[REBOL] Re: Wikipedia
From: peta:mailinator at: 19-Nov-2008 18:04
Sun>>I don't have a definition of proprietary.
Sun>>
Sun>>But I can see that REBOL Corp has stated that R3 has a proprietary
Sun>>core:
Sun>>
Sun>>http://www.rebol.com/rebol3/architecture.html
Sun>>
Sun>><<(2) Runtime Core - Closed
Sun>>
Sun>>This is the OS independent kernel that provides standard REBOL
Sun>>capabilities across all systems and devices. It is this component
Sun>>that makes REBOL operate identically on Windows, OSX, Linux, BSD,
Sun>>Sony, Nokia, Nintendo, and other systems.
Sun>>
Sun>>It should be noted that this component is not open source; it is a
Sun>>proprietary core.
Sun>>
Sun>>
Sun>> Sunanda
Agreed. A citation of a non-disputed information inserted by me to the Wikipedia REBOL
article: "The official REBOL interpreter is proprietary."
My opinion was, that it accurately reflects the above.
Peta