r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[SDK]

amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1498]
I originaly just had teh pic displayed in a layout with "image pic"

I later put in a 'box with specified size (matching the resolution 
of image)
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1499]
that is what image style is  ;-)
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1500x2]
It appears to be just that machine but I tried it on an other machine 
with same hardware with no prob
oh
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1502]
did you try different images?
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1503x3]
The image was creaed from a layout (to-image)
created
But the layout also contains a jpg
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1506]
and you are sure the image itself doesn't have the artefact?  (llooking 
into picture viewer, for eample)
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1507x2]
I can't play with different images now as the offending computer 
is at work...I'll play with it tomorrow night..
Just wanted to see if it was a common problem..

Thanks
jpeg looks clean and displays proper everywhere else
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1509x2]
there is a strange bug in view where face with edges need a color 
to be specified.  if color is none I've seen screwy thing happen 
with the edges.
but this just happens in some parent/child face nesting circumstance 
which I don't recall.
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1511]
I'll try some other pics tomorrow night...its got to be something 
with the jpeg..
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1512]
try making sure each face has a color, if you see the problem again, 
with another image.
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1513]
Why only that computer and only when encapped is my question..


The work computer is FDNY property and locked down somewhat so its 
hard to debug if its the computer's issue...
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[1514]
to me its the "only when encapped" part which is the strangest!
Graham
13-Dec-2009
[1515]
Especially if the image is part of the binary
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1516]
it is
Gregg
13-Dec-2009
[1517]
Is the offending system set to use large fonts, or does it have a 
funky video setting (different DPI) that might be the culprit?
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1518]
The screen does look off (aspect and resolution wise) but I can't 
check as the display properties access seems to be locked down for 
security...
Gregg
13-Dec-2009
[1519]
In my old VB days, large fonts was a major bugbear.
amacleod
13-Dec-2009
[1520]
That may also be the problem...some of the officers have bad eyes 
and may have increased font size..I'll check it out. Thanks for the 
hints Gregg.
amacleod
15-Dec-2009
[1521]
New element to the puzzle....


I got it to work on the offending machine but only if the app is 
NOT located on the desktop. When placed in its own folder under c: 
it works fine.
Maxim
15-Dec-2009
[1522]
that is totally weird!
amacleod
15-Dec-2009
[1523x2]
There might be some unusual disokay properties set but I do not have 
access to them it seems...
display = disokay
Maxim
15-Dec-2009
[1525]
the only problem I've ever had with apps on the desktop is with the 
spaces in the file path.
Graham
15-Dec-2009
[1526]
I check for desktop and warn users that the app might not run correctly.
amacleod
15-Dec-2009
[1527]
Graham, you have had issues running from desktop?  or is that your 
advice?
Graham
15-Dec-2009
[1528]
Yes, issues running from desktop ... so don't advise it .. and I 
specifically check for desktop installation and alert user not to 
do this ...
amacleod
15-Dec-2009
[1529]
Is this a bug in rebol encap? Or do other platforms have this same 
issue?
BenBran
6-Jan-2010
[1530]
Not sure where to put this so asking here:


I downloaded a web script and it has a  snippet I don't understand:
buffer: make string! 1024         ;; contains the browser request
file: "index.html"
parse buffer ["get" ["http"  |   "/ "  |  copy file to " " ]]

what does:

copy file to " "

mean or do?
tia
Graham
6-Jan-2010
[1531x4]
copies everything after the http till it reaches a space to a variable 
named file
or after the "/" if there is no http
eh ... no that either
everything after get that is not / or http ...
BrianH
6-Jan-2010
[1535]
Moved the question to Parse.
Graham
6-Jan-2010
[1536]
[ copy question to end ( append parse-channel question)  ]
amacleod
28-Jan-2010
[1537]
From the new products page:

REBOL Technologies has changed its product catalog. REBOL/Command 
features are now part of REBOL/SDK. We've eliminated the standard 
REBOL/SDK. We also will be lowering our pricing for these products 
accordingly. 


How does this affect current sdk owners? Can we download command 
sdk and use with our key?
Graham
28-Jan-2010
[1538]
well, the corrollary of that is .. do existing sdk/command users 
get a refund ...
DideC
1-Feb-2010
[1539]
Well, generally when you buy a TV 1000$ and the price get to down 
to 800$ 2 month later, the shop does not refund the difference. So 
why RT whould ?
Or maybe just those who buy this month (if there is some) !
Graham
1-Feb-2010
[1540x3]
That was my point ...
But there are some stores that do!
And they're the ones who have loyal customers forever :)
DideC
11-Feb-2010
[1543]
Yes but only if you bought the TV a short time before tre price goes 
down. Not years.
Graham
24-Feb-2010
[1544]
Is this longest period we have not had a SDK follow a new release?
BrianH
1-Mar-2010
[1545]
New 2.7.7 SDK release: http://www.rebol.com/sdk.html
Pekr
2-Mar-2010
[1546]
where's the download link?
Claude
2-Mar-2010
[1547]
i think you must ask for it !!!!