World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Janko 4-Apr-2009 [3550] | I wouldn't build stemmer into search engine .. keep it slim :) .. In my case with solr I process the docs before I index them and then I do the same to search queries .. it's all outside of solr.. |
Sunanda 4-Apr-2009 [3551] | Skimp already, in effect has a plugin: make-word-list. That defines what a "word" is. One way to implement stemming would be to make stemming a plugin to make-word-list. But I have not really thought about that yet: http://www.rebol.org/documentation.r?script=make-word-list.r |
Janko 4-Apr-2009 [3552] | I needed a specific stemmer ... porter stemmer fits english well but not so my language and I needed to do a lot of synonims for specific field search was used in |
[unknown: 5] 7-Apr-2009 [3553x2] | For anyone that needs a backlink to their REBOL related pages of their website, I offer a REBOL links thread here http://www.tretbase.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=33 |
It does get scanned by Google, Yahoo, MSN, and other bots. | |
Sunanda 7-Apr-2009 [3555] | Good idea Paul..... Another opportunity to present yourself to the world in a REBOL context is the members' pages at REBOL.org. Also highly friendly to Google and other search engines (No 1 in in Google for [I've tinkered with a lot of different languages] :-) http://www.rebol.org/lmp-index.r |
[unknown: 5] 7-Apr-2009 [3556] | I need to look into that. I think I only submitted one script to REBOL.org so far. |
Sunanda 7-Apr-2009 [3557] | You do not have to be a script contributer to have a library member's page. |
Brock 7-Apr-2009 [3558] | ah, slipping a little, now 'I've tinkered with a lot of different languages' is listed as the second page in Google! ;-) |
Sunanda 7-Apr-2009 [3559] | Google has many data centers, none quite synchronised. Results are semi reandom :-) |
[unknown: 5] 8-May-2009 [3560] | Anyone here have a patent and if so, where is your patent? US, elsewhere, etc... Also, what concerns did you have when you filed your patent or problems you faced? |
Henrik 8-May-2009 [3561] | Never did. Never will. |
Geomol 8-May-2009 [3562] | Never did. Probably never will. |
Dockimbel 8-May-2009 [3563] | Paul, I guess that it's about your compression methods. Maybe this analysis can help or even enlight you : http://gailly.net/05533051.html |
Geomol 8-May-2009 [3564] | That's quite funny! (And stupid.) |
Reichart 8-May-2009 [3565x2] | I have patents, just type in the word patent and my last name... |
I have helped file patents for 25 years... I'm not sure what your real question is though. | |
[unknown: 5] 8-May-2009 [3567x2] | Thanks Doc, yeah that document is tied to comp.compression group. I know that group and have read their materials. Thanks anyway though. |
Reichart, do you have any patents through other offices other than the US Patent office? Curious about costs you typically seen for filing and is your patents utility or design patents? | |
Reichart 8-May-2009 [3569] | I hold patents in many fields, and around the world. Costs are tricky. In general, a patent is not worth it in the big scheme of things. You best have something amazing. Today, coming up with a patent in compression would not really matter, since it would just annoy people, i.e. the Unisys patent inside GIF. Let's say you came up with a way to make something 50% smaller even, but if you patent it, and no one will touch it, does it really matter? And then, WHO would touch it, knowing that it is not open? Is it really worth it. Keep in mind, I made a lot of money specifically selling compression technology. If you did much better, like 70% over the next best open system, then it might become worth something. You have to weigh the value. But figure to file outside of America will cost half again what it cost in America. That can range from you doing it your self (a few grand all said, to an average of $8K - $12K ). I personally have never paid less than $20K just in America. But my patents tend to be well researched (better than most people do for their patents). The patent "search" is the expensive part. |
[unknown: 5] 8-May-2009 [3570] | Well the way I look at it - if I do get compression working then I'm willing to pay $10k for a patent and go after patents for it internationally. I think it will market if it works. |
Henrik 9-May-2009 [3571] | You would have to defend the patent as well, if you want to keep it valid. That may cost way more than the patent itself. I personally think that patenting an algorithm is a surefire way of avoiding widespread use. |
Pekr 9-May-2009 [3572] | We wanted ti patent our CCD camera ethernet interface, but we were adiced to not to do so, because even if there would be some patent violation, you have to start court case in the given country, and we would have to be really rich, to affort that ... |
