World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
| older newer | first last |
| ScottT 27-Apr-2005 [648x5] | Net is going to need restricted, I think, and cache probably needs some restriction as well. I wonder if there's been any discussions on how to keep rebol from being the target for some very malicious code. I know more about IE's security model and what I can do at IE defaults, and would like to code such that I am not relying on features that can/should/will be restricted by default. |
I think it is a matter of "Safe for Scripting" which would need to be a safer subset of the full view. | |
I guess I should build a .r that is restricted to this safe subset. I think I basically want to accomplish a web page that is obfuscated peer to peer instant messaging. I see rim as an example. Is there anything about rim that could not be accomplished within a safe-for-scripting subset? | |
--no events-- ,LaunchURL = // PUT String ,bgcolor = // PUT String ,ScriptVersion = // PUT String ,args = // PUT String ,LaunchURL;// GET String ,bgcolor;// GET String ,ScriptVersion;// GET String ,args;// GET String | |
I know about evaluate for doing DOM stuff from the .r script, but what about the other way around? | |
| Geomol 27-May-2005 [653] | Does anyone have experience with NetApp NetCache proxies? http://www.netapp.com/products/netcache/ My REBOL solution calling services over HTTPS works ok with the Squid proxy, but not with NetCache. Any ideas? |
| Allen 27-May-2005 [654] | This may be the problem. http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3532& |
| Geomol 16-Jun-2005 [655] | It seems, a call to net-log failed, and that was the cause of the problem. It's because NetCache has extra header-lines, that e.g. Squid doesn't have. See RAMBO 3638. |
| Anton 17-Jun-2005 [656] | Anyone know a list of web anonymisers that I can try ? All the ones I've tried have failed to connect from here in Australia. |
| Graham 17-Jun-2005 [657x2] | tomc was writing one at one stage? |
to try the current version, set your browsers http proxy to Proxy: bionix.cs.uoregon.edu Port: 3776 untested | |
| Tomc 17-Jun-2005 [659x4] | that was not an anominizer but a cgi debugging aid |
an echo proxy .... 3776 is "EC0" in hex | |
it is only up intermittantly | |
for http proxy lists ...http://www.samair.ru/proxy/ | |
| Graham 17-Jun-2005 [663] | my mistake. That samair site seems unaccessible to me. |
| Tomc 18-Jun-2005 [664x2] | working fine from here |
page: read http://www.samair.ru/proxy/proxy-20.htm == {<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> | |
| Graham 18-Jun-2005 [666] | works for me too now |
| Tomc 18-Jun-2005 [667] | pages go from 01 thru 20 |
| Anton 19-Jun-2005 [668] | Thanks guys. :) |
| Graham 20-Jun-2005 [669x5] | http://www.compkarori.com/smtp/index.html A utility to check for valid email ...in beta test. |
Now this is interesting ... Email: [holger-:-rebol-:-com] Smtp-challenge loaded .. domain: rebol.com 220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:19:13 -0700 HELO compkarori.com 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. 250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25] Mail from: 250 OK RCPT TO: 550-"The recipient cannot be verified. Please check all recipients of this in state 3: 550-"The recipient cannot be verified. Please check all recipients of this user not found | |
Email: [gregg-:-rebol-:-com] Smtp-challenge loaded .. domain: rebol.com 220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:19:37 -0700 HELO compkarori.com 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. 250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25] Mail from: 250 OK RCPT TO: 250 Accepted in state 3: 250 Accepted ok - user is here! | |
Email: [gabriele-:-rebol-:-com] Smtp-challenge loaded .. domain: rebol.com 220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:20:01 -0700 HELO compkarori.com 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. 250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25] Mail from: 250 OK RCPT TO: 250 Accepted in state 3: 250 Accepted ok - user is here! | |
Staff changes at RT ? | |
| Ladislav 21-Jun-2005 [674] | :-) |
| Ammon 21-Jun-2005 [675] | I thought that was public knowledge... |
| Gabriele 21-Jun-2005 [676] | you forgot to check [cyphre-:-rebol-:-com] :-) |
| Graham 21-Jun-2005 [677] | I did check it :) |
| Pekr 21-Jun-2005 [678] | I really don't understand, why there is still Holger? Is he still around? |
| Graham 21-Jun-2005 [679x2] | You misunderstand ... that was to show the script working |
See how the mail server rejects the mail address for Holger | |
| yeksoon 21-Jun-2005 [681] | For those on Firefox, a RIX search plugin here: http://neusteps.com/sw/rix.zip 1. Unzip 2. Move rix.src, rix.png to firefox searchplugin folder 3. Close and launch browser. |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [682x2] | Is there any easy way to create an app using a View front-end, but manipulate data on a webserver backend? Would a normal method be to write the View frontend, then use cgi for the backend? |
I was thinking of writing a webapp, but I'd rather have View handle the GUI lifting. | |
| Graham 24-Jun-2005 [684x3] | Yes, no |
I use View for the frontend, and use rugby for the encrypted comms. | |
rugby offers advantages over cgi. | |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [687] | So Rugby runs as a server on its own port and I'd have to poke a hole in my firewall? |
| Graham 24-Jun-2005 [688] | yes |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [689] | Damn--Rugby is cool. |
| Graham 24-Jun-2005 [690] | Rugby has an async mode so you could emulate this Ajax concept if you wished as well. |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [691] | Rebol kills me. The deeper you look, the more you find. You wonder why more people aren't aware of it. After playing with Rugby a bit, I don't think I'll write another personal cgi app again. |
| Graham 24-Jun-2005 [692x2] | Note also that rugby runs as a daemon so you would usually have to run your own web server. |
I guess Rebol/LNS would replace Rugby in the future if it ever gets released. | |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [694] | I'm already running a webserver, so it's no big deal. If the connections are encrypted, I don't mind having the extra port open. |
| Graham 24-Jun-2005 [695] | http://www.compkarori.com/portal/ is one application I'm running. |
| MikeJ 24-Jun-2005 [696x2] | Nice. Simple, small download, response, etc. |
response == responsive | |
| older newer | first last |