r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Web] Everything web development related

Graham
1-Apr-2005
[633]
I think Jaime wants to know how to get the data first !
Luisc
1-Apr-2005
[634]
OOps.. Ok  sorry  jaime =(
ScottT
26-Apr-2005
[635x2]
OK.  what's the secret to getting plugin working in IE 6?  I've read 
how IE supposedly doesn't like embed tags, but that isn't true insofar 
as I've been using embed only for SWF files.  Same with SVG.
When I try the samples.  they all fire off the download, etc.  install 
seems to work, except that I always end up with red x, and nothing 
ever runs.  Just wondered whether anyone ever figured out what was 
up with that, or whether there was any momentum at all with rebol 
plug-in.  I'd probably rather have an active-x/progid sort of affair, 
but talk about a can of worms.  I've never done it, but looked into 
it.  seems like it may not be such a big step, though, if there's 
been success with browser plugin.  This is all sort of an aside. 
 I didn't really have anything particular in mind, except as maybe 
an Ajax alternative.
Graham
26-Apr-2005
[637]
There isn't normally a problem with IE6.
ScottT
26-Apr-2005
[638]
you're right.  worked first time today.  I had encountered it again 
through someone else's site, but when I went through rebol.com, it 
worked fine.  very good.
Graham
26-Apr-2005
[639]
it could have been pointing to an old binary
Gregg
26-Apr-2005
[640]
I'm not expecting any new plug-in releases until LNS is out and other 
builds are done. Don't know about momentum, but I'm using it for 
a project and it's pretty darn handy if you ask me.
ScottT
26-Apr-2005
[641x2]
I've been in awe of it since I got it working.  IE has been my primary 
platform for a long time now.  Spent quite a bit of time building 
a working asynchronous http client with IE's xmlhttp, but now am 
wondering why I bothered.  Rebol makes me nervous and excited about 
the implications.
In IE there are cross-domain issues.  Does this plugin adhere to 
these settings?
Volker
26-Apr-2005
[643]
I think not, it does its own networking like rebview.
ScottT
27-Apr-2005
[644]
that is fantastic.  I'm starting to shake a little.  beyond all expectations. 
 talk about power to the people. . .  I'm off to do some crazy prototype. 
 I'll post a link when I get something wild cooking.
Anton
27-Apr-2005
[645]
It's not stable, so you will come across some weird crashing bugs. 
Also, only one instance of rebol plugin per browser is possible.
Henrik
27-Apr-2005
[646]
security features are not enabled either as far as I know, but it 
has great potential, yes
Volker
27-Apr-2005
[647]
try [probe secure query]. you can only access the rebol cache-directory 
IIRC. but net is not restricted.
ScottT
27-Apr-2005
[648x5]
Net is going to need restricted, I think, and cache probably needs 
some restriction as well.  I wonder if there's been any discussions 
on how to keep rebol from being the target for some very malicious 
code.  I know more about IE's security model and what I can do at 
IE defaults, and would like to code such that I am not relying on 
features that can/should/will be restricted by default.
I think it is a matter of "Safe for Scripting" which would need to 
be a safer subset of the full view.
I guess I should build a .r that is restricted to this safe subset. 
 I think I basically want to accomplish a web page that is obfuscated 
peer to peer instant messaging.  I see rim as an example.  Is there 
anything about rim that could not be accomplished within a safe-for-scripting 
subset?
--no events-- 
,LaunchURL =    // PUT String 
,bgcolor =    // PUT String 
,ScriptVersion =    // PUT String 
,args =    // PUT String 
,LaunchURL;// GET String 
,bgcolor;// GET String 
,ScriptVersion;// GET String 
,args;// GET String
I know about evaluate for doing DOM stuff from the .r script, but 
what about the other way around?
Geomol
27-May-2005
[653]
Does anyone have experience with NetApp NetCache proxies? http://www.netapp.com/products/netcache/

