World: r3wp

Looks good to me. BTW, the mk2: in

    not match data [mk1: rules* mk2: (mk2: change/part mk1 prod mk2) 
    :mk1]
isn't used by your code. Did you mean mk1: instead?

The mk2: in the paren I mean..

What you mean here depends on whether you intend the rewrite to go 
through the entire data set before doing another pass (then you change 
the mk2: to mk1: ), or whether you want the next pass to pick up 
exactly where the previous one started (then you remove the mk2: 
as it isn't used).

Looking further t the docs, it appears that the existing behavior 
is what you intend. Better locality I guess. In that case, you might 
as well remove the mk2: from inside the paren in that line, as it 
doesn't do anything.

Gabriele's need to delimit the rules with '| brings up another old 
mezzanine thought: rejoin/with. I created a separate mezz, called 
DELIMIT, but this is a fairly common need IME. Should we start another 
ML thread? :-)

start another RAMBO thread :-) ... add it as a wish - I think it 
is the only channel RT actually scans, but of course not sure ...

Brian, yes, that's because earlier i had :mk2 after the paren, but 
I changed it to :mk1 because it's faster when you want to iteratively 
apply a rule.

That's the locality I was talking about.

The match functiion has a line
    parse block recurse
near the end that should be
    parse data recurse

Gabriele, rewrite - very nice and I expect endlessly useful. Thanks 
for publishing it.

Here is a suggestion for match - add /any and /case refinements like 
the parse refinements, and then change the line:
    parse data recurse
to this line, indented properly if needed:

    do pick pick [[parse parse/case] [parse/all parse/all/case]] none? 
    all none? case data recurse


It's the quickest way to pass along refinements I've figured out 
yet, short of rebcode apply.

Once rebcode is in REBOL, it would be a quicker way to implement 
match. That apply operation is nice.

After going nuts for some while now, I'll ask the community maybe 
someoe has a good tip for me:

I need an application that can do two things with more than 2 persons 
at the same time:
- video conferencing

- application sharing (or at least having one exporting his desktop 
to a number of users)


I thought that netmeeting might be good but it's quite old and doesn't 
seem to be further developed.

http://ultravnc.sourceforge.net/? for the sharing part. and something 
else for video?

Who should use UltraVNC?


Anyone who needs to support local or remote Windows users will find 
UltraVNC a must-have tool. It was specifically designed to answer 
the needs of:

    * Help desk (Internal & External)
    * IT departments

    * Home users that wants to help their relatives and friends or access 
    their home PC from work or cybercafés

there exists portrait from MS research...

Why hasn't someone added skype like feature to VNC yet?

closed source :)

why both in one application?

vnc is closed source? Ah, didn't knew that.

skype.

skype can only handle 1:1 video conferencing and I din't find a good 
app-sharing module yet.

I have finde some stuff:
- MS Research portrait (not tested)

- ivisit (seems to be a cool approach, P2P based, interesting app-sharing 
concept: just define an area of your screen to share)
- feestoon (skype plugin, not yet tested)
- good old netmeeting

Anyone fluent in Python here?  (respond privately pls)

Need a second pair of eyes to review some code...

Max is ...

Terry might still be

I think Tim Johnson is, he's on the ML.

Anyone done any work on rebol and LDAP?  Only stuff I've seen is 
the first couple hits on google such as http://softinnov.org/rebol/ldap.shtml
that haven't been updated in a long while

What do you want to know?  WE support LDAP and RADIUS in Qtask.

LDAP and RADIUS? as authN method? Implemented in REBOL? That would 
be interesting...

Where did you say the source was published ;-) ?

: ) We have not published that source, but I'm cool with it being 
published.  It is not fully tested yet, in fact it will be tested 
very soon.  You have to pound on Edgar to get him to post the source.

LDAP? Holly cow! :-)

Yes, Qtask Enterprise is designed to be dropped right into a server 
farm and start working.  We are working on WebDAV soon as well.

Just wanting to see how much work it would be to authenicate to an 
LDAP in an application

So it's good to hear that you have developed a REBOL LDAP interface 
for QTask

If there is anyone like myself who just scratched their head and 
said what in the blazes is LDAP? http://raleigh.pm.org/ldap-talk.html
 is a nicely done   page. Of course now I want it!

The softinnov link to the LDAP solution above might be the wrong 
one ... I think you want to look at http://softinnov.org/rebol/ntlm.shtml
instead i.e. how does a rebol script authenticate in the microsoft 
nltm world ... which uses ActiveDirectory.   NTLM has been rebranded 
as Integrated Windows Authentication.   

These links may also be useful 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDAP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTLM


My view is that without easy NTLM support we will be very handicapped 
using rebol scripts ....


If running a REBOL script as CGI under IIS, the user information 
is available in the script after IIS has taken care of the challenge. 
 Such support is not available (AFAIK) in Xitami and many other servers.

The REBOL ML "refused" to accept my contribution twice, is there 
anything wrong with it?

are you still subscribed?

try re-subscribing

Current account flags for 'lmecir@...' on 'rebol':

	ECHOPOST

yet it bounces my posts

tomc is the mailing list man

there was a ML group, but  I don't see it, has it been deleted?

hmm.

Can't see it either.

ladislav, what error does it give you back?

ah, i see the messages went thru. so maybe it was a temporary problem.