World: r3wp

I recently used Kompozer to build a quick site to fix a friend's 
site that was so bad I figured I could at least spend a few hours 
and take it from a 1 to a 6 (scale one to ten).

There are a few variations of Kompozer.  But Kompozer is the best 
of them.


It still sucks though.  When you do view source it does not put your 
cursor where you expect it to.  It is nightmarish to figure out how 
to edit tables. 
But, over all, if you keep things simple, it works well enough.

mobile browsing expected to outpace desktop access in 3-5 years.

Most of the world lives on their cell phones.


As to JavaScript Frameworks to fix the biggest human fail in computer 
history (that being that we use HTML+JavaScript to build UserInterface), 
having headed the creation of a complete UI system that is delivered 
through the web, I will say the following:


- Find something that handles Tables (grids, lists) well.  Make sure 
it does verything you need.

- Make a list for yourself of widgets you care about, and confirm 
(assume nothing) about the level of detail with which they operate. 
 For example, Imagine 3 radio buttons, on the web they have no default 
state, and some interfaces allow them to operate like checkboxes, 
not radio buttons.  Again, assume nothing!

- Confirm, for yourself, they work on the platforms you care about. 
 Nothing works on everything, even when they claim it.


I did not want to build Quilt, but we still don't know anything that 
comes close other than Tibco's crap, and I'm not sure they even sell 
it anymore. (I recall it was like $100K).

I must correct myself.. I don't want to write my own JS stuff anymore... 
I just found that one old script (simple menu running on the site 
many years) stopped working in IE8. I don't want to deal with browser's 
(un)compatibilities anymore.. better to use an obscure framework 
or don't use JS at all.

a good resource I found to start using HTML 5 and help make those 
pages work somewhat backwards compatible on non html5 browsers.

http://diveintohtml5.org/

I haven't finished reading, but so far I like it.   I like the writing 
style.

it has a nice retrospect of HTML and tackles a single question... 
"why do we have an <IMG> tag in html?"... the answer is surprisingly 
simple and evocative:
The ones that win are the ones that ship.

funny... the leading OS is called WINdows   ;-)

about JS libs:

I don't use jQuery .. it's oweblown for what I want (I don't need 
it to reinvent javascript). If I need any complex components like 
datepicker (which I don't want to reinvent) I use mootools usually 
(because you can use just needed parts of it). jQuery UI modules 
(which has this) are very very slow and CSS is so complex I don't 
even start to get it how to customize it.


Dojo always seemed this mega lib that I don't want either. If I go 
to their demos (at least last time I looked) everything is slow and 
unresponsive. I want my things to be slim on code and snappy.


Prototype (mootools does this also, but I think a little less) is 
first generation JS lib (that started it all). I think it heavily 
monkey patches the core JS/DOM objects.. thats why I don't like it.


I also neve use css3 selectors in my JS code (that is a major part 
why people use jquery and likes). I always move relative to an element 
with seekFwd, seekIn, seekOut, seekBack fuctions I have or just use 
ID of element (and then seek if needed).

UsrJoy and InvoiceFox generate 90% of html on client side. I have 
few weird (functional-ish (as in functional programming)) ideas how 
to do this: I use http://code.google.com/p/jsgoo/http://refaktor.si/demos/jsgoo/
 for this

Janko: we tried http://angularjs.orgrecently. it also does client 
side html templating BUT in 2 ways. the merged data can update itself 
inside the template and also if some input fields change, the corresponding 
model variables reflect this change automatically.

the best framework i've seen so far & u can mix it easily with jquery 
or mootools

jQuery is imo typical example of another so called standard the world 
has choosen, and yet again the wrong one :-) Even MS suggests it 
to use with SharePoint ....

The ones that win are the ones that ship.
   ;-)

Maxim - then I don't support those that win, nor am I interested 
to win :-) I thought that' why we are here in the first place :-) 
Or we could all be using php, Ruby, or any new trend which appears 
:-)

Janko - what do you think about -  http://gwt-ext.com/?

