[REBOL] Re: Slashdot REBOL mention
From: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 30-Oct-2001 4:24
> > Hi Ammon,
> >
> > although unbelievable, the next version of SIF really works better.
>
> Not unbelievable, True! I just wanted you to see the way REBOL thinks.
;-)
> My point was that testing could be changed to:
>
> testing: func [
> arg
> ][
> return sif arg ['negative] ['zero] ['positive]
> ]
>
> which would minimize the code, & use a function to return a value to a
> function, as REBOL is so good at doing. ;-) Just a little more elegant.
It surely is more elegant. The only disadvantage is, that it won't reveal
the bug I am mentioning.
