World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
older newer | first last |
Pekr 2-Nov-2005 [928x2] | now how I am supposed to prove our new customers how much data they downloaded and when and show them logs :-) |
I have to think about it for a while ..... | |
JaimeVargas 2-Nov-2005 [930] | MRTG. Don't reinvent the wheel. |
Pekr 2-Nov-2005 [931x4] | I will have to find a way of how to study it - it is very late here and I just looked into archive size - 1.6 MB archive - oh my ... so - if there is no simple way of how to wrap it, I will go my own way, as usual, even with limited featureset - I don't need fancy javascript/java/whatever graphing - if I go View way, I will have to develop AGG based graphing anyway ... |
If it is dependant upon perl etc. myriad of install steps, forget it ... | |
the only way I will accept it is - 1) someone introduces me quickly into how to use it, wrap it 2) it comes preinstalled on linux similar way, of how I can use webmail for e.g. I will not go thru all this - http://www.mrtg.cz/mrtg-nw-guide.html | |
Advantage of mikrotik is, that I don't have necessarily to depend upon snmp - It has good router scripting, and I can prepare my own format (even rebol blocks ;-) of output ... and some folks do so with the router scripting language available .... | |
Pekr 3-Nov-2005 [935x2] | hmm, will have to study a mrtg a bit ... not sure how fast I would get to at least few percent functionality .... look at Cacti for e.g. http://www.cacti.net |
based on rrdtool - that is the next pointer of where I could start to look ... | |
JaimeVargas 3-Nov-2005 [937] | rrdtool is pretty easy to use. But some people say MRTG is easier. I prefer rrdtool. |
Micha 19-Nov-2005 [938] | I have account cpanel in www.qwerty.vaio-hosting.com how to instal rebol ? |
Volker 19-Nov-2005 [939x3] | ;copy exe somewhere, make it executable, write a cgi: #!/where/is/rebol -cs rebol[] print "content-type: text/plain^/^/" print "Hello cgi" |
typicla problems: line-endings with windows->linux. upload as acsii. forgetting to make something executable, both exe and cgi must be. (its linux/apache) | |
(if it is linux/apache) | |
Micha 19-Nov-2005 [942] | you can me install ? |
Volker 19-Nov-2005 [943] | with password i guess yes |
Micha 19-Nov-2005 [944] | I sended you on pw |
Volker 25-Nov-2005 [945] | How can i get rid of the border around a link-image? http://polly.rebol.it/test/test/index.html |
Rebolek 25-Nov-2005 [946] | border="0" |
Volker 25-Nov-2005 [947] | thanks |
Micha 30-Nov-2005 [948] | how to install rebol view in cpanel ? |
Pekr 3-Dec-2005 [949] | what tag do you use for templates? Is it comment tag? I can see e.g. <!--[snih_tabulka_zacatek]--> and some other <% ......> I would like to know (dis)advantages of both. Thanks a lot |
Izkata 4-Dec-2005 [950] | I used to know how to do this... but can't remember it anymore - how do I perform a POST to a webpage? Wasn't it something like read/custom http://www.Whatever.com [Post {This=That}] |
Graham 4-Dec-2005 [951] | looks correct |
Izkata 4-Dec-2005 [952x3] | Hmm.. for <form name="def" id="def" action=planet.cgi?1213&adr method=POST autocomplete=off>, the server doesn't seem to like read/custom http://www.territories3069.com/3.x/planet.cgi?1213&adr[POST {ddr=1212}] It gives a 405 error (Method not allowed) |
All the arguments are there (I checked with a reb-proxy, the page itself is very ugly) | |
I tried making a low-level version (with TCP), but the data it wants is inside Port/state/inBuffer, when sent in the browser.. and simply setting it in the Port doesn't seem to work | |
Tomc 4-Dec-2005 [955] | I think I make post a string or literal i.e [ 'POST |
Izkata 4-Dec-2005 [956x5] | Wierd - Literal seems to work |
Well, it didn't error... | |
... but it doesn't seem to have worked correctly here. But it's a step in the right direction, at least | |
It worked! | |
Not sure which permutation of the code did it, but it did work... Thanks! | |
Graham 4-Dec-2005 [961] | since it's a dialect it should be [ post ... ] but if you need to evaluate the contents of the block, it should be reduce [ 'post post-contents ] |
Sunanda 2-Feb-2006 [962] | Good news / bad news The good news is that MS are beta-ing Internet Explorer 7, so it's a good chance to see how well your website may look in that browser (like it or not it is liekly to become a dominent browser) http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie7/default.mspx The bad news is two-fold: they have fixed most of the well-known CSS hacks; if you use the hacks your site may not render properly in IE7. Second, it is not easy to install IE7 alongside any existing IE version -- it's a reversible upgrade (in theory), so you might want to try it on a spare partition/machine. Windows only at this stage, of course. |
Graham 2-Feb-2006 [963x2] | I"m having lots of crashes in FF .. so I'll likely give it a go. |
It may be that FF's main contribution is to force MS to upgrade IE ! | |
Pekr 2-Feb-2006 [965] | crashes with FF? :-) I run Mozilla each day, heavily with tons of tabs, windows, jumping here or there, never seen a crash for past year or two ... I would not expect FF being worse in that regard? |
Graham 2-Feb-2006 [966] | Yeah .. get couple of crashes per day. |
Anton 2-Feb-2006 [967x2] | Could be latest update, I got a crash today. Shortly afterwards a notification of a new bufix release. |
bugfix | |
Ashley 2-Feb-2006 [969] | Does FF handle ASP pages? Out of the box, or is a plugin required? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2006 [970] | ASP pages? They're generated on server, aren't they? |
Anton 2-Feb-2006 [971] | yeah, server-side aren't they Active Server Pages ? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2006 [972] | so the result is normal HTML |
Sunanda 2-Feb-2006 [973] | Incidently, it is (despite what MS says) possible to install multiple versions of IE....It just isn't always easy. http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone |
Ashley 2-Feb-2006 [974] | My online bank account uses ASP to generate monthly statements, which works fine from Opera, IE and Safari - but fails under FF with a "Could not open xyz.asp"; so I figured it had a problem with ASP pages in general. |
Graham 2-Feb-2006 [975] | I use a number of sites which don't work in FF. Annoying.. but ASP .. not seen that one as opposed to a site problem. |
Anton 2-Feb-2006 [976x2] | Are you sure that's not just a transient problem ? |
(I suppose you switched to try another browser straight away.) | |
older newer | first last |