World: r3wp

I know that you do that - with a gui layout editor.

seems a lot of hardwork though!

reset: func [ value /local type ][
    foreach f face/parent-face/pane [
        if f/type = 'group-box [    
            foreach widget f/pane [    
                type: form widget/type
                switch type [
                    "field" [ show-text widget copy "" ]
                    "area" [show-text widget copy "" ]
                    "edit-list" [ show-text widget copy "" ]

                    "radio-group" [ widget/select-item value]                
                ]
            ]    
        ]
    ]
]

this is a function to reset some of the widgets inside a group-box 
.. doesn't work though

** Script Error: Cannot use path on none! value
** Where: reset
** Near: foreach f face/parent-face/pane [
    if f/type = 'group-box [
        foreach widget f/pane [
            type: form wi...

this function is an action for a button inside the same layout

this code though works if included as is inside the button action 
.. but not when used as a function

radio-group/select-item 0 doesn't work ... doesn't allow you to set 
the radio-group to a state where none is selected

rebgui-edit.r: We have merged it and IIRC Cyphre wanted to sync it. 
But I check the repository.

what's the safest way to allow users to create templates in rebgui 
and not allow them to put executeable code in it?
 http://polly.rebol.it/test/test/game/use/game/unbind.r

(needs testing)

exactly how does it work?

makes an empty context for all known words and binds the loaded block 
to it. including words inside objects and functions.

and could be extended to keep some words bound.

in a way like to-block with hooks.

actually the way it works now, since I have to bind the block to 
my local variables, doesn't that mean I have adequate protection?

Is there a way to control the sort display for a table?

programatically?

yeah

no, not that I know.

so, have to simulate mouse clicks on the table header I guess

Take a look at the source. I think it's a flag and if you than do 
a /redraw it should be sorted.

Ok.

I had a very quick glance at RebGUI widgets. Would it be possible/easier 
to implement LIST-VIEW as a widget?

You're welcome to try ...

Henrik, I suggest first convert your list-view from being based on 
BOX to being based on FACE. Then it's slightly less work to port 
to rebgui.

alrighty then

also, I don't think it's any easier to create a list style using 
VID or REBGUI - the same basic issues are there, but porting to rebgui 
is fairly straightforward. Just keep the rebgui source handy as you 
will need to dip into it a few times.

http://home.wilddsl.net.au/anton/rebol/rebgui/differences-from-VID.txt

Henrik, looking forward to see your first version of the list-view 
widget.

please don't hold your breath :-) I've barely played with the RebGUI 
demo

That's the soft way of community pressure ;-)) I'm quite sure it's 
not that hard to get into RebGUI development.

Is tree-view planned Robert?

It's mostly done (90%) as there is a complete tree in the drop-tree 
widget. We just didn't extract the code into a stand-alone widget 
as I don't need it at the moment. Feel free to go for it.

.

Ashley ...

[me] "is there a reason, that display opens the windows, but does 
not start do-events?" [ashley] ... we can't assume the "first" window 
automatically needs to start the event loop. Perhaps the display 
is being assigned to a word and cached for later use? Or the display 
is done early in the script for lots of subsequent initialization 
and *then* needs to fire up the event loop.

Right, that's it! 


As I see it, there are 3 distinct actions: layout, display, handle 
the events.


With view I can do the layout independently from display and event-handling. 
With rebgui I can't, because display does the layout _and_ display, 
and then I'm stuck with a dysfunctional window. So I can't do a layout 
to assign it to a subpane somewhere, it's instantly displayed as 
it's own window.

Is it possible to get the window size?
 ... display [button do [ws: face/size]]


this always returns 100x100, I guess it is run before the actual 
window size is really computed.

>> display "test" [text "hi" do [s: face/size f: face]]
>> s
== 100x100
>> f/size
== 48x52

display was supposed to return a layout and not display as an refinement. 
 It does not.  But it can be changed to do this.

why do the RebGUI examples quit right away?
Ex:
Rebol []
do %rebgui.r

display/close "Example" [
    text "Closing the window will change its title."
] [show-title face "Closing ..." wait 1]

I have to add a 'halt' in order to see any of the examples but then 
the examples don't work!

gordon, because you need to add do-events at the end

(for some reason I'm unaware of at this time)

Thanks.  I'll give it a try

Yep.  That worked.  Thanks again.

how do you usually aproach encapping your app using RebGUI?

just encap

I know - but if you want to have all in one exe file as a result? 
You have to somehow "include" your code, no? 'do is not enough, is 
it? (as it would expect it being placed in external .r file ...

not understanding ...

tour.r is an example of script that can be encapped

will look in tour.r .... but normally, when I use rebol and encap 
something, if you have "do %rebgui.r", then that file is not being 
encapped, the app expects it it on your hd ...