [1660] | I'm pretty sure I'd be ok with NONE == INDEX? NONE |
BrianH 14-May-2010 [1661] | That kind of change is not going into R2 - it's not backwards-compatible. Try R3. |
Gregg 14-May-2010 [1662] | But it's easy enough to create a safe INDEX? function. I think Gabriele calls his INDEX?? and I borrowed it from him. |
Graham 14-May-2010 [1663x2] | that's another issue .. how to easily redefine words |
that also invoke the original word .... | |
older newer | first last |