[REBOL] Re: Rugby revival
From: maarten:vrijheid at: 14-Aug-2003 18:07
> MK> - How should the functions be named? You'll have rexec, sexec,
serve
> and
> MK> get-rugby-service. Should they be changed?
>
> Not a big deal to me if they should change, since I'd be changing the
> code that uses them anyway. I'm all for clear names.
>
OK, then I 'll stick to the legacy conventions ;-)
> MK> - What other functionality should be present? I know that some
people
> MK> want more fine-grained access control than IP numbers, but are
there
> MK> other features you'd wish?
>
> One of my favorite features is ease of use. You can add whatever you
> want as long as I can do the basics with a minimum of code (i.e. as
> little as possible for me to screw up :).
OK, you just want get-rugby-service, serve and rexec like they are then.
I am trying to stay as close to the current functionality as possible,
but with async added.
> MK> - I am planning to release all this under the GPL with the option
to
> buy
> MK> a non-gpl license (including redistribution) in the $50-100 range.
> Given
> MK> that I've put a lot of my time in it that seems reasonable to me,
but
> MK> what do you think?
>
> Your call entirely; as long as there is a commercial license of some
> kind available. It does mean you couldn't use it with a project
> released under BSD though, correct? I've avoided GPL until now because
> it forces me to think more about what the details all mean. :)
>
You are correct, but in that case I'm always willing to work something
out.
And I don't like complexity too much myself (w/r to licensing).
--Maarten
