World: r3wp

Now they want me to add proxy handling to the rooms but the proxy 
should be handled only by some users (that's why I plan to have a 
controll room and not an extra button in computer rooms)

so at some point, you will have to add some intermediate nodes (plugs 
in liquid) to control the states themselves. before sendin them to 
the actual dependent systems.

so the control room is only available for that user?

I've added flexybility putting the rooms in separate files and not 
in the script (as two school are using the same program), than I 
check the user of the LAN (I use the environment variables)

The xcript runs in a webpage with plugin so the user cannot change 
the envvars

Only some teachers will be able to have some buttons/nodes/handlers

is the gui an actual picture of the school's layout.

The plugin posts data to a CGI on the proxy and that's how I can 
control the proxy and store requests for repair

The gui has the rooms names as buttons. When you press the room name 
its layout (made of buttons) is shown along with a standard feedback 
layout (a form to send requests via CGI POST)

ok, so what do you have to manage about the proxy?

I can maybe put some user-data to buttons to contain attributes

The min goal with the proxy is to open a specific room at a specifica 
time up to a specific hour or up to a limit hour (when the school 
closes)

min=main

Asking more the "open" rooms should be coloured in a different way 
so all teachers know thet Internet is available.

It might be that a single computer should be opened instead of opening 
the whole room

hum... and the proxy configuration is handled by small cgi requests?

Are you thinking about security risks?

I compress the CGI request so it's not readable

I POST compressed data

you see, what I see here is that the actuall application data is 
on the server and your browser based plugins are just synchronised 
to it.

so using cgi for that kind of think (for liquid) is almost impossible, 
cause the viewers need to get the information BACK.

if someone else changes my setup, I have to be able to receive it.

so in reality, each time a computer opens up a view of the current 
state of each thing, it should have its own listener port.

When the gui starts I show servers state. As soon as a teacher clicks 
a button for a room he is changing the state...

but now you add the concept that "another" computer changes your 
state... you have to be made aware of that change.

so unless you can listen to someone, you will never know.

I see...

liquid can help you automate the process easily, but you still need 
to allow each thing, to be aware of itself.

or rather, of the other things it relates to.

Can I poll a status update from the server each, let's say, 2 mins?

The poll results should generate a data flow...

yes

actually, internally that is how liquid functions, it asks for state 
of dependencies.

this is the purpose of the  instigate function.

I am at the point of making my liquid net module for liquid, which 
would alleviate the need for a cgi-based system in your setup.

I am wondering what to do: on one hand I'd really like to create 
a liquid application, on the other hand I must finish the program 
in a few days...

but its nowhere near ready... I'm starting to look at the discrepancies 
of tcp/ip and liquid models.

hehe, right now... with the cgi in between, I don't think you'll 
get a lot more out of building it in liquid...

haw should the net module work? ?services?

if elixir where ready for release, then, yes it would be a simple 
click and drag... but alas, its not there yet..

it will be direct tcp intercommunication in between nodes.

using encryption if you have those options in your license.

I will try to use the liquid concepts adding attributes to the nodes 
and do a "classical" plugin for the proxy

it should be possible to add an adaptor in order to plug a liquid 
system within a reb service, but thats a later stage.

if I had just a bit more time, I'd be glad to help, but comming back 
from the devcon has but a strain on my time (a lot of time to make 
up at work and at home)

plus I am working on getting a quick Revault demo site ASAP.

Nevr mind, Maxim. Talking about this with you suggested me easier 
way to implement such services and this is an help too!

no problem, I'm happy to help.

During the devCon I "saw" some GUI while you were presenting your 
programs, are those scripts available to the public?

but seeing people's real use cases helps me see where to put the 
time on whatever I do next, and your example shows me that I am dead 
on my priorities  :-)