Pekr: what else then if not jquery?

onetom, do you have a site using this angularisjs ?

http://misko.hevery.com/2010/07/29/a-radically-different-way-of-building-ajax-apps/

here is a video about angular. it's one hour but it worth very much 
to watch.

and yes, i have a site using angular, but it's a work in progress, 
so i can't show it publicly. privmsg me if u r interested

So, angular is a DSL that is compiled into JS client side to handle 
all the dom manipulation and other stuff that you would normally 
have to write JS to do ...or use Jquery functions.

Sounds like a neat idea .. less is better !

angular is a js library which interprets special tags, attributes 
and element values in the dom and sets up an event handler system 
behind the scenes which keeps model objects in sync w the dom content 
(back and forth)

wow, the new FF really is annoying  :-)


what is it with browser makers... they just keep making their stuff 
more and more aggravating to use.

ah, I just put back some toolbars which are off by default... making 
a bit more sense.

u seem to be a prisoner of your habits. toolbars? in a browser? what 
is the good for? :)

finally i dont have to start with turning off the bookmarks bar on 
a fresh install. most ppl dont use it anyway... and probably FF maker 
have *measuered* this. and giving more space for the content worth 
more than bookmarking

don't get me wrong, I like that FF is conscious about screen real 
estate.... its just that opening a window with no buttons, is a bit 
drastic.  I hate pulldown menus because they are extremely slow.

so why not use keyboard shortcuts?

bah, I've learnt so many keyboard shortcuts in my life (with a past 
in vfx and innumerable 3d & fx softwares ;-) that my memory for such 
things is pretty full.

yeah, I know what you mean, but a browser is such a constantly used 
tool that a few shortcuts are worth memorizing, IMO

http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/
this seems to be some serious shit...

the guy who is writing the angular.js framework can run 300 unit 
tests in 400ms on the 10K lines code base.

I have a question regarding fonts on web-sites: Take a look at this 
one here: http://www.binaryage.com/


It uses a font called PLAY which I like a lot. This font wasn't installed 
on my system, but the web-site displayed it. It's even not one of 
the standard web fonts I know. Why does this work?

I did just quick look at the site and it seems it uses this service 
http://fontdeck.com

Seems to work via Google as well: http://www.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Play&subset=latin#code

yes, the google api is probably using the fontdeck site internaly.

Also such fonts will work properly only in newer browsers..the binariage 
site looks terribly in IE8 for example.

IE9 looks the same as Safari, no problems.

I just noted that so you know. It depends how much you care about 
the backward compatibility etc.

Yep... thx. It should work for most people of course.

The Googel Webfonts home page drives my Firefox 3.5 into a crash 
loop

im wondering what is the best way of providing permalinks for mechanical 
parts, like pipe fittings.
i'd like to provide a catalog of them for a couple of companies.

each company has their own part number system which unambigously 
identifies a product. i would expose a description page about these 
as:
/company/part-number

it would however look cryptic and wouldn't empasize what is that 
page about, so we were thinking about attaching a slug to it, to 
help human usage and search engines too.

Q1: im not very sure about how much more effective from a SEO point 
of view to have a slug in the URL as opposed to keywords in meta 
tags and the same description as in the title of the page for example.

Q2: would it be okay to add the slug as an extra  path level, like 
stackoverflow.com does?

Search engines don't use meta keywords anymore

Q3: do u know any article describing best practices regarding permalinks/slugs?

A structured description in a title tag would be OK, but it seems 
that URLs help extra

I use a unique identifier such as a date, followed by a textual description 
in the rest of the URL

it's not a news site, so there might be issues with the unqueness 
of the slug and other things like, i might need to display the nominal 
size of the part which is a fraction in many cases, lile 1-1/4" which 
wouldnt read nice at all if i have to replace the slash. the dbl 
quote might be okay to omit though

Yes, readability is a problem, so URLs are often more optimised for 
search engines than for human readers

1/4" would be 0.25-inch

No, it;s two hoon in this part of the world.

http://typekit.com/