Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: [BUG?] read-io & write-io or Wait or is TCL better?

From: Rebolinth:nodep:dds:nl at: 24-Dec-2003 22:30

-- Conversation/lunch: "How do you Eat your Rebol in the Morning?" Quoting Andrew Martin Hello Andrew, I did ;-) but no effect... BUT.... I just found someting amazingly strange in the rebol buffering: bufsize: 8192 * 10 ;; for testing make it bigger buffer: make binary! bufsize after the while [ positive? size: read-io ...... I found that the Buffer is: 20479 bytes (length? buffer) the data received: 17331 bytes (read-io) data transmitted: 17331 bytes (write-io) AND now the odd thing --> The buffer should have been 17331 and not 20479 i assume. (The ssh session crashed here too) Because the read-io always returns the size of read bytes or extracts the byte-size too big to fit in the buffer from the size (which is not the fact here) Concluding: there is a some enthousiastic overrun here, interacting read-io & write-io using a buffer, the above caused the SSH the crash while the data entered my SSH client (ssh <-- Rebol tunnel --> sshd ) = NOK (ssh <-- TCL tunnel --> sshd ) = OK (telnet <-- Rebol tunnel --> telnetd ) = OK (http <-- Rebol tunnel --> httpd ) = OK (ftp <-- Rebol tunnel --> ftpd ) OK Mmmmm oddyyy.. Can someone confirm this perhpas? (R)egards, Norman.