[REBOL] Re: I just ain't gettin' it! :)
From: edanaii:cox at: 19-Dec-2002 12:29
Gregg Irwin wrote:
>No, CHANGE changes a value at a given position in a series, or
>multiple values if you use /PART. You use AT to get the series at
>the position you want to change.
>
Yea, I finally realized why I got confused.
>> x: [ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
== [1 2 3 4 5]
>> Change at x 3 5
== [4 5]
Issuing Change appeared to cause a partial result set [ 4 5 ] to be
returned.
It wasn't until after I did the following that I realized my mistake.
>> x
== [1 2 5 4 5]
--
Sincerely, | The problems of two little people don't amount to
Ed Dana | a hill of beans in this crazy mixed-up world! But
Software Developer | this is OUR hill, and these are OUR beans!
1Ghz Athlon Amiga | -- Naked Gun via Casablanca.
