World: r3wp
[#Boron] Open Source REBOL Clone
older | first |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [730] | And please stop talking about GPL in this context. It has nothing to do with Boron |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [731] | Sorry, Peter was wondering why people in the REBOL community didn't adopt Boron. Aside from REBOL being good enough, licensing was why. I have no reason to not use a *GPL product as a black box - it's looking at the source that can be a problem. |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [732] | You're contradicting yourself |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [733] | Not really. The main way that I learn a programming platform is to view the source, though on platforms where the source is not available (as for proprietary platforms like Delphi) or too complex to be of use (C++ compilers, office suites, most operating systems) then I try to go by the docs and experimentation. If I want to contribute, I need to see the source. However, if I learn anything by looking at the source, I have to be careful about how I apply that knowledge elsewhere if I might violate a license by doing so. So I use Linux, Java, OpenOffice and GCC like they are black boxes with no sources available, only because they are useful enough to be worth using without really learning from them. I wish I could contribute to Boron, but it might interfere with my ability to contribute to REBOL and Red. And I already have a good enough semi-black box in R3. |
Pekr 11-Dec-2011 [734] | ah, I thought boron is GPL. I reacted to MAX's "if it wasn't GPL it might already have supplanted R3 years ago." |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [735] | Yes, this distinction should be continued to be pushed |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [736x2] | What would it take to change the license or Boron from LGPL (which has linking restrictions) to Classpath (which doesn't)? |
Keep in mind that something like encapping is the closest that REBOL has to linking. Is there something like encapping for Boron? | |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [738x3] | Obvious: convince Karl |
Boron is a library, so encapping would be writing your own host for it, so the LGPL library stays separate | |
Quite like R3 | |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [741] | The library is always linked dynamically, as with R3 hostkit apps? |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [742] | I suppose you could link statically, but you don't want that if you don't want to be LGPL compatible. Although you could do it if you distribute your object files for relinking |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [743] | Does Boron have mezzanine code? Is it licensed differently? |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [744] | As far as I know that's also LGPL |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [745] | OK, so I could use Boron as a black box if necessary - good to know :) |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [746] | Right, exactly like REBOL, for your personal goals |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [747] | Like REBOL without the source function or hostkit source, but basically yes. |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [748x2] | The R3 host kit source will taint you more, because it's commercial |
I never saw the REBOL mezzanines be declared PD, either | |
BrianH 11-Dec-2011 [750x2] | Nope, but I wrote most of the R3 mezzanines and all of the recent changes to the R2 ones, and my contributions were either MIT licensed or contributed under the condition that they be open sourced under a permissive license - no copyright transfer agreed to. And the host code is in the open portion of R3 - I haven't seen any closed source. |
I don't have access to the r3lib source either for the same reason. | |
Kaj 11-Dec-2011 [752] | Looking at the R2 mezzanines has already tainted you, and the fact that you can see the source of the R3 host kit doesn't mean that it's open source - it isn't |
PeterWood 11-Dec-2011 [753] | Brian, you could always ask Karl for permission to look at the sources and not have you own worked "tainted" by doing so. Of course, he may say no. On the other hand, there is no harm in asking. |
Gabriele 12-Dec-2011 [754] | Brian, your "see the source" fear is silly. Sure, there's a lot of copyright terror in the USA, but the idea that the authors of Boron would sue you because you wrote similar code elsewere is ridiculous. Also, copyright covers verbatim text, not ideas. You can use what you learn in any way you wish, this is not about patents. |
GiuseppeC 15-Dec-2011 [755] | Hi, I am interested into building an maintaining documentation for those programming languages based on REBOL. It would be nice to have a DOCBASE for them. What I search is: - Someone ABLE to SETUP the Linux and the Wiki Software - Someone which would share with me the cost of hosting. Do you like the idea ? Write me at [giuseppe-:-chillemi-:-eu] |
Endo 16-Dec-2011 [756] | Hi, I can setup mediawiki (or any other) on my web site: http://www.moldibi.com which is up for 7-8 years. Its hosted on hostgator. I have unlimited storage / MySQL DB / bandwidth etc. But I only have 1 domain name. If it is ok I can create any number of subdomains like world.moldibi.com or red.moldibi.com and give you a FTP account if necessary. |
Kaj 26-Dec-2011 [757:last] | I've upgraded Boron on http://tryrebol.esperconsultancy.nlto the latest 0.2.3 |
older | first |