[REBOL] Re: Updates to hof script
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 16-Nov-2002 10:50
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, 8:39:58 AM, you wrote:
JS> I am sure there are better ways to explain this. But all
JS> I can do for now is to go through it again - but this
JS> time ignoring a type checker.
I think the problem here is with the notation. Most people is not
familiar with it, and it is not intuitive enough to be able to
guess what it means without someone telling you.
>> Mapping two series via binary function:
>> ((a -+ b -+ c) -+ [a] -+ [b] -+ [c])
Would a notation such as:
((a b -> c) [a] [b] -> [c])
be more easy to understand by a casual reader?
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r