World: r3wp

yes, and its part of the angst.

I also have my issues with small talk.

Gabriele, it's probably a matter of:

- What will he trust us to do?

- Does he have specific things that he would like to see done with 
R3?

- Does he expect that it has to be paid work, or voluntary work? 
Because I think he would easily be able to find volunteers as long 
as projects are small, focused and beneficial to as many R3 users 
as possible.


For example does he plan to build his own IDE for R3? Does he plan 
to make R3 run natively on PCs himself or Amigas or Macs? Because 
if we can get a straight "no" or "yes", we could act accordingly.

there are many ways to position DF.

but small talk is also OOP.  liquid isn't.

it could have, but I realised in the end its simpler and much easier 
to "get"  its like functions upside down.

but anhow, we are straying off the target...   do you know why Carl 
is in such a rush to have view done for june 30th?

are there contractuals, VCs, clients like AMD waiting on it, etc?

maybe MS is :-)

because there are things that are going to be built on R3

I am sure none in the community really expects view for a while...

eg. AltME 3

well, actually I think it is good RT wants to release it ASAP.

yes, but that's how VID got done.

:-(

PITL usually implies a bit more mature design process, than, lets 
scramble something ASAP... quick throw it out the door ;-)

I fear just one thing - that if new VID is not conceptually sufficient, 
new stuff gets build upon it, and then we will be reluctant to changes 
because of compatibility problems.

It's never been said anywhere, if the june/july release will be alpha, 
beta or final 3.0 version (and I don't expect the later), so I'm 
not afraid that some early prototype of new VID that will be released, 
will be also the final version. R3 final may come later enough to 
fix those problems.

anyhow... I'll come back later... I've got to work...  bye everyone.

max, petr, all your comments so far can be summarized as, you don't 
trust me and Carl with coming with a good enough design. Can I tell 
this to Carl?

Gabriele - well, whatever. That is the most "stupid" summary you 
could put on the table.

its not a question of trust, Gabriele.

so you trust me and Carl but you fear the design will be bad?

Gabriele I think that he's more afraid that he (or anybody else) 
cannot comment your and Carl's design. I think he just wants that 
whater you come up with won't be final, but will be open to suggestions 
from community.

Well, you can raise such summary against me, as I know others "talk 
is cheap" arguments, and I rarely produce any code anymore, but that 
just shows your disrespect to Henrik's and other's concerns ...

whater=whatever

and changes, real open changes.

I am off from the discussion, that does not make sense to me anymore 
...

hehe pekr just tilted  ;-)

Calm down Pkr :)

Rebolek, this started with me saying that I wanted to have more people 
to comment on VID

I am calm enough I think.

petr, ok, i'm not sure how i can summarize the above.

Gabriele, I hope you don't think that we think you can't build a 
proper system.

i think both of you said that you fear that the design will be rushed 
and not good enough.

I've said it above, its not "good" that I want.  its "open", "extensible", 
and I mean that from the inside.

As I understand it, people are just afraid that their suggestions 
will end up in a trashcan and not that you and Carl cannot design 
it well.

not changing colors.

if you didn't say that, then i can't read today, so i'll get back 
here tomorrow or so hoping to be better.

I mean allowing us to change what a color means.

Please don't shot me as I must quickly step out my home: VID was 
designed in 1 week but its limits have been under our and RT eyes 
for years I don't think the newly designed VID/whatever-it's-called 
will be done ignoring the errors of the past. Propose your needs, 
collect them and submit them to Gregg or Gabriele to be told to Carl

allowing me to use a gui and open it up in OpenGL, activeX, if I 
have the need/resources/time to provide it.  I mean to be able to 
extend the whole engine so I can skin it without needing to rebuild 
100% of the gadgets, etc... many of the things we spoke at the devcon, 
but more too.

so... you're afraid our goal is not the same as your goal? our goal 
is to allow the development of applications.

this started with me saying that I wanted to have more people to 
comment on VID

 - nice, but you also said that some interest group or comitee won't 
 take us anywhere (which may be right), so people may fear that nobody's 
 listening to them (and I think someone will agree that lack of communication 
 is biggest RT problem)

obviously.

i stated that voting for design decisions is not going to work, i 
haven't stated that comments are not going to be listened to (why 
would i want more comments for?)

(so i have offended petr.)

hehe.

the sad thing is that i still don't have something to tell Carl.

Gabriele - I don't want to get to part, when we start to argue upon 
what started what. But for me, the discussion started yesterday, 
when you discussing with Max in liquid group, felt like collecting 
good ideas for your own design. I can't read anywhere, that actually 
what you did, you asked for more opinions! I felt quite opposite, 
witch you accusing us of some need of commitee to vote for what is 
good or not. The "commiteee" is old trick of Carl, sorry ;-) Noone 
was talking about it ...