World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
| older newer | first last |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1707x2] | I'm creating a forum and using R3 CGI to output a page. How do we send the Doctype to page? |
Or rather how do we generate the DTD on output of the CGI | |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1709] | Simple PRINT the doctype before the HTML, eg print <!doctype html> print <html lang="en"> print <head> etc |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1710] | Yeah, I tried that. Maybe I did something wrong. I'm going to try that again. |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1711] | If you look at the source of www.rebol.com you can see it done as simply as possible. |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1712x4] | Alright I had done this before but it must be something broke with the div centering. |
finally I got it to work!!! | |
IE8 required the DTD spec in order make the div center. | |
looks good on Chrome also. | |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1716] | Yeah, IE has different ideas on when to go to quirks mode. |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1717x2] | Yeah I couuldn't figure out why I couldn't get the main container div to center on IE8. Kept messing with it and then read where you had to declare the DTD for it to center. |
I was going crazy because Chrome was centering it just fine. | |
| Ashley 2-Apr-2010 [1719] | Code snippet to "inline" an image:
string: trim/lines form read/binary file
remove back tail string
ajoin [{<img src="data:image/} next suffix? file ";base64," skip
string 5 {">}]
Adds about 30-50% to image size but reduces server fetches (important
for wireless access).
|
| Maxim 2-Apr-2010 [1720] | COOL! I didn't know we could do this. |
| Gabriele 3-Apr-2010 [1721] | use ENBASE instead of trim/lines form etc. |
| Ashley 3-Apr-2010 [1722] | Ah, even simpler then:
ajoin [{<img src="data:image/} next suffix? file ";base64," enbase
read/binary file {">}]
Thanx.
|
| Will 3-Apr-2010 [1723x2] | remember to take care of client caching issues 8-) |
and obviously you can have all the image data in a javascript file as well (for which you probably already have a longer cache expire set up) | |
| Chris 3-Apr-2010 [1725] | I think the only downside of a data: url is it's not supported in IE, iirc. |
| Paul 1-May-2010 [1726] | Anyone else use Concrete5 CMS? Pretty good stuff. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1727x2] | Is there anyway to delete wiki spam off rebol.net? If you just revert the page, the spam is still accessible to search engines and still gets indexed so the spammer still gets what they want. |
ie. it remains in the revision history | |
| Andreas 11-May-2010 [1729x2] | the history pages are not supposed to be indexed |
and they have `<meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" />` in their head to that effect, so simply reverting the change should be fine | |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1731] | Except they are being read by my crawler .. |
| Andreas 11-May-2010 [1732] | the history pages being _read_ is fine, their content being _indexed_ is not :) |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1733x4] | Perhaps it's just indexing the user names which are also drug names! http://129.33.196.33/search/?index=Default&query=albendazole&queryTimeout=3000&ref=http%3A%2F%2F129.33.196.33%3A80%2Fsearch%2F%3Fquery%3Dalbendazole%26queryTimeout%3D3000%26index%3DDefault |
Should I exclude these http://www.rebol.net/w/index.php*?? | |
excluding http://www.rebol.net/w/* | |
Finished now at 27k pages ... | |
| Maxim 11-May-2010 [1737] | you should also index other sites, like www.codeconscious.com/rebol which has the best complementary view information out there, . it has helped me on sooo many occasions. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1738x2] | Guess I could do ... but this is just to see if the engine is good enough. |
I've started to crawl Brett's site .. hope he doesn't mind! | |
| Maxim 11-May-2010 [1740] | that was an example, but there are others... reboltutorial, Nick's learn programing site, Olde's flash site, rebol.org, rebol weekly news links, etc etc... I think that having a unique source for all of that rich rebol content is very usefull for everyone. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1741x5] | Well as I said someone has to decide if the quality of the search engine is good enough or not. |
And if so, we need a permanent host for it | |
Anyone want to do some comparison searchs between google, and this? | |
Probably has to be Carl as he is the one with the issues! | |
Looks like it might be using Oracle as the DB ... | |
| Andreas 12-May-2010 [1746x3] | well, one of carl's original issues looks just as bad with this search engine: http://129.33.196.33/search/?query=construct |
I can't find Carl's desired http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/functions/construct.html at all in above results :) | |
Seems parts of the R3 docs are not (yet?) indexed: http://129.33.196.33/search/?query=url%3Aconstruct | |
| Maxim 12-May-2010 [1749x2] | I looked at the html source and it should clearly float to the top. strange... its got everything needed to be scored high (title, H1, and many counts of construct in the page). |
Andreas, you're right... same with using a title search with construct. it returns nothing. | |
| Graham 12-May-2010 [1751x6] | Last crawled 31 December 1969 16:00:00.000 PST Crawler status 760 - Excluded by crawl space definition Parser and index status 0 - The document has not been added to the index. |
Looks like my rules were too tight | |
Hmm.. I had not exclusion rules for rebol.com ... you sure that there isn't a no robots directive higher in this path? | |
Adding http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/.... | |
if this construct page can't be found by any of the search engines ... is there a no robots directive ? | |
Looking for construct now brings up http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/functions/construct.html as the top item | |
| older newer | first last |