[REBOL] Re: Wikipedia
From: peta:mailinator at: 19-Nov-2008 16:22
Ed>> Without getting into legal or semantic arguments, I think REBOL is a
Ed>> proprietary language. I don't believe a successful case can be made against
Ed>> it being proprietary.
Thanks for the answers. Maybe I didn't emphasize one thing. The Wikipedia states, that
"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth".
So, my question was related to the verifiability, taking into account that a publicly
acceptable definition of "language proprietarity" does not exist yet.
Do you have a definition at hand, which looks like a reasonable starting point to you?