[REBOL] Re: Get name of actual function?
From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 18-Dec-2002 10:06
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [rebol-bounce--rebol--com] [mailto:[rebol-bounce--rebol--com]]
> On Behalf Of Joel Neely
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:34 PM
> To: [rebol-list--rebol--com]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Get name of actual function?
> This is a question that comes up every now and then.
> Functions don't have "actual names". Legacy languages such
> as c or vb may "fix" the relationship between names and
> functions at compile time, but that concept doesn't exist in REBOL.
Hi, I expected something like this... Anyway, I'm just seeking for a
smart way to track a call-graph without scattering my sources with
PRINTs. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be possible to print
line-numbers too. So how do you solve this? Robert