World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
eFishAnt 1-Jan-2005 [8x3] | this started happening .between 1225031 and 1226031 is the exact change |
append pane make label [offset: xy text: char] ;is where the problem is generated, but I don't yet see why. | |
xy is calculated to the right value, like 0x51 for "A" column label ... but when the label is make'd the cellsize, 100x20 gets stuffed into the offset as well. | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [11] | There was a discussion of this somewhere ......REBOL or REBOL2 worlds? And a solutiion found. I forget what it was. The library version of Rebocalc has not been changed for several years: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/script-history.r?script-name=rebocalc.r So the issue is a change in behaviour in REBOL/View |
eFishAnt 1-Jan-2005 [12x3] | RAMBO #3526 |
ah, he just crammed it in there. That could be done, but a patch, rather than a fix ... ;-/ | |
Is there a place where the older change log (meaning back to View 1.2.25.0.31 at least) is stored? | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [15] | Thanks for finding it on RAMBO. I've updated the script n REBOL.org....Also enabled it to run under the plugin: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/run-plugin.r?script-name=rebocalc.r |
eFishAnt 1-Jan-2005 [16x2] | did it work for you? I don't think that patch works. |
It draws the headings for COLUMNS but not the cells... | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [18] | It works for me under the plugin -- but that's an older version, so may not make any difference. Not tried the version that breaks the original script. |
eFishAnt 1-Jan-2005 [19x2] | ah...wait...it does work..some other debug code in my script I was testing it in...I had isolated the same thing he did. |
however, I think there is some underlying bug which needs to be fixed... | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [21] | Agreed -- Could be 100s of scripts out there with the same problem. Backward compatibility is important. |
eFishAnt 1-Jan-2005 [22x2] | make label [offset: xy] ;seems like it should work. I am making a tiny script to see how much is needed to repeat it. |
(nice to see it run in the plug-in...neat demo for that) | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [24] | Pretty much any View script should be able to run in the plugin. REBOL.org doesn't offer the plugin as a default . The script owner has to tell us explicity that it can run under the plugin: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/one-click-submission-help.r?help=plugin |
ICarii 1-Jan-2005 [25x2] | anton: the behavior I was expecting is as follows: to-binary integer! value -> binary of smallest possible byte size. Example: n: between 0 and 255 to-binary n -> single byte binary #{XX} n: between 256 and 65535 to-binary n -> 2 byte binary #{XXXX} n: between 65536 and 16777215 to-binary n -> 3 byte binary #{XXXXXX} etc. |
endianness is a factor - but that could be handled by a reverse could it not? | |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2005 [27] | to-binary treats its input as a string -- not a number -- and converts each byte to it's hex ASCII respresentation -- not ar all an intuitive meaning for to-binary. Even worse, perhaps is >> enbase/base "23" 2 == "0011001000110011" which appears to have converted to binary. But, again, it's the ASCII for "2" and "3" not the binary for 23. |
Gabriele 1-Jan-2005 [28x4] | >> debase/base to-hex 23 16 == #{00000017} |
i think that TO should handle this case though. it's very useful. | |
and if you need it in the platform's endianess, then you can just use a struct! | |
>> s: make struct! [val [integer!]] [0] >> s/val: 23 == 23 >> third s == #{17000000} | |
Anton 1-Jan-2005 [32] | Doesn't look like there is a rambo ticket for this issue... want to create one? |
Gabriele 3-Jan-2005 [33] | Ladislav, I think your ticket about the GC bug with parse has been lost in the crash. |
Ladislav 4-Jan-2005 [34] | OK, will try to put it there again |
Gabriele 4-Jan-2005 [35] | i think i have set to tested almost all the bugs that were tested. please check the waiting for testing list again to make sure i didn't miss anything. |
Gregg 4-Jan-2005 [36x3] | #3533 - think I marked it before. Tested OK on 2.5.57 under W2K. |
#3560 - Tested OK on 2.5.57 under W2K. | |
Oops, that's a Linux bug. Sorry. | |
Gabriele 4-Jan-2005 [39x2] | yep i have 3533 ok-ed from you already. |
3436 has been changed too (now just throws a normal error) so will need testing again on the new build | |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [41x2] | Weird RAMBO behavior... Waiting for Approval shows one ticket with blank information. |
(maybe Carl?) | |
Gabriele 4-Jan-2005 [43] | you mean, "New submissions"? |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [44] | both |
Gabriele 4-Jan-2005 [45x3] | it's a blank ticket submitted (i guess) because of an early click on the submit button |
it should be delete but i can't do it | |
*deleted | |
Volker 5-Jan-2005 [48x2] | with the new cores input does not work on my system. a knoppix 3.4/ct. i see cursor, but no chars are accepted. on nother linux it works. happens with rebols since the redicretion-change. has somebody seen that problem too, or have i messed up my system? |
(linux, that is) | |
Gabriele 5-Jan-2005 [50x2] | could it be a TERMCAP problem or something like that? |
if you open console://, can you get anything out of it? | |
Volker 5-Jan-2005 [52x2] | No. wait or first just hang. |
do not know about termcap | |
Gabriele 5-Jan-2005 [54] | is anyone able to reproduce it? i'm sure that if we can let Carl reproduce this he will fix it. |
ICarii 6-Jan-2005 [55] | I've tried the recent linux alpha on Fedora Core 2 (redhat) and it works great - seems to be a debian base issue - has anyone tried it on a sarge build? I've tested an old woody build and a new woody build with the same hang result. |
Gabriele 7-Jan-2005 [56x2] | what could be different in Debian? |
[I hate these kind of things: there's so much (useless) complexity underneath that you have no idea why something is not working] | |
older newer | first last |