[REBOL] Re: Slashdot REBOL mention
From: ammonjohnson:yah:oo at: 29-Oct-2001 20:27
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ladislav Mecir" <[lmecir--mbox--vol--cz]>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Slashdot REBOL mention
> Hi Ammon,
> although unbelievable, the next version of SIF really works better.
Not unbelievable, True! I just wanted you to see the way REBOL thinks. ;-)
My point was that testing could be changed to:
testing: func [
return sif arg ['negative] ['zero] ['positive]
which would minimize the code, & use a function to return a value to a
function, as REBOL is so good at doing. ;-) Just a little more elegant.