World: r3wp
[#Boron] Open Source REBOL Clone
older newer | first last |
Kaj 16-Jul-2006 [459x2] | I think the best way in REBOL is, as usual, to design dialects on the abstraction level of the user, and implement them in terms of the available C libraries. This is what Orca does so far with Qt and OpenGL |
Apart from cleaner code, it probably makes for better performance as well | |
Anton 16-Jul-2006 [461] | In rebol, it would be faster, yes. Those other compiled languages can more easily afford to map every function. |
Kaj 16-Jul-2006 [462x2] | Yes, I suppose there would be a big difference between compiled and interpreted languages |
My first thought a few years ago was SWIG as well, but after looking into it, I concluded that it was more suitable to some languages than others | |
Joe 16-Jul-2006 [464] | Is anybody planning to take on Orca development ? I wanted to reply to Karl R. message in the Orca mailing list asking him for 1) move license to MIT/BSD 2) what he doesn't like about rebol that prompted him to abandon the project |
Kaj 16-Jul-2006 [465x3] | Karl is continuing with Thune, his other language of his own design. His principle is to design languages based on the same REBOL syntax, but with different semantics. So, Thune is still a lot like REBOL, but not compatible |
Did you read my explanation above why a BSD license wouldn't solve all issues going forward? | |
I am continuing with Orca in Syllable, and I will make improvements to Orca where I can and need them. A few other people have expressed interest in development as well | |
Joe 16-Jul-2006 [468] | No. Would MIT or Boost license be ok ? |
Volker 16-Jul-2006 [469x2] | GPL/LGPL gives a lot libraries, which cant be used with bsd. No bsd or no libraries. |
the other way around works. So lgpl has more power. | |
Anton 19-Jul-2006 [471] | Orca --> OpenRebol : could there be any legal issues using this name ? |
Pekr 19-Jul-2006 [472x2] | then call it Freebol :-) |
not sure, how those things go .... it depends, how RT has registered their trademark .... | |
Volker 19-Jul-2006 [474] | Yarc? |
Anton 19-Jul-2006 [475] | I think there is not a legal problem with "OpenRebol", but I would prefer the opinion of someone like Kaj or Reichart. |
Kaj 19-Jul-2006 [476x2] | I'm not a lawyer, as they say, but I think it's a problem under trademark law. Whether it would be a problem in practice would depend on RT's reaction |
Chances are that RT is obliged to take action, because you loose the right to a name if you don't defend it | |
Anton 19-Jul-2006 [478] | Mmm.. that's an interesting point. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2006 [479] | I finished rewriting the Syllable package manager tool in Orca, from C++. It's going to be in Syllable 0.6.2. I encountered some Orca bugs, but no showstoppers |
Anton 18-Sep-2006 [480] | Have you recorded the bugs ? |
Kaj 18-Sep-2006 [481x2] | I made notes in the program itself |
Are you fixing bugs in Orca? :-) | |
Anton 18-Sep-2006 [483] | Not yet, I'm just wondering if those are being tracked. |
Graham 19-Sep-2006 [484] | Orca has a trac instance |
Kaj 19-Sep-2006 [485] | I'll start doing some things on the project site in the future, but I've got a lot of other stuff going on, so it will take some time until I get to it |
JaimeVargas 19-Sep-2006 [486] | Kaj send me you diffs and I will post the changes. |
Kaj 20-Sep-2006 [487x4] | What diffs? I have to make changes first. :-) When I do, I'll try to do it in the Subversion repository, if that's OK with you |
I entered Orca onto FreshMeat: | |
http://freshmeat.net/projects/rebol-orca/ | |
Unfortunately, they didn't put it on the frontpage | |
JaimeVargas 20-Sep-2006 [491x3] | You can announce to anyone you see fit. It is an open project without direct owners. |
Diffs. I mean load the current base from the repository and generata a universal patch using the diff cmd on the two copies. Then we can check changes one by one. | |
Or I we can wait. | |
Rebolek 20-Oct-2006 [494] | I'm reading Ubuntu 6.06RC release notes and here's this: ORCA Replacing the venerable Gnopernicus is the new Orca, a scriptable screenreader for the GNOME desktop. Expect some great things from this in the coming months and years. Best of all, it is written in Ubuntu's favourite language, Python. Hm, that's not OUR orca :( BTW, what is its current status? |
Kaj 20-Oct-2006 [495x3] | Lots of things are called Orca. We still need a name change |
I'm working with Orca on Syllable. I've identified a number of bugs and missing features that I will work on first when I start developing Orca itself | |
I was pleased to find that none of them are showstoppers, though | |
Kaj 16-Nov-2006 [498x2] | There were a few unreleased bug fixes for Orca and QUIT/RETURN was implemented recently, so I made a new release and put it on FreshMeat: |
http://freshmeat.net/projects/rebol-orca/?branch_id=66431&release_id=241129 | |
Normand 3-Dec-2006 [500] | As Orca is backtracking Rebol why not backtrack the name : lober a lob in tennis is to get the ball over the other player : ). It is free on Freshmeat. |
Kaj 16-Dec-2007 [501x4] | I released new source and binary packages for ORCA: |
http://freshmeat.net/projects/rebol-orca/ | |
There's a binary for Linux, and this new version is also included in Syllable, starting with Syllable Server 0.2 that I just released | |
Several small fixes and enhancements were made to ORCA over the past year, which these packages roll up | |
Kaj 22-Jun-2008 [505x4] | I registered ORCA on Ohloh: |
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/ORCA | |
I also registered my Packager tool for Syllable, written in ORCA: | |
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/Packager | |
older newer | first last |