r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Script Library] REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive

Robert
23-Jan-2010
[949]
If it's that small, it should be possible to do a clean-room development.
NickA
23-Jan-2010
[950]
It would be great for us to have a little "rent-a-reboler" site, 
at which anyone wanting REBOL features like this (or even scripts 
- any sort of development work), could post a job and developers 
could reply with bids.  That could give RT motivation to add features 
that only certain users are interested in initially, and I bet we'd 
see lots of features get added to REBOL3 as extensions.  I'd love 
to support REBOL by paying for little features that I need/want. 
 Animated GIFs are not a priority for me, but I can think of at least 
10 low level functions that I'd buy.
Robert
23-Jan-2010
[951]
Make a list and let us know. And attach a number that we have a baseline 
to discuss about.
NickA
23-Jan-2010
[952]
Will do :)
Pekr
23-Jan-2010
[953]
;-) It is just exactly the same, as I tried to propose Bounty system, 
yet noone was really interested
Henrik
23-Jan-2010
[954]
Pekr, I don't know, but maybe it's the wording? "Bounty" versus "rent-a-reboler". 
I haven't seen many examples of bounties that actually worked.
Pekr
23-Jan-2010
[955x2]
ok, i tried to take a bit different aproach. I thought, that I might 
support some efforts with 100 USD per month or two. I would choose, 
which project I would contribute to ... if there would be more such 
ppl, eventually willing to spend 50/month, our fellow rebol developers 
would not necessarily work for free. Even if it does not make one 
for a living, I think it might be at least nicely motivating ...
maybe we could just join both aproaches into one ...
Robert
23-Jan-2010
[957]
A bit OT here but: IMO what's required is a cooridnated approach 
for this. If everyone is doing a bit here and there, movement is 
to slow and spend efforts won't have the highst possible impact.
Brock
23-Jan-2010
[958]
... conversely if the pieces are small enough, and can be done by 
one coder in a relatively short amount of time, many small pieces 
would get completed.  You know the saying, "pennies make dollars".
Robert
23-Jan-2010
[959]
Yes, but it should be visible in one place that it's happening and 
things move. The results can be put into Rebol.org
Maxim
23-Jan-2010
[960]
bounties have to be worth the time.  if I work  at X$ an hour and 
a bounty offers 1-2 hours worth of work for something that may take 
a day... its not worth it
Graham
2-Mar-2010
[961x3]
http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=tiffreader.r

Rebol Tiff viewer
Not clear if it can displayed compressed Tiff images ( fax )
Hmm.. can't display any of my scanned images :(
Anton
9-Jun-2010
[964]
Hooray, I finally found the Contribute A Script link !!
Gregg
10-Jun-2010
[965x2]
Where did you look firs?
firs = first.
Anton
12-Jun-2010
[967]
Just about everywhere; I found some faq or doc referring to the "control 
panel", which I couldn't locate. Eventually I realised that I needed 
to login as a library member, not just a regular member, so I created 
an account. Even after that it took a while :)
Sunanda
13-Jun-2010
[968x2]
Full marks for persistance!

Apologies -- the FAQ is out of date, especially Part 3 that tells 
you (wrongly!) how to contribute scripts.
I'll update it in the next couple of days.
Thanks for reporting the problem.
The FAQ is updated now.....Let's hope it won't be so painful for 
other potential contributers.
Thanks again, Anton.
Anton
14-Jun-2010
[970]
Well, thankyou for being responsive, Sunanda.
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[971]
Anton reported that that algorithm the Script Library uses for suggesting 
script names when a name is mistyped was failing to produce some 
obvious matches.
Thanks Anton.
Algorithm tweaked.....Please suggest other improvements!
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[972x2]
I'd suggest recognizing 3D as the beginning of a name could be an 
encoding error
I'd also like to see the download link so I can copy and paste into 
the rebol console
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[974]
Thanks for the comments, Graham.


3D....Possibly.....But there is one script whose name begins 3D (grandfathered 
in before we insisted names start witha letter), so it could be genuine.


Download....From the "sorry did you mean" page, you are one click 
away from the download link -- so would cluttering that page with 
extra links be that helpful to those who want to view a script.
Anton
22-Jul-2010
[975]
Mmm... also it seems wrong to try to fix another program's error. 
The original program with the error should be fixed, not all the 
programs which might get its erroneous output.
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[976x4]
Normally people paste links like this http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=tiffreader.r
Sure Anton .. fix your email client !
But those links are not usable by Rebol
So I have to right click on the download link and copy link location
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[980]
True.....But the page you get to does have a "download script" link. 
 That is usable by REBOL.
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[981]
I'd rather just you fix the direct link so that it's usable by Rebol 
... or, put the download on the page so I can double click and control 
C
Anton
22-Jul-2010
[982]
I'm fairly sure it's not my email client (which is Thunderbird). 
I thought it was some problem with ecartis which we never got around 
to fixing.
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[983]
Or, you have some javascript that copies the download link to my 
clipboard
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[984x2]
We did try to make the direct link usable by REBOl......But that 
is not easy as we have to escape chats like & and <
chats ==> chars !
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[986x2]
well, just detect what client it is and send the right thing
if the client is rebol .. we want the script !
Anton
22-Jul-2010
[988]
Link as above not usable by rebol; because PATH-THRU has simplistic 
algorithm for mapping url -> filepath, isn't it?
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[989]
Nice idea, Graham..... But the REBOL script might be a spider/inder 
like RIX; and so expects a HTML page.
We can't second guess cases like that.
Anton
22-Jul-2010
[990]
But yeah, I think it should be a bit less work to change rebol.org's 
urls than improve rebol's path-thru.
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[991]
yes you can ... because a spider will identify itself
Anton
22-Jul-2010
[992x3]
Bugger the javascript idea !  (Gawd!)
That's just piling on complexity.
(and I don't run with javascript most of the time).
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[995]
anyway I don't think it matters what spiders pull down
Sunanda
22-Jul-2010
[996]
No need for second guessing -- REBOL.org already has the "feed me 
a plain text" link -- use the Download script link for that.
That's simplicity......Isn't it!?
Graham
22-Jul-2010
[997x2]
just a few characters difference
No, because you cause every single person who recieves a rebol org 
link extra work