World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [284] | Anyway, it's very good news to finally get a new sdk - and for command - before Xmas. |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [285] | That of course :) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [286x2] | Ashley can now release a new version of RebGUI as well :) |
Arggg... still using the old beta icon :( | |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [288] | I just wonder, if Command got some fixes. Some openssl vulnerabities appeared in last few years, yet Command showed components of 2002 year. mySQL, from 4.x, requires new authentication method .... I don't trust SDK here ;-) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [289] | ie. the rainbox icon for "R" |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [290] | IIRC ssh is rts own implementation, or do i get that wrong? |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [291] | I don't remember hearing clear statement here. Anyway - for Rebol 3.0, I give rebol the only chance - demodularisation! |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [292] | de?! |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [293x2] | I will try if fast-cgi is fixed for Windows, and if not, then that is the exact reason why I want components ... |
de - well, kind of czech-english here :-) demodularisation - decomposing into modules, or something like that | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [295x2] | I would look for uniserv anyway, if i can run demons and need speed. |
demodularisation - how do you czechs speak? Me german would think de -> opposite of. (Of course its a bit nitpicking for fun ;) | |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [297x2] | :-) |
time to sleep, 0:41 here and I don't believe rebol has already fixed timezone problem, so actually who knows what is the correct time :-) | |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [299] | SDK 2.6.2 released |
Geomol 5-Dec-2005 [300] | It seems, some of the DRAW bugs are solved in the View coming with the new SDK, but rebcode is not included, afaik. |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [301] | and windows now stay infront as supposed to. |
Geomol 5-Dec-2005 [302] | The icons in Canvas looks strange with this new rebview.exe. I wonder why!? |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [303] | hmm... the rebview.exe is 33 kB bigger. that's quite a lot? |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [304] | Perhaps they left the debugging code in by mistake?? |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [305x2] | huh? Did View have Convolve functions for image processing? There is a very fast convolve demo in the desktop now |
under demos | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [307] | Its new. noted in rambo. |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [308] | geomol, something new to add to Canvas :-) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [309] | And just for Pekr .. a button to disable auto-connect on start up! |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [310] | seems the rebol/services guestbook demo is broken now... shouldn't we move to a different group, btw? |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [311] | WHy? isnt the sdk-christmas-tree here? :) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [312x2] | Guestbook works for me. |
Of course, I had a guest book in my rebsite years ago :) | |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [314] | it seems to be a bug in the scroller. if you move it before the guestbook is loaded, it craps out |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [315x2] | Ahh... see it too now. |
not asynchronous | |
Geomol 6-Dec-2005 [317x2] | I found out, why the icons in Canvas look different with the new rebview.exe coming with the new SDK. Before the SCALE command in DRAW didn't influence LINE-WIDTH, it does now. |
I also see differences in the pixel-precision, when using DRAW. It seems, Cyphre's changes to DRAW are included in this release. | |
Gabriele 6-Dec-2005 [319] | yes, line-width scales now. |
Pekr 6-Dec-2005 [320x6] | Henrik - IIRC Cyphre did convolve as an Rebcode test - but as rebcode is not inside, I expect currently convolve is in-built ... |
it is imo way faster than even rebcode ... pity rebcode is not c level speed :-) | |
and as for strange colors, Geomol, I thought I have modified my monitor settings, but I do remember bubbles in demo were of slightly different colors | |
was there any tweaking to color schemes or such? | |
it seems more dark or so .. | |
hmm, the same, sorry, different quality LCDs here ... | |
Rebolek 6-Dec-2005 [326] | If you look at source, you can see that 'convolve effect has been really added. Nice. I can't wait for change-log for 1.3.2 |
Henrik 6-Dec-2005 [327] | pekr, I saw the rebcode test, and yes, the version in 1.3.2 is extremely fast compared to that one... |
Pekr 6-Dec-2005 [328] | well, it is C against rebcode ... |
Henrik 6-Dec-2005 [329] | makes you think a bit. :-) still, I did a gauss blur convolve in plain rebol code vs. rebcode and the rebol version would have taken a full minute to process the image, so rebcode is much better than nothing :-) |
Cyphre 9-Dec-2005 [330x3] | Guys, please be patient ;) I'll post DRAW change summary in AGG group very soon. |
BTW the new convolve function is written directly in C. Carl liked the rebcode convolution demo so he decided we should add this effect at native level. | |
From my quick tests the C version of convolve is about 15-25 times fater than the rebcode version. But this doesn't mean that rebcode is always 20time slower. It depends on the application imo. | |
Pekr 9-Dec-2005 [333] | yes, I noticed it, as I played with original rebcode versin a bit .... I thought for a little while - cool, they speed up rebcode, maybe kind of compiler inside? :-) and then I realised I am running official release, without rebcode inside :-) |
older newer | first last |