My REBOL solution calling services over HTTPS works ok with the Squid 
proxy, but not with NetCache. Any ideas?
Allen
27-May-2005
[654]
This may be the problem. http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3532&
Geomol
16-Jun-2005
[655]
It seems, a call to net-log failed, and that was the cause of the 
problem. It's because NetCache has extra header-lines, that e.g. 
Squid doesn't have. See RAMBO 3638.
Anton
17-Jun-2005
[656]
Anyone know a list of web anonymisers that I can try ? All the ones 
I've tried have failed to connect from here in Australia.
Graham
17-Jun-2005
[657x2]
tomc was writing one at one stage?
to try the current version, set your browsers http proxy to

Proxy: bionix.cs.uoregon.edu
Port:  3776

untested
Tomc
17-Jun-2005
[659x4]
that was not an anominizer but a cgi debugging aid
an echo proxy   .... 3776 is "EC0" in hex
it is only up intermittantly
for http proxy lists ...http://www.samair.ru/proxy/
Graham
17-Jun-2005
[663]
my mistake.  That samair site seems unaccessible to me.
Tomc
18-Jun-2005
[664x2]
working fine from here
page: read http://www.samair.ru/proxy/proxy-20.htm

== {<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Graham
18-Jun-2005
[666]
works for me too now
Tomc
18-Jun-2005
[667]
pages go from 01 thru 20
Anton
19-Jun-2005
[668]
Thanks guys. :)
Graham
20-Jun-2005
[669x5]
http://www.compkarori.com/smtp/index.html

A utility to check for valid email ...in beta test.
Now this is interesting ...

Email: [holger-:-rebol-:-com]

Smtp-challenge loaded ..
domain:  rebol.com

220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:19:13 
-0700 
HELO compkarori.com

220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 
220 and/or bulk e-mail.

250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25]
Mail from:
250 OK
RCPT TO:

550-"The recipient cannot be verified.  Please check all recipients 
of this

in state 3:  550-"The recipient cannot be verified.  Please check 
all recipients of this
user not found
Email: [gregg-:-rebol-:-com]

Smtp-challenge loaded ..
domain:  rebol.com

220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:19:37 
-0700 
HELO compkarori.com

220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 
220 and/or bulk e-mail.

250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25]
Mail from:
250 OK
RCPT TO:
250 Accepted
in state 3:  250 Accepted
ok - user is here!
Email: [gabriele-:-rebol-:-com]

Smtp-challenge loaded ..
domain:  rebol.com

220-gs5.inmotionhosting.com ESMTP Exim 4.42 #1 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:20:01 
-0700 
HELO compkarori.com

220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 
220 and/or bulk e-mail.

250 gs5.inmotionhosting.com Hello compka at compkarori.com [216.166.83.25]
Mail from:
250 OK
RCPT TO:
250 Accepted
in state 3:  250 Accepted
ok - user is here!
Staff changes at RT ?
Ladislav
21-Jun-2005
[674]
:-)
Ammon
21-Jun-2005
[675]
I thought that was public knowledge...
Gabriele
21-Jun-2005
[676]
you forgot to check [cyphre-:-rebol-:-com] :-)
Graham
21-Jun-2005
[677]
I did check it :)
Pekr
21-Jun-2005
[678]
I really don't understand, why there is still Holger? Is he still 
around?
Graham
21-Jun-2005
[679x2]
You misunderstand ... that was to show the script working
See how the mail server rejects the mail address for Holger
yeksoon
21-Jun-2005
[681]
For those on Firefox,

a RIX search plugin here:
http://neusteps.com/sw/rix.zip

1. Unzip
2. Move rix.src, rix.png to firefox searchplugin folder
3. Close and launch browser.
MikeJ
24-Jun-2005
[682]
Is there any easy way to create an app using a View front-end, but 
manipulate data on a webserver backend?  Would a normal method be 
to write the View frontend, then use cgi for the backend?