World: r3wp

Yes not many people willing to contribute to Orca, the sad thing 
is that I know of at least 3 more complete clones that have not been 
delivered due authors wish. So Rebol is quite fragmented. And all 
the hopeshare goes to RT. I wish people could gather around just 
one code base, and work like many other comunities, but there is 
something here holding people back.

author wish = Carl?

Nope different authors.

Karl Robillard is the only one that has come out with an actual viable 
clone, and the only one that keeps coding in the open and sharing.

ah, I don't understand them then. Why so? Maybe because they don't 
want hurt RT? The question is, what is hurting the situation more 
:-)

If RT would deliver on their plans, that there would be no objections, 
but :-) Did not know there are other full clones. I knew of one, 
but not three of them :-)

Pekr, my development  choices are:
Cross Platform Stand Alone Apps -> PLT-Scheme
Web Apps -> Ruby-on-Rails
OSX only Apps -> Cocoa or F-Script.

anyway - why not to open plug-in itself? Wasn't it said, that RT 
will keep the kernel, and the rest, including the concole, most parts 
of View, will be open-sourced?

PLT - never heard of that ...

Could not Ruby be used for stand alone apps too?

Who knows, just like we don't understand any of the decisions or 
unkept promises. (We waited how long for OSX-SDK? How long for async, 
etc. So many promises, so little delivered).

I wonder why Python is missing - cross platform, really cross platform, 
including small devices, .Net, very large community, lots of tools 
around, etc.

Pekr, Ruby and stand alone yes. But packaging is not as easy as PLT-Scheme, 
which just gives you a single binary like rebol.

(That ends my ranting, Orca still has a chance if anyone time please 
feel welcome to contribute, I sign-off from this channel now)

I just tried to install the latest plugin for FireFox. I manually 
removed all previous version files but the automatic installation 
didn't work. I managed to get it working after I downloaded the whole 
instalation page locally and run it from my harddisk...very strange. 
Does anyone have simmilar problems? (I'm running Firefox 1.5.0.4 
on WinXP SP1)

Ah, found the problem.

The instalation popup window is not opening when you have set options->content->always 
warn when trying install new plugin (this is rough translation as 
I'm using Czech FireFox) and you don't have added www.rebol.com in 
'trusted servers' in this option dialog.

Maybe this could be noted on the instalation page?

BTW it is interesting that Flash doesn't need such settings as I 
was able to install Flash plugin without having the flash server 
in the 'allowed servers'. Maybe they are using different instalation 
technique?

I think it is in the instructions.  I remember doing this.

Ah yes! You are right :) Sorry, have to read it better next time 
:)

but you're still right that flash does not require this.

Perhaps they have some special dispensation?

Maybe it is because it is 'official plugin' registered on firefox 
site?

I think Rebol should 'officially register' once it gets to release 
state.

well... that won't be a while on account of the delay

hm :/

Yes, good idea. We are going to look at officially registering with 
Mozilla.org, that will eliminate the need to modify Exceptions list 
in FireFox.

for security: Until the plugin is fixed, could it show an own page 
first where it ask "do you really want to run this script?". then 
it would be still easy to show a demo to friends, but not for others 
to sneak scripts in.

Regarding comment above on "... jumping around from plan to plan....":

Sorry, but we are not.  Our plan has not changed in a long time. 
 But, what you see are pieces of the plan in development in parallel. 
 To explain...

REBOL 3.0 architecture consists of 3 tiers: environments, cores, 
plugins.

Environments are modules such as: console, browser, encap... but 
in R3.0 also things like Apache mod, IDE, enbedded, raw I/O, and 
others.

What can we say?  It's the perception amongst developers.

Yes, and I understand how you can draw that conclusion.

How close is R3 anyway?  Is it that close to replacing R2?

A number of us have projects based upon statements made about the 
plugin.

No, it is not that close to R2 for several reasons.... which is also 
why I look for parallel projects related to it.

In cases where development efforts for R2 also benefit R3, then we 
can do them now. That is the case of the Browser.

So, doesn't it make sense then to finish the plugin as it is so close?

Yes, it does makes sense to do so.

The first step in the plugin was to simply get it running again.

The next step was to get it to update properly, and while at it (and 
waiting on me) Josh did an amazing thing by making it deal with multiple 
instances.

So, what is important now is to build a list of shortcomings (e.g. 
security comes to mind), and prioritize.

We also value any inputs and contributions that can be provided by 
developers.

So, how much effort would it be to complete the plugin?  A day, week, 
month?

The current status is that all the demos on rebol.net don't work 
... this is not a good advert.

We need a short list of "items" that define "complete". Once we have 
that, we can work toward making that happen.

Certainly, I would like to see a non-beta of the R2.

in the plugin.