[ALLY] Re: View Speed Test
From: jhagman:infa:abo:fi at: 23-Apr-2001 17:01
Quoting Carl Read ([carl--cybercraft--co--nz]):
> Amiga 1200, [68030--50mhz], Ateo Concepts Pixel64 GFX card.
>
> Interpreter time: 0:01:59.631728 5.45
> Bitmap time: 0:00:47.675712 8.39
> OS window time: 0:00:51.121089 8.80
>
> Anyone slower than that? (:
You bet! :)
Amiga 1200, [68030--28MHz] (I would guess), AGA (productivity mode, 128
colors)
Interpreter time: 0:03:56.377559 5.76
Bitmap time: 0:06:30.8026 12.99
OS window time: 0:02:22.525416 19.98
PAL 640x256 16 Colors:
Interpreter time: 0:03:49.934025 6.51
Bitmap time: 0:08:06.955525 57.51
OS window time: 0:01:49.183388 9.15
Weird, something seems to be a bit buggy with the percentages. Well, I
do not care.
> Out of interest, is there much difference in performance when running
> View on different OSs on the same machines? Windows, Linux, BSD
> etc.?
On my AMD [K6-2--450MHz] with ATI Charger I have tested the Linux and BeOS
versions of View. As one could assume BeOS is much faster on bitmap and
OS window time. I have no numbers of BeOS at the moment though.
Linux, PC above:
Interpreter time: 0:00:02.722577 119.37
Bitmap time: 0:00:05.355719 74.69
OS window time: 0:00:12.362731 36.40
and as you can see, the gfx card is crap :)
--
Jussi Hagman CS in Åbo Akademi University
Studentbyn 4 D 33 [juhagman--abo--fi]
20540 Åbo [jhagman--infa--abo--fi]
Finland
