World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Graham 12-Jun-2005 [1246x5] | I just ran the View desktop, and was advised of a newer version.. which I duly downloaded. |
REBOL/View 1.3.0.3.1 10-Jun-2005 Core 2.6.0 Copyright 2000-2005 REBOL Technologies. All rights reserved. REBOL is a trademark of REBOL Technologies. WWW.REBOL.COM | |
So, looks like 1.3 has actually now been released. | |
And the familiar rebol icon is back again. | |
http://www.rebol.com/download.htmlshows the new download versions | |
Sunanda 12-Jun-2005 [1251x2] | Officially released 10-jun according to the download page: http://www.rebol.com/view-platforms.html |
[oops we typed at the same moment] | |
Graham 12-Jun-2005 [1253x3] | I guess it might be worthwhile waiting for LNS to do a library interface. |
Kill two birds with one stone as it were. | |
Now, where is Viewcmd 1.3 ? | |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1256x4] | rebol 1.3.0.3.1 final - upgrade command, and the result? "You are running an unknown version of REBOL." :-) |
what do you mean by "library interface" Gregg? | |
Can someone try 'call and 'sound interface? At least 'call seems to work, while when you start Desktop, those components are listed as "(View/Pro). If those are unlocked, then Desktop text should be enabled ... | |
enabled=corrected | |
Graham 12-Jun-2005 [1260] | well, my gomoku script which uses sound dies under 1.3 :( |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1261] | that is bad, and probably mistake by RT, not intention - they claimed sound will be free for 1.3. 'call seems to work here, but I have license key, so I wonder if I don't run /Pro. |
Graham 12-Jun-2005 [1262x2] | I have /pro license .. just saying that my script dies |
because of other problems with new View 1.3 | |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1264] | hmm, anyway - why console does not report anymore you are using license? That way I can't be sure if I run /Pro or not ... |
Graham 12-Jun-2005 [1265] | sound works for me |
Henrik 12-Jun-2005 [1266] | Is there a "proper" way to set font properties for a single element, such as 'text after the layout is created? I'm trying: view layout [a: text "12345" b: text "12345"] and set the font size for a: a/font/size: 14 (b is 12 at this point) then I unview it and: view layout [a: text "12345" b: text "12345"] once more. Now b has font size 14 as well. They seem to share the same font object.... |
Ashley 12-Jun-2005 [1267] | Does %user.r work with View 1.3. I add the following line to %/c/rebol/view/user.r print "User.r called" then double-click the %rebol.exe file in the same directory ... but no message. |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1268] | Henrik, in these cases you need a local font object. |
Henrik 12-Jun-2005 [1269] | and set the font size for a: a/font/size: 14 (b is 12 at this point) <--- I don't set a to a/font/size there although it looks that way, sorry. should be "and set the font size for the variable a to: a/font/size: 14" |
Ammon 12-Jun-2005 [1270] | I'm not sure just how that changed, Ashley, but I did hear some talk somewhere here about execution of user.r being removed because its a security issue... |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1271] | A and B share the same, so what you need to do is |
Ashley 12-Jun-2005 [1272] | view layout [a: text "12345" font-size 14 b: text "12345"] ? |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1273] | a/font: make a/font [size: 12] |
Henrik 12-Jun-2005 [1274x3] | ashley: I can't determine font size at layout time |
christianE: interesting, I'll try it. thanks | |
christianE: it seems to work, thanks :-) now to integrate it into my program... | |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1277x3] | You're welcome. |
Ah, should have mentioned that it's not necessary to do that *everytime* you change the fontsize. It's necessary only for the first time you alter it. | |
After that, you simply can A/FONT/SIZE: 13 | |
Henrik 12-Jun-2005 [1280x2] | I didn't think it was either :-) |
yes, works in my program too! solves an age old problem for me :-) | |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1282] | Shadwolf, yes, you're right. Today VID is a bit loosing the focus in favour of REBOL/View 1.3.0 and probably RebGUI, but I'm sure there will be efforts again. |
shadwolf 12-Jun-2005 [1283] | RebGUI have it's own phylosophy first make tiny useful widget set that take the lead over VID ... |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1284] | someone tried to port Cyphre's menu to RebGUI? |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1285x2] | Yes, it's a whole new approach. |
Shadwolf is doing so. | |
shadwolf 12-Jun-2005 [1287] | but my ask in the reflexion process is why to consum less code less memory less CPU and be sharpen if we are only at the level of what we can see with winAPI .... |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1288] | ChristianE's looks more polished, but - way too large, especially for Carl to include it in official distro - 75KB ... |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1289] | No, it's really no 75 KB pure code, far less. |
shadwolf 12-Jun-2005 [1290x3] | We must IMOO have a widget set that is similar than what are people habbits and be smoother and able to be distinguish directly |
I think Rebgui could be an OS independent link to user Interaction | |
we abstract from OS capabilities and set of widget and we introduce a commun set | |
ChristianE 12-Jun-2005 [1293] | That's right, shadwolf. My approach was more of the kind of simulating existing OSes, I had a need for that. |
shadwolf 12-Jun-2005 [1294] | this is in my opinion the same intent as GTK+, WxWindow, TK, QT and other in this mood libraries ;) |
Pekr 12-Jun-2005 [1295] | As I said - we need tree-view, grid (or little better list), tabs, group-box, and maybe even menu. Those missing styles will make it difficult to newbies to start using View as full-fledged dev-tool replacement .... |
older newer | first last |