[REBOL] Re: I just ain't gettin' it! :)
From: carl:cybercraft at: 20-Dec-2002 12:42
On 20-Dec-02, Ed Dana wrote:
> [SunandaDH--aol--com] wrote:
>> One way is 'poke (just like good old fashioned Basic):
>> x: [ 1 2 3 4 ]
>> index: 3
>> ;; replace a value
>> poke x index 5
>> == [1 2 5 4]
>> ;; do something to a value:
>> poke x index x/:index * 2
>> == [1 2 10 4]
> That's the ticket!
> Exactly what I was looking for.
> Thanks, Sunanda. :)
Note however that the opposite isn't peek, but...
>> pick [a b c d e] 3
== c
(:
--
Carl Read
