[REBOL] Re: P2P Q&A
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 4-Oct-2001 11:01
Richard Smolak wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[holger--rebol--com]>
> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:30 PM
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: P2P Q&A
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:04PM +0200, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> > > I am not sure I remember it correctly, but does Cyphre mean following? :
> > > when you hid face, containing sub-faces, all timer in subsequent faces
> > > stopped/removed from queue? Cyphre?
> > AFAIR this is fixed. I don't remember if the fix is in the current View
> > release though.
> Yes, the problem with recursive removing time-events when face is 'hide is
> fixed(If I remember from last version of /Link or so..).
> But I think we need sometimes recursively remove/freeze time events without
> hiding the face. I know, we can recursively search the whole face-tree and
> set rate to 0 or so(this would be sloow when searching more complex faces)
> but why not use the part of code from 'hide command and make similar one for
> example 'freeze. So when you: freeze my-face , my-face and all its subfaces
> won't receive time events but still remains shown...this will work like tap
> in pipe cascade of event-tree...
I wonder what happened to my proposed find/deep or locate suggestion. If it
would implemented in C level, it would fly ...