[REBOL] Re: Series comparison techniques
From: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 14-Aug-2003 18:44
Volker Nitsch wrote:
>Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>
>>Hi Ashley,
>>
>>On Thursday, August 14, 2003, 5:56:03 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>AT> returned results in .015, .063 and .59 seconds respectively. Which got me
>>
> to short
> ~ 0.063 * 10
>
I messed with spaces..
.015 (to short), .063 and .59 (~ 10 * .063) seconds. which ifts with
your *10-increments.
>AFAIK most multitaskers do 50 or so switches a second. so their
>resolution is ~0.01.
>if the first example needs really 0.006 seconds, that would be not visible.
>
Also long ago PC-clocks had such poor resolution. Do not now if that has
improved.
