Mailing list home
  Find posts   Help

Latest messageRecent messages

Other threads:
 Prev: ALTME: First group of questions answered,
 Next: ALTME: QA?

 Random thread

Indexes:
 By topic
 By date
 By author
 By subject
Join the Mailing List....
AccessibilityAbout / FAQ
Member's loungeContact/FeedbackOther REBOL links
Membership:
member name

password

Remember?

Not a member? Please join
1-Dec 2:42 UTC
[0.066] 9.487k
Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

bugs are discouraging (was MAKE-DIR Problem)

 [1/3] from: alban::gabillon::univ-pau::fr at: 22-Nov-2002 12:48


Hi Anton, Thank you for your answer I'll report this bug but as you said, most probably, they are aware of it. Why don't they correct all these basic bugs related to ftp? Such bugs discourage newbies like me. I am currently doing some research in my university. I intended to use rebol for prototyping. I think I am going to give up this idea. Is the rebol language only for specialists who are able to rewrite most of the functions by themselves ? AG

 [2/3] from: lennart:nylen:biz at: 22-Nov-2002 17:54


2002-11-22 12:48:38, "Alban Gabillon" <[Alban--Gabillon--univ-pau--fr]> wrote: Greetings fellow student!
>Why don't they correct all these basic bugs related to ftp?
Please be aware that REBOL has not been around as long as e.g. C or PERL. It is still under devleopment and if I'm not mistaken you're probably using a 'stable' release and not the latest public betas available over at http://www.reboltech.com/downloads/ (Ending a sentence with a URL is a bit tricky. Should one omit the period or should one risk giving people "faulty" URLs?). Essentially, Carl et al are probably working on it.
>Such bugs discourage newbies like me. >I am currently doing some research in my university. I intended to >use rebol for prototyping. I think I am going to give up this idea.
I don't know what type of prototyping you intend to perform. With that said I do think it seems a bit premature to give up on REBOL just because it doesn't work flawlessly out of the box? Your at uni - rise to the challenge. >Insert prefered deity here> knows that you'll end up working with a lot worse programming languages than REBOL (as you can see I presume you're a CS student of some sort).
>Is the rebol language only for specialists who are able to rewrite >most of the functions by themselves ?
No, but programming is presently not for all. IMNSHO REBOL is a big step in the right direction as it's much more natural than quite a few other languages out there. Yours Sincerely /Lennart Fridén ([lennart--nylen--biz]) The World is not sane so why should I be?

 [3/3] from: al:bri:xtra at: 23-Nov-2002 9:34


Lennart Fridén wrote:
> It is still under development and if I'm not mistaken you're probably
using a 'stable' release and not the latest public betas available over at http://www.reboltech.com/downloads/ (Ending a sentence with a URL is a bit tricky. Should one omit the period or should one risk giving people "faulty" URLs?). I'd write it like this http://www.reboltech.com/downloads/ . With a space between the URL and the period. Andrew Martin ICQ: 26227169 http://valley.150m.com/