Janko 9-May-2009 [3573] | Would patenting a compression algoritm be a "software patent" ? |
ICarii 9-May-2009 [3574] | yes - patenting algorithms is something that only the USA seems to be doing.. it gets a little stupid in the end.. |
[unknown: 5] 9-May-2009 [3575] | Thanks for the comments. Regarding protection of patents - this is an area where I believe the patent search is important. If your lawyers have done a good patent search then I think the only defense your doing is for those that are infringing on your patent. In which case I think you stand to make MORE $$$ if that is the case. |
Robert 9-May-2009 [3576] | Paul, forget patents. Not worth. I hold 13, costs a lot, takes endless time and if a big player is infringing it you won't have enough $$$ to get your rights. |
[unknown: 5] 9-May-2009 [3577] | Well let's discuss that Robert. How can it not be worth it if I hold the patent? I would get the $$$ if I win the case against anyone infringing which will be the case so I don't get your conclusions here. |
Anton 9-May-2009 [3578] | if: func [cond then-block [block!]][do then-block] |
TomBon 9-May-2009 [3579] | paul, what robert mean is that a patent is worthless until you have enough power to defend it. Unfortunatly I have the same experience, to expensive and if a real big player like to take it, they will get it even if it takes years, your money and nerves. there are enough simple and dirty tricks to dry you out. only speed helps here in my opinion. |
[unknown: 5] 9-May-2009 [3580] | I guess I don't get how they can TAKE it? |
Robert 10-May-2009 [3581] | Simple: They just use it and don't pay you. It's your turn to claim your rights. It's your effort, money etc. you have to spend They just continue to use your idea. |
Maarten 10-May-2009 [3582] | A great example is the RIM patent infringement - they got away with it until theyw ere big enough and then simply paid. |
Gregg 11-May-2009 [3583] | The idea of having a patent seems great, and can be very exciting. I'm co-inventor on one--just granted--and the company got together to discuss whether it was worth it to go international, add a continuation, etc. It's a long process, and has taken many years and a lot of money to get to this point. As we talked, we looked at who might pay for it. To make it worthwhile, we would need to go after big companies who would fight tooth and nail, and cost everybody more money and time. The best hope is to get *one* big company to acquire it for a reasonable sum, and let them add it to their arsenal for bartering and battle with other big companies. Other than that, it may keep our small competitors at bay in that area. For us, it's clear that we would rather be doing real work than fighting legal battles. So, the product will now have a patent # associated with it, rather than "patent pending", and maybe we'll make something on it, but nobdoy is planning to get rich on licensing it. |
Maxim 11-May-2009 [3584] | I`ve read that many companies get patents, as patent infringement protection... if you sue them they'll couter claim whatever you infringe on their patents. cause let's face it, basically every single piece of software on the planet infringes at least one patent in the US or Canada. |
[unknown: 5] 11-May-2009 [3585x2] | Yeah, I'm thinking you guys are right which is why if I get my stuff to a point of production that I'm not going to go with a patent and sell it to Microsoft. |
Graham the retaliation has begun, I will go further if you want to continue to be an asshole. | |
Reichart 11-May-2009 [3587] | Uh...............what did Graham do? |
[unknown: 5] 11-May-2009 [3588x2] | He decided to delete my groups. |
But don't care anymore. Delete my account please. | |
Reichart 11-May-2009 [3590x2] | Hmmm.... |
Hmmmm. Ok, let me go confirm a couple of things, and then I will honour your request, figure 24 hours... | |
[unknown: 5] 11-May-2009 [3592] | k |
Pekr 11-May-2009 [3593] | I am not sure why Graham should delete anything? Maybe he just removed someone mistakenly from some group? |
Graham 11-May-2009 [3594x2] | We should not be opted in to someone's belief systems. |
That's spamming us. | |
[unknown: 5] 11-May-2009 [3596] | Nope he purposely did it. He is not supposed to be doing such things. He didn't even have to come into the group so his spamming argument is a pathetic attempt for sympathy. |
Graham 11-May-2009 [3597] | What are you accusing me of?? |
[unknown: 5] 11-May-2009 [3598] | Exactly what you did Graham. You deleted groups. Your not a master. |
Graham 11-May-2009 [3599] | Hmm. What proof is there that I did this?? |
older newer | first last |