World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
amacleod 13-Dec-2007 [5471x3] | Kaj, ths is not the proper group to ask questions about Syllable but I do not see a Syllable group here... |
And the web site left me with a few questions | |
I'm downloadng the live version to give it a wirl. | |
Kaj 13-Dec-2007 [5474] | New people here do not get into the Syllable group, as some people wanted it to be private |
GiuseppeC 13-Dec-2007 [5475] | Ok, I have found Syllable on the internet. No more questions here. Good night dear collegues. |
Kaj 13-Dec-2007 [5476] | Giuseppe asked about my projects, though |
amacleod 13-Dec-2007 [5477] | I'm an old Amiga guy and Syllable reminds me a bit of Amiga (from the site). I would be interested in joining that group if possible. |
Kaj 13-Dec-2007 [5478x2] | I just added both of you. You can remove yourself if you want |
And, it oncestarted out as an Amiga clone :-) | |
PeterWood 14-Dec-2007 [5480] | Louis: From what I can tell from DocBase; initially the unicode support will be that the Rebol source will be UTF-8 encoded. The next step seems to be changing string! to UTF-8 encoding. It looks as though work hasn't yet started on the unicode! datatype. |
Pekr 14-Dec-2007 [5481] | as for UTF8 - is it compatible to current +128 char extension? I mean e.g. czech alphabet uses special characters above 128 ASCII value .... |
Louis 14-Dec-2007 [5482] | Peter, thanks. The progress of unicode support is vefy important to me. |
Pekr 14-Dec-2007 [5483] | really? well, then you should know that first alpha with unicode support was released for testing :-) |
Louis 14-Dec-2007 [5484] | That is great! :>) Thanks for that news, Pekr. |
BrianH 14-Dec-2007 [5485] | UTF-8 is a strict extention of ASCII, but ASCII is only defined between 0 and 127. Characters 128+ are not ASCII, they are extensions, and their meaning depends on the codepage. The codepage of an 8-bit string is unknown, unless you specify it externally (or do a lot of statistical calculations). Strings or scripts with characters extended by a codepage will have to be translated by a codepage-to-utf-8 function or process specific to the particular codepage, ahead of time. Fortunately, such a process can be fast and even implemented in a byte-oriented language easily. |
GiuseppeC 14-Dec-2007 [5486] | Other than UNICODE, will there be an UNISEX version of the interpreter ? :-) |
Pekr 14-Dec-2007 [5487x2] | what? sex? :-) |
rebol is sexy already :-) | |
GiuseppeC 14-Dec-2007 [5489] | Sometime better than, you have more fun ! |
PeterWood 14-Dec-2007 [5490] | BrianH: I undertstood that UTF-8 can be multi-byte depending on the Unicode of the character being represented. |
BrianH 14-Dec-2007 [5491x2] | Yup. |
ASCII characters fit in one byte, the rest take some more. It can progress up to 5 bytes but those are rare. | |
PeterWood 14-Dec-2007 [5493] | Is my reading of Docbase correct that string! values will be UTF-8 encoded? |
BrianH 14-Dec-2007 [5494] | That is currently under discussion. |
PeterWood 14-Dec-2007 [5495] | Thanks....if there is a vote please add mine to that of Louis. |
Kaj 19-Dec-2007 [5496] | I'm happy to report that the preliminary Linux port of R3 alpha, which offers REBOL/Core functionality, runs on Syllable Server |
Henrik 19-Dec-2007 [5497x2] | nice :-) |
Kaj, you're welcome to document any bumps in the porting process. We will need it all for porting to other systems. | |
Kaj 19-Dec-2007 [5499x2] | I will, but I didn't do any porting yet. This is just an ad-hoc binary build I got |
I will need the open host source code to get further | |
amacleod 27-Dec-2007 [5501] | Is it time for some news/update? A little tickle to stoke the excitement for us on the outside. |
Henrik 27-Dec-2007 [5502x2] | well, I have a new rebcore.exe file in my r3 internal release directory, which is different from the other internal releases. I'm not yet sure what that means. :-) (seriously) |
I know people are cooking up some nice examples for a public release, but it's not ready yet. | |
[unknown: 5] 28-Dec-2007 [5504x2] | Have the Alphas been release to more people yet? |
I want to text the alpha to see if it still has a nasty bug that I couldn't post in Rambo because it reveals source code. | |
Henrik 28-Dec-2007 [5506] | no not yet. tell me about this bug, please? perhaps I can test it for you. |
[unknown: 5] 28-Dec-2007 [5507x2] | Well it has to do with ports |
It seems that a port function that I created cause it to output C source code | |
Henrik 28-Dec-2007 [5509x3] | ports are very different in R3, so I don't know. |
interesting | |
well, the port system is completely rewritten from scratch, so perhaps this bug no longer exists. | |
[unknown: 5] 28-Dec-2007 [5512] | As if the C source code was in REBOL |
Henrik 28-Dec-2007 [5513] | sounds very odd and interesting :-) |
[unknown: 5] 28-Dec-2007 [5514] | I sent Carl an example of the problem some time back via feedback but never heard anything more about it |
Henrik 28-Dec-2007 [5515] | is it simple to reproduce and can it be reproduced reliably? normally bugs must be both before he will look at it. |
[unknown: 5] 28-Dec-2007 [5516] | I posted directly to you |
Henrik 28-Dec-2007 [5517] | Some news: Maarten has stepped up to become release manager, while Carl "retreats" to kernel development. This means that work is under way to provide a public alpha release, but no time table is yet known. |
Maarten 30-Dec-2007 [5518x2] | Yes, and I will need some volunteers to do parts of the work. More will be posted here soon (vacancies); if you see anything you like message me privately. |
Wait just a few more days.... | |
Pekr 30-Dec-2007 [5520] | I can volunteer to sit on the ml and reboltalk.com to monitor those lists, answer some questions, and eventually put those significant ones here (or to r3-alpha) for the consideration ... I like having Henrik around, as he has different pov on the things, so various angles could be covered .... |
older newer | first last |