World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1897] | rebol.org is the library site and the mailing list site. It's not an aggregator site. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1898x3] | Must it be rebol-only, or can it be a meeting-place for other languages/topics too? Which would be cool in case we do it in rebol. |
Agree with Graham. Its more our script-lexicon, not the palace. | |
And agree with Reichart that such a site would be cool. (Reading the "full own server"-part) | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1901] | I don't know what they can do better, my only point is, don't let our inability to find a Rebol solution to a problem stop us from finding a solution to the problem. IOS is great as long as it is an "Open" IOS servers. Meaning EVERYONE is welcome. I want to see an end to any form of elitism in the Rebol community. It hurts everyone. Yes, I'm clear on what Rebol.org is, still looks like it was designed by the Incarceration committee for the Federal government. Other languages, SURE. That only drives traffic. Although it would probably end up being just in the forums. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1902] | (Full own server could mean uniserv2 (forgot the real name) and a fast vanilla based on that. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1903] | We don't have that many people here who have design skills |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1904] | Graham wins the "first to say something can't be done" award. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1905] | Unless they are paid and can spend more time? |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1906x3] | thanks. |
What's so pizzaz about the ruby site ? | |
Are you sure you're not just venting ?? | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1909] | We don't design anything, we find a site that already looks great, and use it. Pay homage, as we like to say. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1910] | I see IOS more like a quick meeting-place. Want to do something, set up new server. Together with web-publishing. Say we have a few licenses for some projects. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1911x2] | I agree we should use off the shelf components. |
This not invented here thing gets tiresome. | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1913x2] | Ruby's site is actually pretty cool, and my fav part is: Ruby 1.8.4 released! [2005-12-24] by maki Ruby 1.8.4 has been released. on the first line. It means it is ALIVE, people are posting, stuff is HAPPENING. How about you help, by finding sites that are even better, as opposed to questioning the few sites I found? |
And venting does not come with offers to pay for stuff...it does not come with solutions. Lets move forward and MAKE something. | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1915] | I don't go to non rebol language sites ! |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1916] | How looks vanilla? I like it, by i am no art-guy. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1917x2] | I tried using vanilla for this purpose ... but I'm not a graphics/design guy |
and vanilla is so sloooooow | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1919] | Your server had technical problems. First i was reluctant to spawn a process, then i forgot a bit about it. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1920] | well, it was actually a rebol problem .. I wasn't the only one to report hanging daemons. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1921] | I heard there is a combination of uniserv and vanilla, which is much faster. I guess vanilla runs on a daemon then. by cgi, it scans tons of files each time. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1922] | And here's another attempt using mediawiki http://compkarori.com/rebolwiki/index.php/Main_Page |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1923x2] | I know. Sorry for wording. |
Wanted topoint out: This is a dedicated box. | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1925x2] | I think you're talking about implementation details .. whereas R is looking at the overall picture. |
I guess we're talking about finding a portal ... | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1927] | No, wanted to push vanilla a bit. I think you are hit by bad experience. |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1928] | I'm open to what every one agrees on. If it works it works, if it does not it does not. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1929] | well, you can run vanilla .. but someone needs to customise it to give it that inviting/live look. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1930x2] | How much load/data etc do you expect? |
I hope the original developers are interested. Have seen some different looks, if that developers jump in? | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1932] | Hard to tell. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1933x4] | This is a vanilla site heavily customised by Chris http://www.ross-gill.com/ |
I think it needs a news section, a chat section, a download section, a place to vote and comment on software. | |
what about this site http://www.zope.org/ | |
The Web Site for the Zope Community | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1937x2] | http://www.compkarori.com/vanillai like the calendar. |
(btw in 3 days you can make a 1000days-party :) | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1939] | hehe |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1940x2] | Its possible to run multiple vanillas. Then each project can have its own look. |
Sharing user-accounts, maybe some way of cross-linking, maybe changing the dialects in a more rebol-way. | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1942x3] | now, that was a news site ... blog etc... but after a 1000 days, not a single news entry except by myself. |
so, I'm somewhat pessemistic about a community collaboration on such a project. | |
this is not a problem that can be solved by throwing a server at it .. as we already done that. | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1945] | The best place to look may be the french community? |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1946] | who knows ... |
older newer | first last |