[REBOL] Re: Calling a Rebol Script form a CGI
From: pwawood:gma:il at: 28-Dec-2008 13:54
Gabriele
Thanks. I guess from you suggestion, it isn't easy (or perhaps not
even possible) for the called rebol session to have its own terminal
session.
On 27 Dec 2008, at 19:23, Gabriele Santilli wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Peter W A Wood <pwawood-gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> call "/Applications/Rebol/rebol -cs called.r"
>
> I assume you are on OSX, or some other Unix. You'll want to try
> something like:
>
> call "/Applications/Rebol/rebol -qws called.r >/dev/null </dev/
> null"
I'm testing on OS X, the live system is on Windows.
> If the script output is of any importance, you'll want to redirect it
> to a log file instead, eg.
>
> call "/Applications/Rebol/rebol -qws called.r
>>> /path/to/logfile.txt </dev/null"
It is useful to see the output during testing. It looks as though re-
directing the output will be the best option. For compatibility, it
would seem best to use the /output refinement.
I tried the /output refinement with an "out" argument of #[none] which
I though would be the equivalent of ">/dev/null" but it had no effect.
Is this the expected behaviour?
Regards
Peter
When I tried the
