Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Wikipedia

From: peta:mailinator at: 19-Nov-2008 16:22

Ed>> Without getting into legal or semantic arguments, I think REBOL is a Ed>> proprietary language. I don't believe a successful case can be made against Ed>> it being proprietary. Ed>> Ed Thanks for the answers. Maybe I didn't emphasize one thing. The Wikipedia states, that "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". So, my question was related to the verifiability, taking into account that a publicly acceptable definition of "language proprietarity" does not exist yet. Do you have a definition at hand, which looks like a reasonable starting point to you? TIA Peta