r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3-OLD1]

Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4068x2]
Imagine - if Cyphre worked on View kernel alone, he imo concentrated 
upon rich-text, proper AGG integration, etc.
yes, interesting. In fact, I am not that skilled to know the answer 
- under Windows, I once looked into API, and there seems to be some 
API for printing, however that has nothing in common with Postcript 
- you get bitmap area and then you somehow submit it to driver ...
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4070]
9 years and no decent printer support
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4071x2]
that would be native support for printing imo. So - what's with postscript? 
We would have to be sure, that such engine can translate ANY possible 
UI you create in View ... is that possible? If not, you simply have 
to write some kind of dialect - and here we are once again - you 
will do the work twice ...
so, if we don't wrap upon OS specific printing support imo, then 
we already have our solution - generate html, pdf, postscript, but 
always - do the work twice ...
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4073x2]
the problem with pdf and html is that we don't have native viewers
but with postscript, we might be able to get a decent preview in 
draw
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4075x2]
that is true ... but ghostscript is not native too, no?
ah, so you mean - give me the ability to use such draw commands, 
which will automatically translate into postscript ...
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4077x4]
I'm not suggesting writing a postscript interpreter ...
that would work .. automatic translation of draw into postscript
Of course we could just have display postscript :)
next pcs had that years ago
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4081x2]
I remember, in SAP, they had their SAP Script - the tool you used 
to do your forms for printing. They left it, and integrated PDF instead. 
I wonder if the requirement for PDF reader is problem for you? I 
know it is a dependency, but it is imo being regarded de-facto standard, 
no?
so, as for me, I would maybe prefer PS too, otoh, from the practical 
pov, I would maybe prefer PDF, because I can generate .pdf file, 
and send it to others too ....
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4083]
I guess the question is whether one wants to use pdf as a print preview 
mechanism . or use draw
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4084]
I had something different in mind - simply when you want to prepare 
and send electronic files for your customers, at least for me pdf 
is de-facto standard. So by having ability to generate pdf, I have 
two works done in one way. Of course there is that Adobe Reader dependency, 
but .... however, I understand your case ...
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4085]
generating pdf from ps is easy enough with ghostscript installed
btiffin
15-Aug-2007
[4086]
Umm, it's not directly R3 related, but I think Gabriele's PDF-Maker.r 
is a fairly large step toward cross-platform printing.  It's three 
flavour right now, pdf-maker.r in rebol.org, pdf-maker version 2 
on Gabriele's site (the target for future work and with some wicked 
powerful REBOL directed typesetting) and inside the rebol.org qml-ed 
package with the ease of qml input, pumping out pdf.


V2 at http://www.colellachiara.com/soft/PDFM2/is where x-platform 
printing may come from, methinks.
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4087]
except this commits us to using a 3rd party viewer
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4088]
but it is like saying that something commits us to use web browser 
- there is no decent platform without Adobe Reader or the clone. 
Even on Amiga :-)
Graham
15-Aug-2007
[4089]
I'd like more options while draw is in the cooking pot as it were.
Cyphre
15-Aug-2007
[4090x2]
I don't know PS/PDF formats in depth but is there any problem to 
write PS/PDF->DRAW viewer even with R2 DRAW abilities?
AFAIK one guy here at Rebol3 world did even own chinese(or was it 
japanese?) font viewer/editor using R2 DRAW....
Henrik
15-Aug-2007
[4092x4]
There are some problems with text alignment and sizes.
Under R2 Draw, it's impossible to center and right align text correctly.
Draw and View sizes for text do not match.
I think this is all solved in R3 draw, but I don't know about text 
sizes.
Gabriele
15-Aug-2007
[4096x2]
graham: previewing ps is as hard as previewing pdf, as long as the 
source is a rebol dialect.
graham: i don't know any user whit gs installed. every single pc 
i have ever seen has a pdf reader of some kind installed (usually 
just adobe)
Henrik
15-Aug-2007
[4098x2]
I'm personally more interested in using Windows printing directly 
and feed data to that. I don't know yet though how that works, but 
I'll be working on a solution for that for R3.
right now I'm stuck in a mix of GS, Printfile and using postscript.r 
to generate printable output.
Louis
15-Aug-2007
[4100]
I'm still trying to figure out a way to kick Pekr for making me think 
the 14th was THE DAY!  :>)  LOL
james_nak
15-Aug-2007
[4101]
I've been away so long was this the rumor?
Pekr
15-Aug-2007
[4102]
it was a joke, of course. The bad part of the joke, which makes it 
joke a less, is the fact I dared to post it to Announce channel :-)
james_nak
15-Aug-2007
[4103]
As opposed to the 'Humour' channel... :)
Louis will 3.0 have what you need for your program?
Maarten
15-Aug-2007
[4104]
I can't help being disappointed (although I trust the team to do 
great work)
Geomol
15-Aug-2007
[4105x2]
I need something being tested on older versions of REBOL. So if some 
of you could run this little piece of code and report, what the end 
value is, and what version of REBOL under what OS and on what hardware. 
The piece of code:

x: 1.0 while [(1.0 + (x / 2.0)) > 1.0] [x: x / 2.0]
On my G4 iBook, system/version is 2.7.5.2.4 and I get: 3.5527136788005E-15
james_nak
15-Aug-2007
[4107x2]
REBOL/Core 2.5.0.3.1

>> x: 1.0 while [(1.0 + (x / 2.0)) > 1.0] [x: x / 2.0]
== 3.5527136788005E-15
XP P 4 2.66 1 GB
Geomol
15-Aug-2007
[4109x2]
REBOL/View 1.3.1.3.1 17-Jun-2005 Core 2.6.0 under Win2000 (not sure 
which CPU):
1.77635683940025E-15
REBOL/Core 2.5.6.7.1 under FreeBSD i386:
3.5527136788005E-15
Rebolek
15-Aug-2007
[4111]
>> system/version ;View 1.3.2.3.1 5-Dec-2005 Core 2.6.3
== 1.3.2.3.1
>> x: 1.0 while [(1.0 + (x / 2.0)) > 1.0] [x: x / 2.0]
== 1.77635683940025E-15
;Athlon64 2.0GHz/w32 5.1
PatrickP61
15-Aug-2007
[4112]
REBOL/View 1.3.2.3.1 5-Dec-2005 Core 2.6.3
Copyright 2000-2005 REBOL Technologies.  All rights reserved.
REBOL is a trademark of REBOL Technologies. WWW.REBOL.COM
>> x: 1.0 while [(1.0 + (x / 2.0)) > 1.0] [x: x / 2.0]
== 1.77635683940025E-15

Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Version 2002 Service Pack 2   Compaq 
Presario AMD Athlon XP 2200+  1.80 GHz  1.00 GB of RAMS
Louis
15-Aug-2007
[4113]
James, not sure yet. Probably not, as I need unicode support.
Sunanda
16-Aug-2007
[4114x2]
REBOL/Core 2.5.6.3.1 / win XP / AMD-TL50 
3.5527136788005E-15
REBOL/View 1.3.1.3.1 17-Jun-2005 Core 2.6.0  -- same op sys and machine 
as above:
1.77635683940025E-15
sqlab
16-Aug-2007
[4116]
Windows XP Pro,  Prozessor	x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 9 GenuineIntel 
~2807 Mhz

REBOL/Command 2.6.2.3.1
1.77635683940025E-15
REBOL/Pro 2.6.2.3.1
1.77635683940025E-15
REBOL/Core 2.6.0.3.1
1.77635683940025E-15
REBOL/Pro 2.5.125.3.1
1.77635683940025E-15

REBOL/Core 2.5.0.3.1
3.5527136788005E-15

REBOL/Pro 2.5.8.3.1
8.88178419700125E-16

REBOL/Core 2.3.0.3.1
false

REBOL/Core 2.2.7.3.1
false
Ladislav
16-Aug-2007
[4117]
Geomol: you discovered "rounded equality", unfortunately, there were 
some adjustments to it recently (some made by mistake, some intentional)